Tag: Venice Commission

Venice Commission opinion on the “muzzle law”

author

Rule of Law

date

17 January 2020

Venice Commission opinion on the “muzzle law”

“The amendments of December 2019 diminish judicial independence and put Polish judges into the impossible situation of having to face disciplinary proceedings for decisions required by the ECHR, the law of the European Union, and other international instruments.”

Incredible official position of the Ministry of Justice regarding the opinion of the Venice Commission

author

Rule of Law

date

17 January 2020

Incredible official position of the Ministry of Justice regarding the opinion of the Venice Commission

We publish the translation of the opinion published on the Ministry of Justice website for consideration of Rule of Law in Poland readers. This is of course not endorsement.

The rule of law in Poland Actions by EU institutions and unaddressed recommendations of the European Commission

author

Maria Ejchart-Dubois

date

6 March 2019

The rule of law in Poland Actions by EU institutions and unaddressed recommendations of the European Commission

Provisions subordinating the judiciary to the executive (including disciplinary proceedings against judges), which are completely incompatible with European standards, are still in place.

Tags

Supreme Court Disciplinary Chamber Constitutional Tribunal disciplinary proceedings Poland rule of law Zbigniew Ziobro European Commission judicial independence Court of Justice of the EU National Council of the Judiciary judges European Union Court of Justice Andrzej Duda Małgorzata Manowska Igor Tuleya disciplinary system European Court of Human Rights Mateusz Morawiecki Commissioner for Human Rights CJEU Minister of Justice Waldemar Żurek Jarosław Kaczyński democracy muzzle law presidential elections judiciary Adam Bodnar preliminary rulings K 3/21 Hungary elections 2020 Kamil Zaradkiewicz Beata Morawiec First President of the Supreme Court prosecutors disciplinary commissioner European Arrest Warrant Maciej Nawacki Przemysław Radzik Prime Minister media freedom Prosecutor General Constitution COVID-19 Piotr Schab Julia Przyłębska President freedom of expression Łukasz Piebiak Court of Justice of the European Union criminal law disciplinary liability for judges Marek Safjan Aleksander Stepkowski OSCE National Council for Judiciary Michał Lasota Paweł Juszczyszyn Anna Dalkowska National Public Prosecutor criminal proceedings freedom of assembly Stanisław Biernat Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber Supreme Administrative Court conditionality mechanism conditionality EU budget Włodzimierz Wróbel Criminal Chamber Law and Justice prosecution NCJ Ministry of Justice National Prosecutor elections Wojciech Hermeliński Stanisław Piotrowicz Andrzej Zoll Małgorzata Gersdorf acting first president of the Supreme Court Ordo Iuris K 7/21 May 10 2020 elections Lex Duda Sejm Xero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. Poland Broda and Bojara v Poland media independence Iustitia Jarosław Dudzicz Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram Amsterdam District Court Krzysztof Parchimowicz THEMIS EAW Ursula von der Leyen media immunity Council of Europe 2017 police Justice Defence Committee – KOS Freedom House Lech Garlicki Ewa Łętowska Supreme Court President Article 7 Venice Commission PM Mateusz Morawiecki Andrzej Stępka P 7/20 Justice Fund Dagmara Pawełczyk-Woicka PiS C-791/19 National Electoral Commission Astradsson v Iceland K 6/21 Piotr Pszczółkowski Jarosław Wyrembak Pegasus General Assembly of the Supreme Court Judges lex NGO civil society Russia National Reconstruction Plan Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora President of Poland President of the Republic of Poland Jarosław Gowin LGBT LGBT ideology free zones Reczkowicz and Others v. Poland Ukraine Krystian Markiewicz Konrad Wytrykowski Jakub Iwaniec Zuzanna Rudzińska-Bluszcz Dariusz Drajewicz Rafał Puchalski defamation courts Michał Wawrykiewicz Free Courts Article 6 ECHR Ewa Wrzosek EU law primacy TVP Lex Super Omnia Adam Tomczyński Belgium Netherlands Bogdan Święczkowski judcial independence Maciej Mitera democratic backsliding Viktor Orban OLAF decommunization Next Generation EU veto Józef Iwulski Law on the NCJ recommendation Teresa Dębowska-Romanowska Kazimierz Działocha Mirosław Granat Adam Jamróz Stefan Jaworski Biruta Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska Wojciech Łączkowski Human Rights Commissioner Marek Mazurkiewicz CCBE Andrzej Mączyński The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe Janusz Niemcewicz Małgorzata Pyziak- Szafnicka Stanisław Rymar public opinion poll Ferdynand Rymarz Andrzej Rzepliński Jerzy Stępień Piotr Tuleja Sławomira Wronkowska-Jaśkiewicz Mirosław Wyrzykowski report Bohdan Zdziennicki Marek Zubik Didier Reynders European Parliament OKO.press Ziobro Michał Laskowski Marek Pietruszyński Piotr Gąciarek Regional Court in Kraków Piebiak gate human rights corruption European Association of Judges 11 January March in Warsaw Recovery Fund Paweł Filipek Maciej Taborowski Adam Synakiewicz Belarus state of emergency neo-judges coronavirus Xero Flor v. Poland EU treaties Agnieszka Niklas-Bibik Słupsk Regional Court Maciej Rutkiewicz resolution of 23 January 2020 Mirosław Wróblewski Civil Chamber Joanna Misztal-Konecka Leon Kieres right to protest Sławomir Jęksa PKW Wiktor Joachimkowski Roman Giertych Mariusz Kamiński infringment action surveillance EU values Michał Woś Ministry of Finance Central Anti-Corruption Bureau ENCJ Jacek Sasin Ernest Bejda The First President of the Supreme Court Maciej Czajka Mariusz Jałoszewski Israel Łukasz Radke foreign agents law polexit National Recovery Plan Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v Poland Organization of Security and Co-operation in Europe Professional Liability Chamber First President of the Suprme Court suspension Paulina Kieszkowska-Knapik Maria Ejchart-Dubois Agreement for the Rule of Law Porozumienie dla Praworządności LGBT free zones Act sanitising the judiciary equality Marek Ast Maciej Ferek Chamber of Extraordinary Verification Edyta Barańska hate crimes Court of Appeal in Kraków hate speech Putinism criminal code Kaczyński Grzęda v Poland right to fair trial Paulina Aslanowicz Jarosław Matras Żurek v Poland Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek Sobczyńska and Others v Poland ct on the Protection of the Populatio parliament legislation Rafał Trzaskowski lex Woś media law Rome Statute International Criminal Court Przemysła Radzik Antykasta Senate Stanisław Zdun Irena Bochniak Krystyna Morawa-Fryźlewicz Marcin Warchoł Katarzyna Chmura Elżbieta Karska Marcin Romanowski Grzegorz Furmankiewicz Jacek Czaputowicz Marek Jaskulski Przemysław Czarnek Joanna Kołodziej-Michałowicz legislative practice Ewa Łąpińska Zbigniew Łupina ENA Paweł Styrna Zbigniew Boniek Kasta/Antykasta Andrzej Skowron Łukasz Biliński Ivan Mischenko Ombudsman Monika Frąckowiak Arkadiusz Cichocki Kraśnik Emilia Szmydt Norway Tomasz Szmydt Norwegian funds smear campaign Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs E-mail scandal Dworczyk leaks Michał Dworczyk C-487/19 media pluralism Article 10 ECHR Regional Court in Amsterdam Openbaar Ministerie AK judgment Simpson judgment Forum Współpracy Sędziów public broadcaster mutual trust LM Ireland Irena Majcher Amsterdam the Regional Court in Warsaw United Nations Leszek Mazur populism interim measures autocratization Multiannual Financial Framework abortion ruling equal treatment abortion protests fundamental rights the Netherlands Denmark Sweden Finland Mariusz Krasoń CT President Germany Celmer C354/20 PPU C412/20 PPU Ausl 301 AR 104/19 Karlsruhe act on misdemeanours Civil Service Act Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe EU White Paper lustration transitional justice 2018 Nations in Transit Council of the EU media tax Stanisław Zabłocki advertising tax mediabezwyboru Jacek Kurski KESMA Index.hu Telex.hu Jelen József Szájer Klubrádió SLAPP LIBE Committee Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation Frans Timmermans Gazeta Wyborcza US Department of State Pollityka Brussels I Rome II Swieczkowski Article 2 Forum shopping advocate general Dariusz Zawistowski transparency press release Sebastian Kaleta Rights and Values Programme C-156/21 C-157/21 C-619/18 Marek Piertuszyński defamatory statements World Justice Project award National Prosecutor’s Office intimidation of dissenters Wojciech Sadurski Bogdan Świączkowski Disicplinary Chamber judge Tribunal of State transfer Pech Olsztyn court Kochenov Przemysła Czarnek Evgeni Tanchev Education Minister Freedom in the World Krystyna Pawłowicz ECJ Ipsos Frackowiak Olimpia Barańska-Małusze retirement age Mariusz Muszyński Amnesty International Hudoc Konrad Szymański Piotr Bogdanowicz trans-Atlantic values Piotr Buras LSO authoritarian equilibrium lawyers Article 258 Act of 20 December 2019 clientelism oligarchic system European Public Prosecutor's Office repressive act Polish National Foundation Lux Veritatis Koen Lenaerts Małgorzata Bednarek Piotr Wawrzyk harrassment Marian Banaś Alina Czubieniak Supreme Audit Office TVN journalists lexTVN Gerard Birgfeller Ewa Maciejewska Polish media postal vote Kraków Rzeszów border postal vote bill primacy

29.06.2022

E-mail scandal: ‘Some journalist should ask me about it’. How the government’s narrative about ‘anarchy’ in the judiciary was created

01.06.2022

Attack of the disciplinary commissioners on Judge Żurek. ‘They are ridiculing themselves’

30.05.2022

Committee to Defend Justice KOS urges President of the European Commission not to give up on implementation of CJEU judgments on judicial independence in Poland

Maciej Taborowski - 29.06.2022

E-mail scandal: ‘Some journalist should ask me about it’. How the government’s narrative about ‘anarchy’ in the judiciary was created

Rule of Law - 01.06.2022

Attack of the disciplinary commissioners on Judge Żurek. ‘They are ridiculing themselves’

Rule of Law - 30.05.2022

Committee to Defend Justice KOS urges President of the European Commission not to give up on implementation of CJEU judgments on judicial independence in Poland

Tag: Venice Commission

Venice Commission opinion on the “muzzle law”

Rule of Law

Venice Commission opinion on the “muzzle law”

Incredible official position of the Ministry of Justice regarding the opinion of the Venice Commission

Rule of Law

Incredible official position of the Ministry of Justice regarding the opinion of the Venice Commission

The rule of law in Poland Actions by EU institutions and unaddressed recommendations of the European Commission

Maria Ejchart-Dubois

The rule of law in Poland Actions by EU institutions and unaddressed recommendations of the European Commission

Tags

Newest posts

Judiciary in Poland: an ongoing decay of the rule of law

The unruly media of the authorities, namely editors Morawiecki and Dworczyk in the Karnowskis’ portal

Open Letter to the European Commission regarding Polish National Council of the Judiciary

E-mail scandal: ‘Some journalist should ask me about it’. How the government’s narrative about ‘anarchy’ in the judiciary was created

Attack of the disciplinary commissioners on Judge Żurek. ‘They are ridiculing themselves’

Committee to Defend Justice KOS urges President of the European Commission not to give up on implementation of CJEU judgments on judicial independence in Poland

Judiciary in Poland: an ongoing decay of the rule of law

The unruly media of the authorities, namely editors Morawiecki and Dworczyk in the Karnowskis’ portal

Open Letter to the European Commission regarding Polish National Council of the Judiciary

E-mail scandal: ‘Some journalist should ask me about it’. How the government’s narrative about ‘anarchy’ in the judiciary was created

Attack of the disciplinary commissioners on Judge Żurek. ‘They are ridiculing themselves’

Committee to Defend Justice KOS urges President of the European Commission not to give up on implementation of CJEU judgments on judicial independence in Poland