The National Council of the Judiciary gave the member of this group another chance of promotion


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


The National Council of the Judiciary gave the member of this group another chance of promotion. The Olsztyn-based Judge Maciej Nawacki may soon become a regional court judge. Whereas the Council itself will have an increasingly lesser representation of the district courts.

by Wojciech Tumidalski


The text was pubslihed in Polish in Rzeczpospolita on 24 September 2020.


Fortune is smiling again at Judge Nawacki, who publicly tore up a draft resolution submitted to him in February during an assembly of judges – for which he was supposed to receive a disciplinary punishment. The rising wave has returned. He recently became a member of the judicial ethics committee at the NCJ, whereas he has now won again in the contest organised by this council for a position in Olsztyn’s regional court. And it appears that the legal world is treating this ostentation as of an everyday occurrence.


Judge Nawacki’s opponents are now to have disciplinary proceedings, having expressed their critical views about the constitutionality and legality of the Council during their interviews at the NCJ. Its member, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, MP, demanded that the presidium of the NCJ ask the judicial disciplinary commissioner to take a closer look at these statements. This is how the law referred to as the Muzzle Act works.


This is not Judge Nawacki’s first attempt at promotion. The result of the contest was cancelled last time by the new Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber of the Supreme Court, specifying that the assessment of his judicial service by the other members of the NCJ did not satisfy the statutory requirements – which may be considered to mean a lack of impartiality and independence. Judicial promotions also include pay rises – it never looks good when colleagues award them to their colleagues.


Interestingly, the opinion issued by the NCJ does not mention a breach of the principles of independence and impartiality by Maciej Nawacki’s membership (since 2017) of the Lech Kaczyński Academic Civic Club in Olsztyn. Meanwhile, it could be construed that a few more years were needed for the candidate to eliminate the shortcomings in his judgments in business cases – and then there is a chance “of making thought-out and prudent decisions”.


However, Judge Nawacki’s path to promotion could be faster if neither of his rivals were to appeal to the Supreme Court – because there are two posts to be filled in Olsztyn. And everything will be in the hands of President Andrzej Duda. He can hand out the promotions – as to the members of the NCJ, Grzegorz Furmankiewicz and Dagmara Pawełczyk-Woicka. We also know that he can delay this – as with the decisions regarding Dariusz Drajewicz and Rafał Puchalski, who want to be judges of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the NCJ will represent district court judges to an increasingly lesser extent – which was the justification for the changes – and will increasingly represent the offices of the Ministry of Justice.


In the meantime, although some may find it tempting, the president will no doubt not tear up the nomination.


Translated by Roman Wojtasz


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland



September 29, 2020


Supreme Courtdisciplinary proceedingsrule of lawjudicial independenceDisciplinary ChamberPolandEuropean CommissionjudgesNational Council of the JudiciaryZbigniew ZiobroCourt of JusticeCourt of Justice of the EUConstitutional TribunalAndrzej DudaEuropean Uniondisciplinary systemIgor TuleyaMinister of Justicepresidential electionsjudiciarydemocracyJarosław Kaczyńskielections 2020Beata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme Courtpreliminary rulingsprosecutorsCJEUmuzzle lawCommissioner for Human RightsEuropean Arrest WarrantCOVID-19disciplinary commissionerAdam BodnarOSCEEuropean Court of Human RightsMateusz MorawieckiPresidentProsecutor Generalfreedom of expressionLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJHungaryNational Prosecutorelectionsacting first president of the Supreme CourtMay 10 2020 electionsWaldemar Żurekmedia independenceAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczEAW2017freedom of assemblyFreedom HouseExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberVenice CommissionEU budgetConstitutioncriminal lawC-791/19disciplinary liability for judgesNational Electoral CommissionMarek SafjanKamil ZaradkiewiczGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesAleksander StepkowskiOrdo IurisPresident of PolandMałgorzata ManowskaJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesSejmMichał LasotaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramTHEMISMaciej NawackiLex Super OmniaPaweł JuszczyszynAnna DalkowskaBelgiumNetherlandsNational Public ProsecutorPiotr Schabdemocratic backslidingdecommunizationNext Generation EUPrime MinistervetopoliceJulia PrzyłębskaLaw on the NCJrecommendationHuman Rights CommissionerCCBEThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropereportArticle 7European ParliamentZiobroSupreme Administrative CourtconditionalityPM Mateusz MorawieckiEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawMinistry of JusticecoronavirusPiSWojciech Hermelińskiresolution of 23 January 2020Stanisław PiotrowiczPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakLeon KieresAndrzej ZollPKWMałgorzata Gersdorfinfringment actionEU valuesENCJlex NGOcivil societyRussiaIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtPresident of the Republic of PolandLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechcriminal codeGrzęda v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawIustitiaKrystian MarkiewiczPrzemysła RadzikSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekdefamationcourtsOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsC-487/19Article 6 ECHRArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieUrsula von der LeyenEwa WrzosekAK judgmentSimpson judgmentEU law primacyForum Współpracy SędziówTVPmediapublic broadcasterAdam Tomczyńskiimmunitymutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamBogdan ŚwięczkowskiPrzemysław Radzikthe Regional Court in WarsawCouncil of EuropeUnited Nationsjudcial independenceLeszek MazurMaciej Miteracriminal proceedingspopulisminterim measuresViktor OrbanOLAFautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentJózef IwulskiGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUJustice Defence Committee – KOSC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justicepublic opinion pollSupreme Court President2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUStanisław ZabłockiLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskijudgetransferPechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakretirement ageAmnesty InternationalŁukasz PiebiakPiebiak gatehuman rightstrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakJustice FundGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote bill