Zaradkiewicz: Supreme Court will soon be worthy of the trust of the citizens in Poland

Share

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland

More

New acting first president of the Supreme Court judge Kamil Zaradkiewicz asks the Supreme Court’s judges to refrain from public activity, in particular in the media



Authors: Mateusz Mikowski and Marcin Jabłoński, Polish Press Agency (PAP)

 

What follows is a translation of the Polish Press Agency’s article including statements of the acting First President of the Supreme Court Kamil Zaradkiewicz.

 

“In this difficult time, I have assumed the honourable function of leading the Supreme Court, and I declare that it is operating in accordance with the standards of independence and reliability, and with due attention to the highest standards of the functioning of the judiciary,” judge Kamil Zaradkiewicz said.

 

In a statement sent to the Polish Press Agency on Friday 1 May, judge Zaradkiewicz also assessed that we are witnessing a breakthrough in the functioning of justice which Polish society expects. He added that “soon the Supreme Court will be worthy of a positive assessment”.

 

On Thursday 30 April, the six-year term of office of the Supreme Court’s President Małgorzata Gersdorf expired. Pursuant to the entitlement arising from the Act on the Supreme Court, President Andrzej Duda entrusted the performance of the duties of the 1st President of the Supreme Court to Judge Kamil Zaradkiewicz on 1 May until the appointment of a new First President of the Supreme Court. During the next seven days, Zaradkiewicz should convene an assembly of the Supreme Court judges to select candidates for the new First President of this court.

 

In his statement to PAP, Judge Zaradkiewicz noted that due to the coronavirus epidemic, the implementation of this obligation “must take into account the provision of necessary precautions that will allow the judges to participate safely in the General Assembly and guarantee the safety of the Supreme Court’s employees.”

 

Zaradkiewicz emphasised that he would try to ensure that “the Supreme Court returns to fulfilling its obligations of jurisprudence while respecting the principles of the independence of courts and judges, the supremacy of the Polish Constitution and the rule of law.”

 

He noted that “the distortion of the essence of these basic values ​​in recent years has unfortunately had a significant impact on consolidating the negative image of the judiciary, including the Supreme Court, in public opinion.”

 

He appealed to the judges to “refrain from taking any actions, including public statements, that could weaken confidence in the independent judiciary, and even more so, could testify to the judge’s political motivation or lack of objectivity.” “I am asking the Supreme Court’s judges to refrain from public activity, in particular in the media, which could deepen divisions and consolidate the negative image of the judiciary,” Zaradkiewicz’s statement reads.

 

Judge Zaradkiewicz also appealed for the principles of independence and independence to be respected, and for abandoning what he sees as the undermining of the status of judges, something which is contrary to the Polish constitution. “I expect people to refrain from calling for specific decisions, or other attempts to interfere in the sphere of judicial independence, including those in an institutionalised form,” Zaradkiewicz stressed.

 

The judge emphasised that a real challenge for the judiciary was to account for those responsible for perpetuating the system of Communist lawlessness, stating that “in the common opinion the judiciary has failed to meet this challenge.” “I also hope that the time has come, several decades after the Republic of Poland regained its sovereignty, when the judiciary will free itself from the shameful heritage of legal crimes and the immensity of the injustices that have so far not been resolved,” Judge Zaradkiewicz emphasised in his statement.

 

In his opinion, “this will not be possible without judges who respect the principles of apoliticality and independence.” “Those who are unable to meet the above standards while performing their duties, and who are guided by their often undisguised political motivation, something typical of the period of the totalitarian Communist regime, should leave the judiciary,” he stressed.

 

Judge Zaradkiewicz also expressed the hope that “by introducing and consolidating the standards of independence and impartiality necessary for the proper functioning of the judiciary (…) the Supreme Court, as a constitutional public authority, will soon be worthy of the positive assessment and the trust of the citizens.”

 

Translated by Jim Todd



Author


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


More

Published

May 4, 2020

Tags

Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaldisciplinary proceedingsPolandrule of lawZbigniew Ziobrojudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionNational Council of the JudiciaryjudgesEuropean UnionCourt of JusticeMałgorzata ManowskaAndrzej DudaIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemCommissioner for Human RightsEuropean Court of Human RightsCJEUMinister of JusticeMateusz MorawieckiJarosław Kaczyńskipresidential electionsjudiciaryAdam Bodnarpreliminary rulingsdemocracyK 3/21muzzle lawHungaryelections 2020Kamil ZaradkiewiczBeata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme CourtprosecutorsWaldemar Żurekdisciplinary commissionerEuropean Arrest WarrantProsecutor GeneralConstitutionCOVID-19Julia PrzyłębskaPresidentmedia freedomfreedom of expressionCourt of Justice of the European Unioncriminal lawMarek SafjanAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPaweł JuszczyszynNational Public ProsecutorPiotr SchabPrzemysław Radzikcriminal proceedingsPrime Ministerfreedom of assemblyStanisław BiernatExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberSupreme Administrative Courtconditionality mechanismconditionalityEU budgetCriminal ChamberLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeNational ProsecutorelectionsWojciech HermelińskiStanisław PiotrowiczAndrzej ZollMałgorzata Gersdorfacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisMay 10 2020 electionsBroda and Bojara v Polandmedia independenceAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczTHEMISMaciej NawackiEAWmediaimmunityAnna DalkowskaCouncil of Europe2017policeFreedom HouseLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaArticle 7Venice CommissionWłodzimierz WróbelPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaP 7/20Justice FundPiSC-791/19disciplinary liability for judgesNational Electoral CommissionAstradsson v IcelandPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakPegasusGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesPresident of PolandPresident of the Republic of PolandJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesSejmXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandIustitiaKrystian MarkiewiczMichał LasotaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramdefamationcourtsEwa WrzosekEU law primacyTVPLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independencedemocratic backslidingViktor OrbanOLAFdecommunizationNext Generation EUvetoJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJJustice Defence Committee – KOSrecommendationTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiHuman Rights CommissionerMarek MazurkiewiczCCBEAndrzej MączyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiSupreme Court PresidentJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskireportBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersEuropean ParliamentOKO.pressZiobroMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskiPiotr Gąciarekhuman rightscorruptionEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyneo-judgescoronavirusXero Flor v. PolandEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej Rutkiewiczresolution of 23 January 2020K 6/21Mirosław WróblewskiCivil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaLeon Kieresright to protestSławomir JęksaPKWWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMariusz Kamińskiinfringment actionsurveillanceEU valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauENCJJacek SasinErnest Bejdalex NGOThe First President of the Supreme Courtcivil societyMaciej CzajkaRussiaMariusz JałoszewskiIsraelŁukasz Radkeforeign agents lawpolexitNational Recovery PlanK 7/21Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechcriminal codeGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsC-487/19Article 6 ECHRArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieUrsula von der LeyenAK judgmentSimpson judgmentForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsLeszek MazurMaciej Miterapopulisminterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s Officeintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatetransferPechOlsztyn courtKochenovPrzemysła CzarnekEvgeni TanchevEducation MinisterFreedom in the WorldKrystyna PawłowiczECJIpsosFrackowiakOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeretirement ageMariusz MuszyńskiAmnesty InternationalHudocŁukasz PiebiakRegional Court in KrakówPiebiak gateKonrad SzymańskiPiotr Bogdanowicztrans-Atlantic valuesPiotr BurasLSOauthoritarian equilibriumlawyersArticle 258Act of 20 December 2019clientelismoligarchic systemRecovery FundEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officerepressive actPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisKoen LenaertsMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykharrassmentMarian BanaśAlina CzubieniakSupreme Audit OfficeTVNjournalistslexTVNGerard BirgfellerEwa MaciejewskaPolish mediapostal voteKrakówRzeszówDagmara Pawełczyk-Woickaborderpostal vote billprimacy