The Prosecution to Appeal Court’s Decision to Release Marcin Romanowski

Share

Journalist at OKO.press.

More

Investigators believe that the District Court for Warsaw-Mokotów made an error in releasing from custody the former Deputy Minister, who is being charged by the prosecutor's office in connection with his oversight of the Justice Fund.



On the morning of Tuesday, July 23, Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar announced on TOK FM radio his intention to file an appeal.

 

“I believe there are very serious arguments indicating that immunity simply does not apply,” he stated.

 

Adam Bodnar also cited the opinions of experts—Professors Andrzej Zoll and Marek Safjan—who asserted that in this situation, “there is a usurpation of competence by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, because the act of which Mr. Romanowski is suspected has nothing to do with activities in the Council of Europe.”

 

“Immunity applied in the context of performing functions in the national parliament […] I am convinced that there is no immunity from the Parliamentary Assembly; it is being overly interpreted,” emphasized the Minister of Justice.

 

On July 16, just before midnight, the District Court for Warsaw-Mokotów released Marcin Romanowski from custody. According to the justification of the decision obtained by OKO.press, Judge Agata Pomianowska did not analyze the charges against Romanowski (totaling 11) or the grounds for pre-trial detention. The court only examined whether the request for pre-trial detention was formally admissible and concluded that it was not, due to Romanowski’s immunity as a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

 

To recap: After the detention and interrogation of Romanowski—a former Deputy Minister of Justice responsible for the Justice Fund—on July 15, his defense attorney informed the Chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly. On July 16, Theodoros Rousopoulos sent a letter to Szymon Hołownia, warning that Romanowski was entitled to immunity as a member of the Parliamentary Assembly. The prosecutor’s office believed that revoking the immunity by the Polish Sejm was sufficient for his detention—a decision made on July 12.

 

Judge Pomianowska did not independently analyze whether Romanowski was protected by the second immunity. She stated that since there were conflicting opinions on the matter, she was compelled to resolve the issue in favor of the suspect.

 

The prosecutor’s office believes this decision is erroneous.

 

Awaiting the Council of Europe

 

Meanwhile, after the debacle of Romanowski’s release from custody, the National Prosecutor’s Office provided the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe with additional information about the ongoing investigation and the charges against Romanowski.

 

In a response dated July 19, Theodoros Rousopoulos reiterated that Marcin Romanowski possesses a second immunity, which Polish authorities cannot ignore. He also provided the National Prosecutor Dariusz Korneluk with instructions on how to revoke the immunity of a member of the Parliamentary Assembly.

 

The request should first be directed to the Chairman of the Assembly. It is announced at a plenary session (or a meeting of the Standing Committee if it occurs earlier than the plenary session). It is then referred to the Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities, and Institutional Affairs, which should promptly consider the request and prepare a draft resolution.

 

“Immediately after you submit a request to revoke the immunity granted to Mr. Romanowski due to his membership in the Parliamentary Assembly, I can initiate the necessary internal procedures to consider this request in accordance with Article 73 of the Rules of Procedure, which I attach for your reference,” assured Rousopoulos.

 

The Greek emphasized that the Rules Committee would check whether the conditions for revoking immunity are met. It will not address the merits of the case or determine guilt or innocence. Instead, it will consider whether the judicial proceedings do not threaten the proper functioning of the Parliamentary Assembly and whether the request is solely for the purpose of dispensing justice.

 

According to the letter from the Chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly, the earliest the Assembly can decide on immunity is at the plenary session scheduled for September 30-October 4.

Immunity protects against charges

 

At a press conference on July 17, Prosecutor Korneluk defended himself against accusations of a failed investigative action. He emphasized that the prosecutor’s office independently analyzed the regulations and relied on legal opinions commissioned by the Ministry of Justice.

 

The authors of the opinions, Dr. Hab. Andrzej Jackiewicz and Dr. Hab. Joanna Juchniewicz, stated that when a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe is on the territory of their country, they are protected only by national immunity. Therefore, there is no need to revoke the immunity of the Parliamentary Assembly.

 

Both experts also pointed out that the rules regarding the immunity of the Parliamentary Assembly are unclear. Thus, the final decision in this matter rests with the courts.

 

The National Prosecutor warned that the prosecutor’s office would review the court’s decision to release Romanowski and would likely appeal it. Korneluk did not rule out that if this decision were upheld by the appellate court, they would request the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe to consent to the revocation of Romanowski’s immunity.

 

The investigative team No. 2 of the National Prosecutor’s Office is demanding the arrest of Romanowski in connection with the scandal in the Justice Fund. The prosecutor’s office charges Romanowski—currently a member of Sovereign Poland and previously a deputy minister in the ministry led by Zbigniew Ziobro—with 11 counts related to his supervision of the Fund. Among these are charges of participating in an organized criminal group, abuse of power, and causing significant harm to the State Treasury (nearly PLN 112 million).

 

The Presidium of the Sejm of the 10th term on December 19, 2023, approved the party quotas for deputies-delegates to international institutions. In the case of the Parliamentary Assembly, it agreed on three representatives and three deputy representatives from the PiS club. On January 18, 2024, it agreed that one of the delegates (a deputy member of the Parliamentary Assembly) would be Marcin Romanowski—following the custom of not questioning the selection of delegation members by individual parties. He has held this position since January 22.

 

The Ministry of Justice, under the leadership of Adam Bodnar, began examining the issue of immunity at the end of 2023. Dr. Hab. Jackiewicz, the author of one of the two opinions commissioned by the ministry, recalls that the ministry authorities commissioned it on December 20, 2023.

 

The above text by Maria Pankowska was published in OKO.press on July 23.

https://oko.press/prokuratura-zaskarzy-decyzje-sadu-o-uwolnieniu-marcina-romanowskiego



Author


Journalist at OKO.press.


More

Published

July 30, 2024

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary Chamberjudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the JudiciaryCourt of Justice of the EUjudicial independenceEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsAdam BodnarIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemmuzzle lawJarosław KaczyńskiNational Recovery PlanCJEUMateusz Morawieckineo-judgesCommissioner for Human RightsCourt of Justice of the European UnionPrzemysław RadzikWaldemar ŻurekdemocracyNational Council for JudiciaryPiotr Schabelectionspresidential electionsKamil ZaradkiewiczJulia Przyłębskamedia freedomcriminal lawelections 2023disciplinary commissionerharassmentprosecutionSupreme Administrative CourtHungaryelections 2020preliminary rulingsjudiciaryDagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaK 3/21First President of the Supreme CourtPaweł JuszczyszynNational ProsecutorRecovery FundPresidentMichał LasotaProsecutor GeneralŁukasz PiebiakBeata MorawiecprosecutorsEuropean Arrest Warrantfreedom of expressionConstitutionPrime MinisterSejmimmunityMaciej NawackiIustitiaRegional Court in KrakówCriminal ChamberCOVID-19Maciej FerekOSCEMałgorzata GersdorfcourtsVenice CommissionMarek SafjanMinistry of JusticeExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberEU budgetdisciplinary liability for judgesWojciech HermelińskiPiSNCJKrystian MarkiewiczStanisław PiotrowiczPresident of the Republic of PolandAleksander Stepkowskicommission on Russian influenceJustice FundTHEMISLabour and Social Security ChamberLaw and JusticeNational Public ProsecutorCouncil of Europecriminal proceedingsconditionalitycorruptionStanisław BiernatreformsAnna Dalkowskafreedom of assemblyconditionality mechanismWłodzimierz WróbelsuspensionPiotr GąciarekOrdo IurisReczkowicz and Others v. PolandparliamentMarcin RomanowskiAndrzej Stępkamedia independenceChamber of Professional LiabilityBroda and Bojara v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandP 7/20K 7/21LGBTPresident of PolandNational Reconstruction PlanJarosław DudziczLex DudaProfessional Liability ChamberMay 10 2020 electionsStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationPiotr PrusinowskidefamationLex Super OmniamediaUrsula von der LeyenKrzysztof ParchimowiczEAWabortionMichał Wawrykiewiczelectoral codeAmsterdam District CourtNext Generation EUSLAPPConstitutional Tribunal PresidentDidier ReyndersTVPEwa ŁętowskaSenateParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeLech GarlickiSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramArticle 6 ECHRAndrzej ZollNational Electoral CommissionFreedom HouseJarosław WyrembakJustice Defence Committee – KOSreformArticle 7acting first president of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court President2017PM Mateusz MorawieckipolicePiotr TulejaJerzy StępieńAndrzej RzeplińskiFerdynand RymarzStanisław RymarMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaDariusz ZawistowskiOKO.pressreportSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskiMarek ZubikDariusz KornelukMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekEuropean Parliamentmilestoneselectoral processAndrzej MączyńskiJózef IwulskiWojciech MaczugavetoOLAFViktor OrbanSzymon Szynkowski vel SękMaciej Miterajudcial independencecourt presidentsJanusz NiemcewiczTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaMarek MazurkiewiczZiobroMirosław GranatWojciech ŁączkowskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaStefan JaworskiAdam JamrózKazimierz Działochainsulting religious feelingsrestoration of the rule of lawright to fair trialXero Flor v. PolandLaw on the NCJKrakówstate of emergencydecommunizationBelarusAdam SynakiewiczAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21Joanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraCentral Anti-Corruption BureausurveillanceMariusz KamińskiPegasusEdyta BarańskaJoanna Misztal-KoneckaCivil ChamberUkraineSupreme Audit OfficeMarian BanaśKrystyna PawłowiczCCBERafał PuchalskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeMarek PietruszyńskiMichał Laskowskipublic opinion pollsmear campaignMariusz MuszyńskiHuman Rights CommissionerMaciej TaborowskiPaweł FilipekInternational Criminal CourtKonrad WytrykowskirecommendationaccountabilityJakub IwaniecDariusz DrajewicztransparencyFree CourtsBohdan Zdziennickiretirement ageSLAPPsPATFoxLGBT ideology free zoneslexTuskAdam Tomczyński11 January March in Warsawabuse of state resourcesEuropean Association of Judgespublic mediaEwa Wrzosekcourt changesC-791/19democratic backslidingcoronavirushuman rightscriminal codePiebiak gateelections fairnessZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczJarosław GowinEU law primacyPiotr PszczółkowskiBelgiumtransferNetherlandscivil societyRussiaBogdan Święczkowskielections integrityintimidation of dissentersMarcin Warchołlex NGOGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszCrimes of espionageNCBiRJoanna KnobelKasta/AntykastaThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentHater ScandalPaweł StyrnaGrzegorz FurmankiewiczDariusz BarskiJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczJustyna WydrzyńskaKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczEwa ŁąpińskaIrena BochniakZbigniew ŁupinaNational Broadcasting CouncilKatarzyna ChmuraStanisław ZdunLasotaAntykastaEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFMarek JaskulskiRome StatuteCourt of Appeal in Warsawlex RaczkowskiCourt of Appeal in KrakówNational Council for the JudiciaryMarek Astgag lawsuitsAssessment ActAct sanitising the judiciaryenvironmentPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAgreement for the Rule of LawMaria Ejchart-DuboisPaulina Kieszkowska-Knapikstrategic investmentPiotr HofmańskiUS State DepartmentPutinismKaczyńskilex Wośdisinformationextraordinary commissionlegislationthe Spy ActZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaHelsinki Foundation for Human RightsinvestmentMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekOsiatyński'a ArchiveJarosław MatrasPaulina AslanowiczPiotr Raczkowskict on the Protection of the PopulatioAndrzej SkowronoppositionDariusz DończykPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekGrzegorz PudaNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeinsultState TribunalDonald Tusk governmenttest of independencepilot-judgmentVěra JourováTomasz Koszewskiright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawJakub KwiecińskidiscriminationAnti-SLAPP DirectiveODIHRcivil lawDonald TuskJustice MinistryJoanna Scheuring-WielgusAction PlanAdam GendźwiłłElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikSebastian Mazurekjustice system reformJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiEuropean Court of HuMałgorzata FroncRafał LisakKarolina MiklaszewskaRadosław BaszukNGOFull-Scale Election Observation MissionWałęsa v. PolandAct on the Supreme CourtLech WałęsaMichał DworczykDworczyk leaksAleksandra RutkowskaE-mail scandalRafał WojciechowskidelegationsTomasz SzmydtEmilia SzmydtWatchdog PolskaArkadiusz CichockiKaspryszyn v PolandDobrochna Bach-GoleckaMonika FrąckowiakNCR&Delection fairnessIvan Mischenkomedia pluralism#RecoveryFilesWiesław Kozielewiczelectoral commissionsMarcin MatczakChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakArkadiusz RadwanMarcin KrajewskiBohdan BieniekGeneral Court of the EUKrzysztof Rączkarepairing the rule of lawPoznańNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)Koan Lenaertscodification commissionKarol WeitzŁukasz BilińskiPKWhate speechGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikElżbieta KarskaJacek Czaputowiczhate crimesChamber of Extraordinary Verificationinfringment actionEU valuesENCJIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceAK judgmentSimpson judgmentpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawOpenbaar MinisterieRegional Court in AmsterdamENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRUnited NationsLeon KierespopulismLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsStanisław ZabłockiCouncil of the EUequal treatmentfundamental rightsCT PresidentEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitWorld Justice Project awardWojciech SadurskiAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote billlawyersLSOjudgePechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakAmnesty Internationaltrans-Atlantic valuesresolution of 23 January 2020Olsztyn courtoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficePolish National FoundationLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykTVNjournalistslexTVNclientelismArticle 258Przemysła CzarnekEducation MinisterIpsosOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumPolish mediaRzeszówMichał WośMinistry of FinanceJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitRoman GiertychWiktor JoachimkowskiborderprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczMirosław Wróblewskiright to protestSławomir JęksaDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandTribunal of StateLeszek MazurCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActForum Współpracy Sędziówmedia taxGermanyMariusz Krasońinterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandadvertising taxmediabezwyboruArticle 2Forum shoppingEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian KaletaC-156/21C-157/21Marek PiertuszyńskiNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiRome IIBrussels IJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióGazeta WyborczaPollitykaDisicplinary Chamber