A lawyer from Olsztyn made a donation to PiS and is a judge. His partner also contributed and he too wants to become a judge

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

Tomasz Kosakowski donated 12,500 zlotys to the PiS election fund and has just been appointed a judge by President Andrzej Duda. His former partner from the law firm paid 25,000 zlotys to the fund and is now applying for a position in the administrative court



President Andrzej Duda appointed Tomasz Kosakowski, attorney-at-law, to the position of judge of the Regional Court in Olsztyn on Tuesday, 6 October 2020. He will be a judge of the labour and social insurance division.

 

Markiewicz pays twice as much

When Tomasz Kosakowski was applying for the position of judge in the Regional Court in Olsztyn, he paid 12,500 zlotys to the PiS (Law and Justice party) election fund. This arises from PiS’ report submitted to the National Electoral Commission for 2019. The matter was discovered by OKO.press.

 

Kosakowski applied for a position in the court in Olsztyn in the recruitment process conducted by the new NCJ in April 2018. The new NCJ issued a resolution in February 2019 recommending him to the president for appointment as a judge. We have not managed to establish whether Kosakowski donated the money to the PiS election fund before or after the resolution was passed.

 

PiS’ report for 2019 shows that Paweł Markiewicz, legal counsel from Olsztyn, also made a contribution to this party’s election fund. He was managing the Legalexpert law firm together with Kosakowski. Markiewicz paid 25,000 zlotys to PiS’ fund. As Gazeta Wyborcza from Olsztyn wrote, he was recently a member of the supervisory board of the Warmia and Mazury Special Economic Zone as a representative of the Ministry of State Assets.

 

Paweł Markiewicz is also applying for a judicial post. He wants to become a judge of the Voivodship Administrative Court in Olsztyn.

 

He submitted his application in the recruitment conducted by the new NCJ in June 2020, which was after he donated the money to PiS’ election fund. The new NCJ will assess the candidates to the administrative court in Olsztyn in a week. Will Markiewicz, like his former partner from the Kosakowski law firm, be recommended for the office of judge?

 

The judges wanted the withdrawal of Kosakowski’s nomination

 

The matter of the nomination of Tomasz Kosakowski to the office of judge has outraged the judiciary community.

 

Because, although he made payments to PiS while formally being an attorney-at-law, he did so while he was applying for the position of judge. This raises the question of whether he satisfies the basic criteria for being a judge.

 

Attention was drawn to this by the Judges’ Cooperation Forum (FWS). The forum is an informal association of judges, which was formed in place of the old, legal NCJ that was dissolved by PiS.

 

In the resolution of 5 October, the FWS Permanent Presidium wrote that “significant doubts arise as to whether the candidate satisfies the requirement of being apolitical, as well as of having an impeccable character, which are the necessary qualities of being a judge”. The forum appealed for Kosowski’s candidacy to be withdrawn from the President’s Chancellery to “avoid compromising the judicial nomination process any further.” As can be seen, the president had no problems nominating him as a judge. In turn, after the article published by OKO.press, bitter comments appeared in the Internet that a position in a regional court costs 12,500 zlotys.

 

Questions about whether Kosakowski will be an independent judge are all the more justified as he posted entries in Facebook which are supportive of the current government.

 

The background to his photograph in a hood was a patch on a camo sweatshirt with a modified symbol of Fighting Poland [Polska Walcząca] and the slogan “Death to the Enemies of the Fatherland”. It arises from the history of his Facebook profile that he liked the profiles of church organizations and right-wing politicians, among others. He praised the government for its battle against the epidemic. He praised the president of the District Court in Olsztyn, Maciej Nawacki, for suspending Judge Paweł Juszczyszyn in his duties.

 

OKO.press tried to talk to Tomasz Kosakowski before the publication of our first article. We asked him about his contribution to the PiS election fund. “I don’t remember. In 2019? I can’t confirm that. I’m not saying no. You have surprised me,” Kosakowski only told. He then did not answer the questions sent by e-mail, he no longer answered his telephone and his Facebook profile was no longer available.



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

October 7, 2020

Tags

Supreme Courtdisciplinary proceedingsDisciplinary Chamberrule of lawjudicial independencePolandEuropean CommissionConstitutional TribunaljudgesCourt of Justice of the EUZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the JudiciaryCourt of JusticeEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaIgor TuleyaMałgorzata Manowskadisciplinary systemMinister of JusticeCommissioner for Human Rightspresidential electionsjudiciarypreliminary rulingsdemocracyCJEUmuzzle lawJarosław Kaczyńskielections 2020Beata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme CourtprosecutorsHungaryEuropean Arrest WarrantMateusz MorawieckiAdam BodnarCOVID-19Kamil ZaradkiewiczEuropean Court of Human Rightsdisciplinary commissionerPresidentfreedom of expressioncriminal lawOSCENational Public Prosecutorcriminal proceedingsExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberProsecutor GeneralSupreme Administrative CourtconditionalityConstitutionCriminal ChamberLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJNational ProsecutorelectionsMałgorzata Gersdorfacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisMay 10 2020 electionsWaldemar Żurekmedia independenceAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczEAWmediaPaweł JuszczyszynimmunityAnna DalkowskaCouncil of EuropePrime Minister2017freedom of assemblyJulia PrzyłębskaFreedom HouseVenice CommissionEU budgetWłodzimierz WróbelPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaMinistry of JusticeC-791/19disciplinary liability for judgesNational Electoral CommissionWojciech HermelińskiAndrzej ZollMarek SafjanGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesAleksander StepkowskiPresident of PolandJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesSejmMichał LasotaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramdefamationTHEMISMaciej NawackiTVPLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan ŚwięczkowskiPiotr SchabPrzemysław Radzikdemocratic backslidingViktor OrbandecommunizationNext Generation EUvetopoliceJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJLech GarlickirecommendationHuman Rights CommissionerCCBEThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeSupreme Court Presidentreportmedia freedomArticle 7European ParliamentZiobroconditionality mechanismMichał LaskowskiMarek Pietruszyńskihuman rightsEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawcoronavirusPiSresolution of 23 January 2020Stanisław PiotrowiczPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakLeon KieresPKWinfringment actionEU valuesENCJlex NGOcivil societyRussiaIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtPresident of the Republic of PolandLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechcriminal codeGrzęda v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawIustitiaKrystian MarkiewiczPrzemysła RadzikSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekcourtsOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsC-487/19Article 6 ECHRArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieUrsula von der LeyenEwa WrzosekAK judgmentSimpson judgmentEU law primacyForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited Nationsjudcial independenceLeszek MazurMaciej Miterapopulisminterim measuresOLAFautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUJustice Defence Committee – KOSC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUStanisław BiernatTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaWhite PaperKazimierz DziałochalustrationMirosław Granattransitional justiceAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiEwa ŁętowskaMarek MazurkiewiczAndrzej MączyńskiJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy Stępień2018Piotr TulejaNations in TransitSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczCouncil of the EUMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiMarek Zubikmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerDidier ReyndersKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaOKO.pressUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s Officeintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatetransferK 3/21PechOlsztyn courtKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakretirement ageAmnesty InternationalŁukasz PiebiakPiebiak gatetrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakJustice FundGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote bill