Tag: CJEU
Attacks on CJEU Advocate General after his crushing assessment of PiS-led judicial “reforms”
The Minister of Justice feels that the opinion of the Advocate General of the EU Court of Justice Evgeni Tanchev is incompatible with EU law and constitutes a “defence of pathology in the Polish judiciary.” If the CJEU concurs with the Advocate General’s opinion, following the judgment Poland will have to select a new National Council of the Judiciary. Changes will also be necessary in other EU Member States.
Three Steps Ahead, One Step Aside: The AG’s Opinion in the Commission v. Poland Case
The Court opened – through the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – of the possibility to apply Article 47 of the Charter
Batory Foundation report: “Under siege. Why Polish courts matter for Europe and the case for infringement proceedings”
In the report published on 20 March 2019 by the Stefan Batory Foundation in cooperation with the European Stability Initiative, the two organisations discuss the state of rule of law in Poland. The authors argue that the EU should use its most effective tool to defend the rule of law and lodge another complaint to the Court of Justice of the EU
Newest posts
17.01.2020
Venice Commission opinion on the “muzzle law”
17.01.2020
Incredible official position of the Ministry of Justice regarding the opinion of the Venice Commission
17.01.2020
“We nominated them”. Did Minister Ziobro accidentally reveal who supported the judges to the NCJ?
16.01.2020
Gersdorf makes her move. Three Supreme Court chambers to rule on dodgy judicial nominations
10.01.2020
Judges under fire: 43 judges already targeted by disciplinary officer and prosecutors
10.01.2020