The request for the arrest and compulsory detention of Ziobro has been submitted to the Polish Parliament.

Share

Journalist at OKO.press.

More

Ziobro has already been fined for failing to appear for questioning before the Pegasus Committee.



The National Prosecutor’s Office has informed that the Attorney General, Adam Bodnar, has today submitted to the Speaker of the Polish Sejm, Szymon Hołownia, a request for the Sejm’s consent to arrest and forcibly bring the Member of Parliament, Zbigniew Ziobro, to the Sejm’s Investigative Committee for the Pegasus case.

 

Now, the Sejm will have to give its consent for the arrest.

 

The request concerning Zbigniew Ziobro was submitted to the Attorney General by the Sejm’s Investigative Committee for the Pegasus case. This follows the fact that the MP and former Minister in the PiS government has twice failed to appear for questioning as a witness. Ziobro had been properly notified of the hearings. The Warsaw District Court imposed a fine of 2,000 PLN on Ziobro for his failure to appear at the first scheduled hearing.

 

What is the context?

 

The Sejm’s Investigative Committee is conducting an inquiry into the purchase and use of the Pegasus surveillance software by the PiS government, which allegedly spied on members of the opposition at the time.

 

One of the key aspects of this case is the illegal purchase of Pegasus by the Central Anti-Corruption Bureau (CBA) using funds from the Justice Fund in 2017. This is why Zbigniew Ziobro, who oversaw the Fund at the time, is a crucial witness. The former minister initially avoided questioning due to health issues, having undergone surgery for cancer last year. He claimed he was unable to testify and provided medical certificates.

 

At the end of September 2024, the Pegasus Committee appointed an expert who concluded that, under appropriate conditions, Ziobro could participate in the questioning. Ziobro himself contested this opinion. However, when it became known in October that he appeared for questioning at the prosecutor’s office in connection with a different case, the committee lost patience. A motion for a fine was passed. Now, the committee is demanding his forcible detention.

 

The decision to allocate the funds to the CBA was signed not by Zbigniew Ziobro but by Michał Woś, the then Deputy Minister of Justice responsible for the Justice Fund. Woś testified before the Pegasus Committee in March 2024, explaining that the decision was about national security, not unwarranted surveillance. In August, Woś was charged in the National Prosecutor’s Office investigation regarding irregularities in the Justice Fund, specifically in connection with the decision to allocate 25 million PLN to the CBA for the purchase of Pegasus.



Author


Journalist at OKO.press.


More

Published

November 23, 2024

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary Chamberjudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionMałgorzata ManowskaAndrzej DudaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsAdam BodnarIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemneo-judgesCJEUJarosław Kaczyńskimuzzle lawNational Recovery PlanMateusz MorawieckiCourt of Justice of the European UnionCommissioner for Human RightsdemocracyWaldemar ŻurekNational Council for JudiciaryPrzemysław RadzikelectionsJulia Przyłębskadisciplinary commissionercriminal lawpresidential electionsPiotr Schabelections 2023Kamil Zaradkiewiczmedia freedomjudiciaryHungaryprosecutionSupreme Administrative Courtpreliminary rulingsharassmentFirst President of the Supreme Courtelections 2020K 3/21Dagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaPaweł JuszczyszynPresidentBeata MorawiecNational ProsecutorŁukasz PiebiakMichał LasotaprosecutorsProsecutor GeneralRecovery FundMarek SafjanConstitutionfreedom of expressionimmunitySejmMaciej NawackiIustitiaCriminal ChamberCOVID-19European Arrest WarrantRegional Court in KrakówPrime MinisterMinistry of Justicedisciplinary liability for judgesMałgorzata GersdorfcourtsreformWojciech HermelińskiVenice CommissionEU budgetExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberMaciej FerekOSCEcommission on Russian influenceconditionality mechanismfreedom of assemblyconditionalityTHEMISJustice FundKrystian MarkiewiczcorruptionWłodzimierz WróbelJarosław DudziczStanisław PiotrowiczLaw and JusticePiSStanisław BiernatAnna DalkowskaAleksander StepkowskiNational Public ProsecutorLabour and Social Security ChamberPresident of the Republic of PolandLGBTCouncil of Europecriminal proceedingsreformsNCJKrzysztof ParchimowiczP 7/20SenateMarcin RomanowskiNational Reconstruction PlanPresident of PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandProfessional Liability Chambermedia independenceLex DudaK 7/21suspensionparliamentCivil ChamberSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramPegasusParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEAWUrsula von der LeyenTVPmediaLex Super OmniaLech Garlickielectoral codePiotr PrusinowskiabortionEwa ŁętowskaArticle 6 ECHRDidier ReyndersAmsterdam District CourtPiotr GąciarekConstitutional Tribunal PresidentdefamationAndrzej StępkaMichał WawrykiewiczChamber of Professional LiabilityChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationSLAPPNext Generation EUMay 10 2020 electionsOrdo IurisAndrzej ZollNational Electoral CommissionJarosław WyrembakPM Mateusz MorawieckiFreedom HouseJustice Defence Committee – KOSacting first president of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court PresidentArticle 72017policePiotr TulejaJerzy StępieńAndrzej RzeplińskiFerdynand RymarzStanisław RymarTeresa Dębowska-Romanowskarestoration of the rule of lawaccountabilitySławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczSupreme Audit OfficeMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiOKO.pressMarek ZubikWojciech MaczugaZiobrocourt presidentsMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaJanusz Niemcewiczintimidation of dissenterstransfervetoDariusz ZawistowskiOLAFViktor Orbanpublic mediaDariusz Kornelukinsulting religious feelingsJózef IwulskiSzymon Szynkowski vel SękAndrzej MączyńskiMarek MazurkiewiczWojciech ŁączkowskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaStefan JaworskiAdam JamrózMirosław GranatKazimierz DziałochaMaciej Miteraelectoral processtransparencyK 6/21Astradsson v IcelandrecommendationJakub IwaniecXero Flor v. PolandMariusz KamińskiKrakówstate of emergencyInternational Criminal CourtJoanna Misztal-KoneckadecommunizationJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraEdyta Barańskaright to fair trialCentral Anti-Corruption BureauLaw on the NCJsurveillanceUkraineBelarusAdam Synakiewiczsmear campaignKrystyna Pawłowiczpublic opinion pollmilestonesMarek PietruszyńskiMichał LaskowskireportMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekMariusz MuszyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeDariusz DrajewiczMarian BanaśMaciej TaborowskiPaweł FilipekRafał PuchalskiHuman Rights CommissionerKonrad WytrykowskiCCBEdemocratic backslidingjudcial independenceEU law primacyBelgiumSLAPPs11 January March in Warsawcivil societyelections integrityLGBT ideology free zoneslex NGOPiotr PszczółkowskiPiebiak gateEuropean Association of Judgeshuman rightscourt changesAdam TomczyńskiGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgescriminal codeC-791/19Jarosław GowinNetherlandsEuropean ParliamentlexTuskEwa Wrzosekabuse of state resourcesZuzanna Rudzińska-Bluszczelections fairnessBogdan ŚwięczkowskicoronavirusRussiaMarcin Warchołretirement agePATFoxFree CourtsMarek JaskulskienvironmentWiesław KozielewiczArkadiusz RadwanJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczGrzegorz FurmankiewiczinvestmentWałęsa v. PolandLech WałęsaEwa ŁąpińskaE-mail scandalOsiatyński'a ArchiveTomasz SzmydtEmilia SzmydtArkadiusz CichockiMonika FrąckowiakAssessment ActIvan MischenkoAndrzej Skowronright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawUS State DepartmentChamber of Professional ResponsibilityPaweł StyrnaKasta/AntykastaZbigniew ŁupinaThe Codification Committee of Civil LawKatarzyna Chmurastrategic investmentMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekJarosław MatrasPaulina AslanowiczKaczyńskiPutinismCourt of Appeal in Krakówsame-sex unionsRafał Wojciechowskicivil partnerships billKRSDobrochna Bach-Goleckaelection fairnessJudicial ReformsMarek AstNational Broadcasting Councilct on the Protection of the PopulatioKrystyna Morawa-Fryźlewiczlegislationcivil partnershipsGeneral Court of the EUKatarzyna KotulaIrena BochniakStanisław Zdungag lawsuitsAntykastadisinformationlex RaczkowskiAleksandra RutkowskaŁukasz BilińskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActRome Statutelex WośAct sanitising the judiciaryJakub KwiecińskiRafał LisakKarolina MiklaszewskaWatchdog PolskaPoznańDariusz BarskiKoan LenaertsAnti-SLAPP Directivejustice system reformKarol WeitzLasotaDonald TuskVěra JourováKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFMałgorzata FroncJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiSebastian MazurekdiscriminationMarcin MatczakAct on the Supreme CourtState Tribunalinsulttest of independenceNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)Dariusz Dończykelectoral commissionscodification commissionEuropean Court of HuAdam GendźwiłłdelegationsoppositionKrzysztof RączkaJoanna Scheuring-WielgusElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikJustice MinistryAction Planextraordinary commissionMarcin KrajewskiBohdan BieniekZbigniew KapińskiC‑718/21repairing the rule of lawpreliminary referenceEU lawethicsDonald Tusk governmentAnna Głowacka#RecoveryFilespilot-judgmentmedia pluralismMichał DworczykDworczyk leaksTomasz KoszewskiPiotr HofmańskiMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakHater ScandalJustyna WydrzyńskaNGOFull-Scale Election Observation MissionODIHRAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekNational Council for the JudiciaryGrzegorz PudaHelsinki Foundation for Human RightsNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeRadosław BaszukJoanna KnobelCrimes of espionagecivil lawCourt of Appeal in WarsawEU valuesGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikElżbieta KarskaJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarnekhate speechhate crimesENCJIsraelforeign agents lawWojciech SadurskiOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationlegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsSimpson judgmentAK judgmentOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieLeszek Mazurinfringment actionpopulismLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsStanisław ZabłockiCouncil of the EUequal treatmentfundamental rightsCT PresidentEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitWorld Justice Project awardjudgePechKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote billresolution of 23 January 2020Leon Kieresrepressive actAct of 20 December 2019KochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakAmnesty Internationaltrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersPKWIpsosLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykTVNjournalistslexTVNPolish mediaRzeszówborderPolish National FoundationEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficeOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258clientelismoligarchic systemprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawErnest BejdaJacek SasinSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczMirosław Wróblewskiright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMichał WośMinistry of FinancePorozumienie dla PraworządnościEducation Ministerinterim measuresC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service Actmedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruCelmerGermanyautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huSebastian KaletaC-156/21C-157/21Marek PiertuszyńskiNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOlsztyn courtEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeForum shoppingTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióGazeta WyborczaPollitykaBrussels IRome IIArticle 2Przemysła Czarnek