Minister Bodnar has appointed a codification commission tasked with reforming the courts and the prosecutor’s office

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

The appointed codification commission of the system of common courts and the prosecutor's office, led by the president of Iustitia, Prof. Krystian Markiewicz, is to propose a true reform of the courts. This commission will also decide what to do next with the neo-judges.



On Friday, April 12, 2024, Prime Minister Donald Tusk appointed members of the commission at the request of Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar. This is already the second codification commission established under the Ministry of Justice. At the beginning of April 2024, the Prime Minister appointed members of the codification commission for criminal law, which is tasked with reviewing this law and cleaning up the criminal codes after the times of Ziobro. Leading this commission is a legitimate judge of the Supreme Court from the Criminal Chamber, Prof. Włodzimierz Wróbel from Jagiellonian University.

 

The chairman of the codification commission for civil law is also known. It will be headed by the former president of the Constitutional Tribunal and judge of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Prof. Marek Safjan. Its members have not yet been appointed. There will also be a fourth commission for family law.

 

The codification commissions for criminal and civil law operated during the PO-PSL government, but they were dissolved by Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro. Minister Bodnar is reactivating them and appointing two new ones – for family law and the system of common courts and the prosecutor’s office.

 

All commissions are meant to help Bodnar reform the law – to clean it from the bad changes introduced during the PiS government, but also to adapt it to the present times. The commissions consist of recognized legal experts and authorities. The proposals developed by them will be presented for further consultations and legislative work.

 

On Friday, April 12, 2024, Minister Bodnar, while presenting the letters of appointment to the codification commission for the system of common courts and the prosecutor’s office, said: “Its establishment is of particular importance because such an institution did not exist before. Thanks to your work, it will be possible to introduce reforms and return to the rule of law in the field of Courts and the Prosecutor’s Office. The mission of the commission is to support reforms and repair reality so that the legislative solutions developed will function and lay the groundwork for further changes that will improve the operation of Courts and the Prosecutor’s Office for the years to come.”

 

And the chairman of this commission, Prof. Krystian Markiewicz from the University of Silesia – in the photo at the top – added: “We are facing a huge challenge. Courts and the Prosecutor’s Office must operate efficiently and fairly. This is our task, which we must fulfill.”

 

The task of this commission will be to develop draft legislative acts. It will also be responsible for providing opinions on draft legal acts sent to them for assessment by the Minister of Justice.

 

Minister Bodnar did not choose Prof. Krystian Markiewicz without reason. The largest association of Polish judges led by him, Iustitia, was a serious defender of the rule of law. It was thanks in part to Iustitia that Minister Ziobro, despite reprisals, did not break the judges.

 

This commission will indeed determine how the courts will ultimately be structured and how they will operate. It will decide on the new Supreme Court (SN), the new National Council of the Judiciary (KRS), and whether the Minister of Justice will continue to have administrative oversight over the courts. Judges are against this oversight because the times of Ziobro showed that it leads to control over the courts and judges.

 

This commission will also decide whether neo-judges will lose their appointments from the neo-KRS or whether they will be subject to verification. Finally, this commission will develop the independence of the prosecutor’s office from politics and the ultimate reform of the prosecutor’s office. That’s why there are also members of the association of independent prosecutors from Lex Super Omnia in the commission, who defended the independence of the prosecutor’s office.

 

The codification commission for the system of common courts and the prosecutor’s office faces a significant challenge. It not only has to clean up the justice system after years of Ziobro’s rule but also has to push the courts forward to make them more efficient, modern, and citizen-oriented. Members of Iustitia spoke about such courts a few days ago at their XXX congress. Prof. Krystian Markiewicz also speaks of such courts, emphasizing that there is no going back to the courts before 2015.

 

Here is the composition of the codification commission for the system of common courts and the prosecutor’s office, led by Prof. Krystian Markiewicz:

 

1. Bohdan Bieniek: Legitimate judge of the Supreme Court from the Chamber of Labor and Social Insurance. He was involved in defending the rule of law and chaired the adjudicating panel that confirmed the expiration of the parliamentary mandate of Mariusz Kamiński from PiS.

2. Dr. Maciej Czajka: Judge of the District Court in Krakow. He engaged in defending independent courts, for which he faced reprisals.

3. Dr. hab. Katarzyna Gajda-Roszczynialska: Judge of the District Court for Krakow Krowodrza.

4. Dr. Michał Węglowski: Prosecutor of the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Gdańsk. He is a co-author of a competing draft law on the new prosecutor’s office, separate from Lex Super Omnia.

5. Dr. hab. Karolina Kremens: Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Law, Administration, and Economics at the University of Wrocław. She is the vice-chair of the commission.

6. Dr. Jarosław Matras: Legitimate judge of the Supreme Court from the Criminal Chamber. In recent years, he has defended the independence of the Supreme Court and advocated for the rights of persecuted judges.

7. Dr. Michał Mistygacz: Prosecutor of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw. He is an assistant professor at the Department of Political Systems at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies at the University of Warsaw and a member of Lex Super Omnia.

8. Jarosław Onyszczuk: Prosecutor of the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw. He is a member of Lex Super Omnia and has been actively involved in defending the independence of the prosecutor’s office. He advocates for persecuted prosecutors.

9. Dr. Małgorzata Szeroczyńska: Member of the National Council of Prosecutors, prosecutor of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Żyrardów. She is affiliated with Lex Super Omnia.

10. Dr. hab. Maciej Taborowski: Professor at the Institute of Legal Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences. He worked with Bodnar when he was the Ombudsman. He has been involved in defending the rule of law and specializes in European law.

11. Prof. dr hab. Piotr Tuleja: Head of the Department of Constitutional Law at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Warsaw. He is a retired judge of the Constitutional Tribunal.

12. Dr. hab. Marcin Walasik: Professor at the Department of Civil Procedure at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. He is a judge of the District Court Poznań-Grunwald and Jeżyce in Poznań.

13. Dr. Bartosz Wołodkiewicz: Assistant Professor at the Department of Civil Procedure at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Warsaw.

14. Aleksandra Wrzesińska-Nowacka: Judge of the Supreme Administrative Court, adjudicating in the Financial Chamber.

15. Dr. Tomasz Zalasiński: Legal advisor, member of the State Tribunal from 2019 to 2023.

The secretary of the Commission is Dr. Urszula Żółtak, a judge from the capital city, associated with Iustitia.

 

The article was published in Polish in OKO.press on 12 April 2024.



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

April 20, 2024

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary Chamberjudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the JudiciaryCourt of Justice of the EUjudicial independenceEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsAdam BodnarIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemmuzzle lawJarosław KaczyńskiNational Recovery PlanCJEUMateusz Morawieckineo-judgesCommissioner for Human RightsCourt of Justice of the European UnionPrzemysław RadzikWaldemar ŻurekdemocracyNational Council for JudiciaryPiotr Schabelectionspresidential electionsKamil ZaradkiewiczJulia Przyłębskamedia freedomcriminal lawelections 2023disciplinary commissionerharassmentprosecutionSupreme Administrative CourtHungaryelections 2020preliminary rulingsjudiciaryDagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaK 3/21First President of the Supreme CourtPaweł JuszczyszynNational ProsecutorRecovery FundPresidentMichał LasotaProsecutor GeneralŁukasz PiebiakBeata MorawiecprosecutorsEuropean Arrest Warrantfreedom of expressionConstitutionPrime MinisterSejmimmunityMaciej NawackiIustitiaRegional Court in KrakówCriminal ChamberCOVID-19Maciej FerekOSCEMałgorzata GersdorfcourtsVenice CommissionMarek SafjanMinistry of JusticeExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberEU budgetdisciplinary liability for judgesWojciech HermelińskiPiSNCJKrystian MarkiewiczStanisław PiotrowiczPresident of the Republic of PolandAleksander Stepkowskicommission on Russian influenceJustice FundTHEMISLabour and Social Security ChamberLaw and JusticeNational Public ProsecutorCouncil of Europecriminal proceedingsconditionalitycorruptionStanisław BiernatreformsAnna Dalkowskafreedom of assemblyconditionality mechanismWłodzimierz WróbelsuspensionPiotr GąciarekOrdo IurisReczkowicz and Others v. PolandparliamentMarcin RomanowskiAndrzej Stępkamedia independenceChamber of Professional LiabilityBroda and Bojara v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandP 7/20K 7/21LGBTPresident of PolandNational Reconstruction PlanJarosław DudziczLex DudaProfessional Liability ChamberMay 10 2020 electionsStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationPiotr PrusinowskidefamationLex Super OmniamediaUrsula von der LeyenKrzysztof ParchimowiczEAWabortionMichał Wawrykiewiczelectoral codeAmsterdam District CourtNext Generation EUSLAPPConstitutional Tribunal PresidentDidier ReyndersTVPEwa ŁętowskaSenateParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeLech GarlickiSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramArticle 6 ECHRAndrzej ZollNational Electoral CommissionFreedom HouseJarosław WyrembakJustice Defence Committee – KOSreformArticle 7acting first president of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court President2017PM Mateusz MorawieckipolicePiotr TulejaJerzy StępieńAndrzej RzeplińskiFerdynand RymarzStanisław RymarMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaDariusz ZawistowskiOKO.pressreportSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskiMarek ZubikDariusz KornelukMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekEuropean Parliamentmilestoneselectoral processAndrzej MączyńskiJózef IwulskiWojciech MaczugavetoOLAFViktor OrbanSzymon Szynkowski vel SękMaciej Miterajudcial independencecourt presidentsJanusz NiemcewiczTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaMarek MazurkiewiczZiobroMirosław GranatWojciech ŁączkowskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaStefan JaworskiAdam JamrózKazimierz Działochainsulting religious feelingsrestoration of the rule of lawright to fair trialXero Flor v. PolandLaw on the NCJKrakówstate of emergencydecommunizationBelarusAdam SynakiewiczAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21Joanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraCentral Anti-Corruption BureausurveillanceMariusz KamińskiPegasusEdyta BarańskaJoanna Misztal-KoneckaCivil ChamberUkraineSupreme Audit OfficeMarian BanaśKrystyna PawłowiczCCBERafał PuchalskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeMarek PietruszyńskiMichał Laskowskipublic opinion pollsmear campaignMariusz MuszyńskiHuman Rights CommissionerMaciej TaborowskiPaweł FilipekInternational Criminal CourtKonrad WytrykowskirecommendationaccountabilityJakub IwaniecDariusz DrajewicztransparencyFree CourtsBohdan Zdziennickiretirement ageSLAPPsPATFoxLGBT ideology free zoneslexTuskAdam Tomczyński11 January March in Warsawabuse of state resourcesEuropean Association of Judgespublic mediaEwa Wrzosekcourt changesC-791/19democratic backslidingcoronavirushuman rightscriminal codePiebiak gateelections fairnessZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczJarosław GowinEU law primacyPiotr PszczółkowskiBelgiumtransferNetherlandscivil societyRussiaBogdan Święczkowskielections integrityintimidation of dissentersMarcin Warchołlex NGOGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszCrimes of espionageNCBiRJoanna KnobelKasta/AntykastaThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentHater ScandalPaweł StyrnaGrzegorz FurmankiewiczDariusz BarskiJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczJustyna WydrzyńskaKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczEwa ŁąpińskaIrena BochniakZbigniew ŁupinaNational Broadcasting CouncilKatarzyna ChmuraStanisław ZdunLasotaAntykastaEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFMarek JaskulskiRome StatuteCourt of Appeal in Warsawlex RaczkowskiCourt of Appeal in KrakówNational Council for the JudiciaryMarek Astgag lawsuitsAssessment ActAct sanitising the judiciaryenvironmentPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAgreement for the Rule of LawMaria Ejchart-DuboisPaulina Kieszkowska-Knapikstrategic investmentPiotr HofmańskiUS State DepartmentPutinismKaczyńskilex Wośdisinformationextraordinary commissionlegislationthe Spy ActZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaHelsinki Foundation for Human RightsinvestmentMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekOsiatyński'a ArchiveJarosław MatrasPaulina AslanowiczPiotr Raczkowskict on the Protection of the PopulatioAndrzej SkowronoppositionDariusz DończykPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekGrzegorz PudaNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeinsultState TribunalDonald Tusk governmenttest of independencepilot-judgmentVěra JourováTomasz Koszewskiright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawJakub KwiecińskidiscriminationAnti-SLAPP DirectiveODIHRcivil lawDonald TuskJustice MinistryJoanna Scheuring-WielgusAction PlanAdam GendźwiłłElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikSebastian Mazurekjustice system reformJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiEuropean Court of HuMałgorzata FroncRafał LisakKarolina MiklaszewskaRadosław BaszukNGOFull-Scale Election Observation MissionWałęsa v. PolandAct on the Supreme CourtLech WałęsaMichał DworczykDworczyk leaksAleksandra RutkowskaE-mail scandalRafał WojciechowskidelegationsTomasz SzmydtEmilia SzmydtWatchdog PolskaArkadiusz CichockiKaspryszyn v PolandDobrochna Bach-GoleckaMonika FrąckowiakNCR&Delection fairnessIvan Mischenkomedia pluralism#RecoveryFilesWiesław Kozielewiczelectoral commissionsMarcin MatczakChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakArkadiusz RadwanMarcin KrajewskiBohdan BieniekGeneral Court of the EUKrzysztof Rączkarepairing the rule of lawPoznańNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)Koan Lenaertscodification commissionKarol WeitzŁukasz BilińskiPKWhate speechGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikElżbieta KarskaJacek Czaputowiczhate crimesChamber of Extraordinary Verificationinfringment actionEU valuesENCJIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceAK judgmentSimpson judgmentpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawOpenbaar MinisterieRegional Court in AmsterdamENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRUnited NationsLeon KierespopulismLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsStanisław ZabłockiCouncil of the EUequal treatmentfundamental rightsCT PresidentEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitWorld Justice Project awardWojciech SadurskiAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote billlawyersLSOjudgePechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakAmnesty Internationaltrans-Atlantic valuesresolution of 23 January 2020Olsztyn courtoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficePolish National FoundationLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykTVNjournalistslexTVNclientelismArticle 258Przemysła CzarnekEducation MinisterIpsosOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumPolish mediaRzeszówMichał WośMinistry of FinanceJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitRoman GiertychWiktor JoachimkowskiborderprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczMirosław Wróblewskiright to protestSławomir JęksaDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandTribunal of StateLeszek MazurCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActForum Współpracy Sędziówmedia taxGermanyMariusz Krasońinterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandadvertising taxmediabezwyboruArticle 2Forum shoppingEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian KaletaC-156/21C-157/21Marek PiertuszyńskiNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiRome IIBrussels IJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióGazeta WyborczaPollitykaDisicplinary Chamber