Tag: Broda and Bojara v Poland

ECtHR judgment Broda and Bojara versus Poland (Appl. Nos. 26691/18 and 27367/18)

date

29 June 2021

ECtHR judgment Broda and Bojara versus Poland (Appl. Nos. 26691/18 and 27367/18)

Broda and Bojara versus Poland (26691/18 and 27367/18)

Concerted effort of the CJEU and the ECtHR may result in the hindering of some of the negative effects of changes in the judiciary. So far it has been the CJEU that has been active, with the courageous involvement of national judges and civil society – writes prof. Adam Bodnar, the Commissioner for Human Rights

Tags

Supreme Court Disciplinary Chamber disciplinary proceedings rule of law Poland Constitutional Tribunal judicial independence European Commission judges Zbigniew Ziobro Court of Justice of the EU National Council of the Judiciary Court of Justice European Union Andrzej Duda Igor Tuleya Małgorzata Manowska disciplinary system Minister of Justice Commissioner for Human Rights Mateusz Morawiecki CJEU presidential elections European Court of Human Rights judiciary Adam Bodnar preliminary rulings democracy muzzle law Hungary Jarosław Kaczyński elections 2020 Beata Morawiec First President of the Supreme Court prosecutors Kamil Zaradkiewicz European Arrest Warrant COVID-19 disciplinary commissioner President Prosecutor General Constitution freedom of expression criminal law Marek Safjan OSCE Waldemar Żurek Paweł Juszczyszyn National Public Prosecutor criminal proceedings Prime Minister Julia Przyłębska Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber Supreme Administrative Court conditionality mechanism conditionality EU budget Criminal Chamber Law and Justice prosecution NCJ National Prosecutor elections Wojciech Hermeliński Stanisław Piotrowicz Andrzej Zoll Małgorzata Gersdorf acting first president of the Supreme Court Aleksander Stepkowski Ordo Iuris May 10 2020 elections media independence Amsterdam District Court Krzysztof Parchimowicz Maciej Nawacki EAW media immunity Anna Dalkowska Piotr Schab Przemysław Radzik Council of Europe 2017 freedom of assembly Freedom House Lech Garlicki Stanisław Biernat Article 7 Venice Commission Włodzimierz Wróbel PM Mateusz Morawiecki Andrzej Stępka K 3/21 P 7/20 Ministry of Justice C-791/19 disciplinary liability for judges National Electoral Commission General Assembly of the Supreme Court Judges President of Poland President of the Republic of Poland Jarosław Gowin LGBT LGBT ideology free zones Sejm Broda and Bojara v Poland Michał Lasota Zuzanna Rudzińska-Bluszcz Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram defamation THEMIS TVP Lex Super Omnia Adam Tomczyński Belgium Netherlands Bogdan Święczkowski democratic backsliding Viktor Orban OLAF decommunization Next Generation EU veto police Józef Iwulski Law on the NCJ Justice Defence Committee – KOS recommendation Teresa Dębowska-Romanowska Kazimierz Działocha Mirosław Granat Adam Jamróz Stefan Jaworski Biruta Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska Wojciech Łączkowski Ewa Łętowska Human Rights Commissioner Marek Mazurkiewicz CCBE Andrzej Mączyński The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe Janusz Niemcewicz Małgorzata Pyziak- Szafnicka Stanisław Rymar public opinion poll Ferdynand Rymarz Andrzej Rzepliński Supreme Court President Jerzy Stępień Piotr Tuleja Sławomira Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz Mirosław Wyrzykowski report Bohdan Zdziennicki Marek Zubik media freedom Didier Reynders European Parliament Ziobro Michał Laskowski Marek Pietruszyński human rights corruption European Association of Judges 11 January March in Warsaw Court of Justice of the European Union coronavirus PiS resolution of 23 January 2020 Piotr Pszczółkowski Jarosław Wyrembak Leon Kieres PKW infringment action EU values ENCJ lex NGO civil society Russia Israel foreign agents law Organization of Security and Co-operation in Europe First President of the Suprme Court LGBT free zones equality Chamber of Extraordinary Verification hate crimes hate speech criminal code Grzęda v Poland Xero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. Poland Żurek v Poland Sobczyńska and Others v Poland Reczkowicz and Others v. Poland Rafał Trzaskowski media law Iustitia Krystian Markiewicz Przemysła Radzik Senate Marcin Warchoł Elżbieta Karska Marcin Romanowski Jacek Czaputowicz Przemysław Czarnek legislative practice ENA Zbigniew Boniek courts Ombudsman Kraśnik Norway Norwegian funds Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Michał Wawrykiewicz Free Courts C-487/19 Article 6 ECHR Article 10 ECHR Regional Court in Amsterdam Openbaar Ministerie Ursula von der Leyen Ewa Wrzosek AK judgment Simpson judgment EU law primacy Forum Współpracy Sędziów public broadcaster mutual trust LM Ireland Irena Majcher Amsterdam the Regional Court in Warsaw United Nations judcial independence Leszek Mazur Maciej Mitera populism interim measures autocratization Multiannual Financial Framework abortion ruling equal treatment abortion protests fundamental rights the Netherlands Denmark Sweden Finland Mariusz Krasoń CT President Germany Celmer C354/20 PPU C412/20 PPU Ausl 301 AR 104/19 Karlsruhe act on misdemeanours Civil Service Act Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe EU White Paper lustration transitional justice 2018 Nations in Transit Council of the EU media tax Stanisław Zabłocki advertising tax mediabezwyboru Jacek Kurski KESMA Index.hu Telex.hu Jelen József Szájer Klubrádió SLAPP LIBE Committee Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation Frans Timmermans Gazeta Wyborcza OKO.press US Department of State Pollityka Brussels I Rome II Swieczkowski Article 2 Forum shopping advocate general Dariusz Zawistowski transparency press release Sebastian Kaleta Rights and Values Programme C-156/21 C-157/21 C-619/18 Marek Piertuszyński defamatory statements World Justice Project award National Prosecutor’s Office intimidation of dissenters Wojciech Sadurski Bogdan Świączkowski Disicplinary Chamber judge Tribunal of State transfer Pech Olsztyn court Kochenov Przemysła Czarnek Evgeni Tanchev Education Minister Piotr Gąciarek Freedom in the World Krystyna Pawłowicz ECJ Ipsos Frackowiak Olimpia Barańska-Małusze retirement age Mariusz Muszyński Amnesty International Hudoc Łukasz Piebiak Regional Court in Kraków Piebiak gate Konrad Szymański Piotr Bogdanowicz trans-Atlantic values Piotr Buras LSO authoritarian equilibrium lawyers Article 258 Act of 20 December 2019 clientelism oligarchic system Recovery Fund European Public Prosecutor's Office repressive act Polish National Foundation Lux Veritatis Koen Lenaerts Małgorzata Bednarek Piotr Wawrzyk Paweł Filipek Maciej Taborowski harrassment Alina Czubieniak Justice Fund Gerard Birgfeller Ewa Maciejewska postal vote postal vote bill

28.07.2021

Advocate for vocal judges responds to defamation actions

27.07.2021

Historic appeal of 2073 Polish judges in defense of EU law

27.07.2021

Statement by retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal in defense of Judge Marek Safjan and the dignity of the Polish and European judiciary

21.07.2021

25 retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal appeal to PM Morawiecki to withdraw his motion in K 3/21 case

16.07.2021

Constitutional Tribunal ruled: CJEU interim orders do not apply in Poland

14.07.2021

The president, prosecutor general, and Sejm support the PM’s motion to the Constitutional Tribunal that leads to legal PolExit

Rule of Law - 28.07.2021

Advocate for vocal judges responds to defamation actions

Mariusz Jałoszewski - 27.07.2021

Historic appeal of 2073 Polish judges in defense of EU law

Rule of Law - 27.07.2021

Statement by retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal in defense of Judge Marek Safjan and the dignity of the Polish and European judiciary

Rule of Law - 21.07.2021

25 retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal appeal to PM Morawiecki to withdraw his motion in K 3/21 case

Anna Wójcik - 16.07.2021

Constitutional Tribunal ruled: CJEU interim orders do not apply in Poland

Anna Wójcik - 14.07.2021

Tag: Broda and Bojara v Poland

ECtHR judgment Broda and Bojara versus Poland (Appl. Nos. 26691/18 and 27367/18)

ECtHR judgment Broda and Bojara versus Poland (Appl. Nos. 26691/18 and 27367/18)

Strasbourg Steps in

Adam Bodnar

Strasbourg Steps in

Tags

Newest posts

Advocate for vocal judges responds to defamation actions

Historic appeal of 2073 Polish judges in defense of EU law

Statement by retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal in defense of Judge Marek Safjan and the dignity of the Polish and European judiciary

25 retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal appeal to PM Morawiecki to withdraw his motion in K 3/21 case

Constitutional Tribunal ruled: CJEU interim orders do not apply in Poland

The president, prosecutor general, and Sejm support the PM’s motion to the Constitutional Tribunal that leads to legal PolExit

Advocate for vocal judges responds to defamation actions

Historic appeal of 2073 Polish judges in defense of EU law

Statement by retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal in defense of Judge Marek Safjan and the dignity of the Polish and European judiciary

25 retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal appeal to PM Morawiecki to withdraw his motion in K 3/21 case

Constitutional Tribunal ruled: CJEU interim orders do not apply in Poland

The president, prosecutor general, and Sejm support the PM’s motion to the Constitutional Tribunal that leads to legal PolExit