TVP received PLN 5.9 bn of state aid in 4 years. In addition, hundreds of millions from state-owned companies and institutions


an award-winning investigative journalist and head of investigative team at


Polish national television, Telewizja Polska, mocks the media protest against taxing advertising. It does not have to worry about the new levy itself – the majority of its revenue is state aid. It has received PLN 5.9 billion since 2016. Added to that, hundreds of millions from orders from state institutions and advertisements from state-owned companies

The Polish media organized a protest on Wednesday, 10 February 2021, which was unprecedented in Polish history – TV and radio stations, as well as internet portals suspended their activities for 24 hours, and some newspapers appeared with their front pages painted over. All the media participating in the event published a message that it was a protest against the new tax – on advertising revenue.


PiS explains it wants to introduce this to force those who are avoiding taxes – social media giants (such as Facebook) and large media companies – to pay them. It argues that some of the money will return to the media. In reality, the tax will weaken the independent media and, almost certainly, only state-owned and pro-government media will receive aid.


They did not suspend their activities on Wednesday. Throughout the day, they argued that the tax is good and companies that do not want to pay it are bad. On news strips broadcast during various programmes ,TVP Info wrote:


  • ‘International media corporations are treating Poland like a colony’,
  • ‘Media corporations do not want to share multi-million zloty profits with Poles’,
  • ‘German media do not want to pay a contribution to Polish healthcare, culture and monuments for Poles’.


In the programme called ‘Jedziemy’, Michał Rachoń recalled that, in 2020, the opposition wanted the money that PiS decided to allocate to the public media to be reallocated to the fight against cancer. And he was surprised that now, when there is an opportunity to pay a tax for the health service, the media object to it. He forgot to mention that most of the media already pay taxes and various fees to the state. Meanwhile, TVP was granted further state support in 2020.


As we calculated from the data collected by the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK), Telewizja Polska received exactly PLN 5,894,997,309 in state aid since 2016. Of this:

  • in 2016 – PLN 422,744,303,
  • in 2017 – PLN 1,215,994,718,
  • in 2018 – PLN 385,691,346,
  • in 2019 – PLN 1,497,230,217,
  • in 2020 – PLN 2,043,102,825
  • and up to January 2021, it has already received PLN 330,233,900.


But this is not the only public money that is filling TVP’s coffers. Since the beginning of the PiS government, it has been receiving increasingly more money from orders from state institutions and advertisements of state companies. According to the report prepared by Prof. Tadeusz Kowalski from the Faculty of Journalism at the University of Warsaw, in 2016–2019, TVP earned PLN 818,995,000 on advertisements from state-owned companies.


PLN 5.8 billion for the public mission


A significant proportion of the state aid that TVP received – as much as PLN 5,788,852,155 – is the licence fee for the public mission and compensation for the lost licence fee.


A total of PLN 2,009,093,655 has been paid to Telewizja Polska since 2016 from the licence fee, which is collected from owners of TV sets. Of this:


  • in 2016 – PLN 365,524,126,
  • in 2017 – PLN 355,141,883,
  • in 2018 – PLN 385,484,346,
  • in 2019 – PLN 331,380,000,
  • in 2020 – PLN 331,429,300
  • and in 2021 – PLN 330,134,000.


Since some of the viewers have been exempted from the obligation to pay the licence fee by statute, TVP also receives compensation for lost revenues. It received them irregularly up to 2020. In 2017, the National Broadcasting Council awarded it compensation for 2010–2017. In 2019 – partial compensation for 2018 and 2019. In January 2020, parliament passed an act, granting TVP SA and Polskie Radio SA compensation in the form of securities:


  • for the as yet uncompensated licence fees for 2018 and 2019
  • and for revenues lost in 2020.


According to the law, the value of securities transferred to the public media during the year cannot exceed PLN 1,950,000,000. They are to receive such compensation up to 2024.


Overall, under the PiS government, Telewizja Polska was granted compensation of PLN 3,698,758,500. Of this:

  • in November 2017 – PLN 860,000,000,
  • in April 2019 – PLN 1,127,258,500
  • and in March 2020 – PLN 1,711,500,000.
  • It arises from TVP’s financial statements that the share of state aid in its revenues has been increasing in recent years. In 2019, subscription fees and compensation for subscription fees accounted for as much as 57% of TVP’s revenue. In 2020, this value was probably even higher (the financial statements for 2020 will be known in April 2021).

Over PLN 100 million for the conservation of heritage and other purposes


According to UOKiK’s data, apart from the licence fee and compensation for the licence fee, TVP received over PLN 100 million in other state aid. The largest proportion of this amount – a total of PLN 95,019,764 – was transferred to it by Centrum Projektów Polska Cyfrowa [the Digital Poland Project Centre].

  • In 2016, CPPC granted PLN 269,424 to Telewizja Polska for training aid,
  • also in 2016 – PLN 56,491,921 for supporting culture and preserving cultural heritage
  • and in 2019 – PLN 38,328,419 also for supporting culture and preserving cultural heritage.


TVP received smaller grants from the Polish Film Institute (a total of PLN 950,000) and from the voivodship funds for environmental protection and water management in Katowice, Wrocław and Łódź (a total of PLN 1,097,701).


The data on state aid to TVP does not include the PLN 20 million that was allocated in 2016 to the increase in this company’s capital. The funds came from the state Reprivatization Fund.


Hundreds of millions of zlotys from state-owned companies


However, state aid is not the only state funds paid to TVP. For years, its coffers have also been filled with huge amounts of money from state-owned companies.


According to the report published last year by Prof. Tadeusz Kowalski from the Faculty of Journalism at the University of Warsaw, state-owned companies spent PLN 818,995,000 on advertising in TVP in 2016–2019. Of this:

  • in 2016 – PLN 129,154,000,
  • in 2017 – PLN 138,476,000,
  • w 2018 – PLN 242,948,000,
  • and in 2019 – PLN 308,417,000.


These are not exact figures. Prof. Kowalski’s report is based on Kantar’s data, which estimates advertising expenses in the media on the basis of official advertising price lists. However, most media give large discounts to their clients. Even so, Prof. Kowalski’s calculations show the general trend: state-owned companies are spending increasingly more money on advertising in TVP.


And this is happening at a time when company advertising spend on television is falling. And when TVP’s own advertising revenues are also far from those of several years ago.


According to Prof. Kowalski, ‘State Treasury companies clearly prefer state media, such as TVP and Polskie Radio, which is consequently a form of camouflaged state aid. Of course a certain proportion of them, which is unfortunately difficult to define clearly, is completely justified by market, commercial or cultural reasons, but they also constitute financial support for the party and government propaganda’.

Millions from public institutions


Considerable sums of money from state institutions and agencies also flow into TVP each year, as they commission it to promote their activities and co-finance production. Likewise, the production of programmes and handling of events that TVP later refers to as an illustration of how wonderfully it is pursuing its public mission.




The following were mentioned in the ‘Report on Telewizja Polska S.A.’s use of revenues from licence fees earmarked for the fulfilment of the public broadcaster’s mission in 2016’, as flagship examples of its mission activities:

  • coverage of World Youth Days and their accompanying programmes;
  • media coverage of the NATO summit;
  • coverage and programmes related to the 1050th anniversary of the Baptism of Poland (including ‘Wielki test z historii. Chrzest Polski’ [the Great history test. The Baptism of Poland] on TVP 1)
  • and coverage of the Cursed Soldiers National Remembrance Day and programmes about the ‘Cursed Soldiers’.


However, in addition to the money from the licence fee, TVP received additional financial support for all these activities. In June 2016, the Minister of the Treasury awarded it a grant for ‘media support and production of the TV broadcast of World Youth Day’. According to a Supreme Audit Office report, TVP received more than PLN 9 million for this.

A similar agreement was concluded with TVP by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Telewizja Polska was given the role of ‘official broadcaster’ during the NATO Summit in Poland. It is not known to this day how much money TVP received for that. At that time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defence also commissioned a number of promotional activities related to the summit. The amount they collectively paid for that is also a mystery.


The National Centre of Culture paid for the production of

  • the documentary ‘Letter of the Bishops’, broadcast as part of the celebrations of the 1050th anniversary of the Baptism of Poland – PLN 170,000.
  • ‘Wielki test z historii. Chrzest Polski’ – PLN 150,000
  • footage from a concert organized as part of celebrations of the ‘Cursed Soldiers’ National Remembrance Day – PLN 149,978


Overall, the National Cultural Centre contributed millions of zlotys to TVP productions in 2016. And such a situation has been repeated for years with regard to many public institutions.


Translated by Roman Wojtasz

The text was published in Polish at on 12 February 2021.


an award-winning investigative journalist and head of investigative team at



February 23, 2021


Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional TribunalPolandjudgesdisciplinary proceedingsrule of lawZbigniew ZiobroCourt of Justice of the EUNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionMałgorzata ManowskaAndrzej DudaCourt of JusticeIgor TuleyaEuropean Court of Human Rightsdisciplinary systemMinister of JusticeJarosław KaczyńskiMateusz MorawieckiCJEUmuzzle lawCommissioner for Human RightsNational Recovery PlanAdam BodnardemocracyWaldemar ŻurekPrzemysław Radzikcriminal lawpresidential electionselectionsKamil Zaradkiewiczdisciplinary commissionerPiotr Schabmedia freedomneo-judgeselections 2023judiciaryFirst President of the Supreme Courtpreliminary rulingsSupreme Administrative CourtHungaryelections 2020K 3/21Dagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaNational Council for JudiciaryharassmentJulia PrzyłębskaProsecutor GeneralprosecutorsŁukasz PiebiakMichał LasotaBeata MorawiecPaweł JuszczyszynCourt of Justice of the European UnionPrime MinisterPresidentConstitutionCOVID-19European Arrest WarrantMaciej NawackiCriminal ChamberRegional Court in KrakówRecovery FundExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberEU budgetfreedom of expressiondisciplinary liability for judgesWojciech HermelińskiMarek SafjanMałgorzata GersdorfSejmMaciej Ferekfreedom of assemblyconditionalityLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeJustice FundNational ProsecutorPiSStanisław PiotrowiczAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPresident of the Republic of PolandIustitiacourtsTHEMISimmunityAnna DalkowskaNational Public ProsecutorCouncil of Europecriminal proceedingsStanisław Biernatconditionality mechanismWłodzimierz WróbelLabour and Social Security Chambercommission on Russian influence2017policeJustice Defence Committee – KOSFreedom HouseSupreme Court PresidentArticle 7Venice CommissionPM Mateusz MorawieckiNational Electoral CommissionJarosław WyrembakAndrzej Zollacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisMay 10 2020 electionsPresident of PolandLGBTXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandReczkowicz and Others v. Polandmedia independenceKrystian MarkiewiczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczMichał WawrykiewiczArticle 6 ECHREAWUrsula von der LeyenTVPmediaLex Super OmniaLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationAndrzej StępkaPiotr GąciarekcorruptionP 7/20K 7/21Lex DudaNational Reconstruction PlanProfessional Liability ChambersuspensionparliamentJarosław DudziczChamber of Professional Liabilityelectoral codePiotr Prusinowskidemocratic backslidingdecommunizationLaw on the NCJrecommendationHuman Rights CommissionerCCBEThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europepublic opinion pollreportEuropean ParliamentZiobrointimidation of dissenterstransferretirement agePiebiak gatehuman rightsEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawcoronavirusC-791/19Piotr PszczółkowskiGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgeslex NGOcivil societyRussiaJarosław GowinLGBT ideology free zonescriminal codeSenateZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczMarcin WarchołdefamationFree CourtsEwa WrzosekEU law primacyAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independenceMaciej MiteraViktor OrbanOLAFNext Generation EUvetoabortionJózef IwulskiTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiMarek MazurkiewiczAndrzej MączyńskiJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław RymarFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersSLAPPOKO.pressDariusz ZawistowskiMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskiKrystyna PawłowiczMariusz MuszyńskiPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiMarian BanaśSupreme Audit OfficeAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyKrakówXero Flor v. PolandAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21Civil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaPegasusMariusz KamińskisurveillanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraEdyta Barańskaright to fair trialUkraineKonrad WytrykowskiJakub IwaniecDariusz DrajewiczRafał Puchalskismear campaignmilestonesConstitutional Tribunal PresidentMarzanna Piekarska-Drążekelectoral processWojciech Maczugapublic medialexTuskcourt changeselections integrityelections fairnessabuse of state resourcesPATFoxpopulismequal treatmentfundamental rightsCT PresidentEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUStanisław ZabłockiLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardWojciech SadurskijudgePechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakAmnesty Internationaltrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote billresolution of 23 January 2020Leon KieresPKWinfringment actionEU valuesENCJIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieAK judgmentSimpson judgmentForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsLeszek Mazurinterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europemedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióGazeta WyborczaPollitykaBrussels IRome IIArticle 2Forum shoppingtransparencyEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian KaletaC-156/21C-157/21Marek PiertuszyńskiNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOlsztyn courtPrzemysła CzarnekEducation MinisterIpsosOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258clientelismoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficePolish National FoundationLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykTVNjournalistslexTVNPolish mediaRzeszówborderprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczMirosław Wróblewskiright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMichał WośMinistry of FinanceJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAct sanitising the judiciaryMarek AstCourt of Appeal in KrakówPutinismKaczyńskiPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasMałgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderekct on the Protection of the Populatiolegislationlex WośRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtAntykastaStanisław ZdunIrena BochniakKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczKatarzyna ChmuraGrzegorz FurmankiewiczMarek JaskulskiJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaPaweł StyrnaKasta/AntykastaAndrzej SkowronŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoMonika FrąckowiakArkadiusz CichockiEmilia SzmydtTomasz SzmydtE-mail scandalDworczyk leaksMichał Dworczykmedia pluralism#RecoveryFilesrepairing the rule of lawBohdan BieniekMarcin KrajewskiMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsWiesław KozielewiczNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeGrzegorz PudaPiotr MazurekJerzy KwaśniewskiPetros Tovmasyancourt presidentsODIHRFull-Scale Election Observation MissionNGOKarolina MiklaszewskaRafał LisakMałgorzata FroncJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiSebastian MazurekElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikSzymon Szynkowski vel SękJoanna Scheuring-Wielgusinsulting religious feelingsoppositionAdam GendźwiłłDariusz Dończyktest of independenceTomasz KoszewskiJakub KwiecińskidiscriminationAct on the Supreme Courtelectoral commissionsEuropean Court of HuKrzysztof RączkaPoznańKoan LenaertsKarol WeitzKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFJustyna WydrzyńskaAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszJoanna KnobelCrimes of espionageextraordinary commissionZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaCourt of Appeal in WarsawOsiatyński'a ArchiveUS State DepartmentAssessment Actenvironmentinvestmentstrategic investmentgag lawsuitslex RaczkowskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActdisinformationNational Broadcasting Councilelection fairnessDobrochna Bach-GoleckaRafał WojciechowskiAleksandra RutkowskaGeneral Court of the EUArkadiusz RadwanLech WałęsaWałęsa v. Polandright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawpilot-judgmentDonald Tusk governmentSLAPPscivil lawRadosław Baszuk