The European Court of Human Rights will assess whether President Duda broke the law

Share

Co-founder and editor of Rule of Law in Poland and The Wiktor Osiatyński Archive, a rule of law monitoring project,…

More

The European Court of Human Rights will rule on the cases of eight people who were recommended by the ‘old’, legal National Council of the Judiciary to the Supreme Court, among others, whereas President Duda refused to appoint them without giving reasons.



The European Court of Human Rights informed the Polish authorities that it will hear the applications of eight judges who the legal National Council of the Judiciary recommended in 2016 and 2017 to senior judicial positions, including to the Supreme Court, but who President Andrzej Duda refused to appoint without giving reasons,

 

This is about nominations of the judges to the Supreme Court, the Voivodship Administrative Court, the Regional Court and the Military Regional Court. The President delayed issuing decisions in these cases until December 2021. He then issued his decisions without a justification.

 

The ECtHR will examine Kaspryszyn v Poland (application no. 35890/22) as a priority case – just like the other applications regarding systemic rule of law problems in Poland.

 

The Polish government has until 29 March to present its position. The Justice Defence Committee (KOS) is representing the applicants.

 

The ECtHR has more than 100 cases regarding judicial independence and the operation of the justice system in Poland. Complaints about breaches of the right to a trial in court, the right to a remedy and a breach of reputation.

 

The ‘old’ National Council of the Judiciary, elected on a basis that was compliant with the Constitution, recommended:

  • Professor Aleksander Kappes and Professor Wojciech Kocot, as well as Appeal Court Judges Janusz Kaspryszyn and Małgorzata Polanska-Farion to the Supreme Court; 
  • Judge Grzegorz Borkowski to the Voivodship Administrative Court;
  • Judges Agnieszka Łukaszuk, Grzegorz Miśkiewicz and Tomasz Wojciechowski to the Court of Appeal;
  • Judges Krzysztof Ptasiewicz and Piotr Raczkowski to the Regional Court;
  • Judge Rafał Buchajczuk to the Regional Military Court.

 

The ten recommended by the NCJ filed an application with the ECtHR regarding the Polish President’s decisions refusing to appoint them to judicial positions. The decisions, which were dated 27 December 2021, were published on 10 January 2022.

 

The ECtHR informed the Polish authorities on 1 June 2022 that it would examine the complaints of the professors of law – Professor Wojciech Kocot from the University of Warsaw and Professor Aleksander Kappes from the University of Łódź.

 

Now, the ECtHR has announced that it will examine the complaints of eight judges in a single case. They apply to the same facts and the applicants are raising the same allegations of breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights in them.

 

The applicants allege that their rights, which are protected by Article 6 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial) and Article 13 of the Convention (the right to an effective remedy), were breached because they could not appeal against the President’s decision.

 

They also claim that Article 8 of the Convention (the right to respect for private and family life) was breached, arguing that the Polish President’s prolonged silence with regard to the recommendation of the NCJ as to their nominations and the President’s decision refusing to appoint them breached their good names.

 

The ECtHR finds for the Polish judges 

 

The Court has been successively – and as a priority – ruling on cases regarding the systemic changes in the judiciary since 2015, including numerous cases filed by judges.

 

In all of its rulings to date, it found for the applicant judges and ruled that the Polish authorities had breached the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. It has also awarded the applicants tens of thousands of euros in damages.

 

 

The rulings applied to the premature termination of the term of office of members of the old National Council of the Judiciary (case of judges Jan Grzęda and Waldemar Żurek), the premature termination of the term of office of the vice-presidents of the Regional Court in Kielce (cases of judges Mariusz Broda and Alina Bojara), adjudication in the cases of the judges by the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court (cases of Judges Monika Dolińska-Ficek and Artur Ozimek) and the suspension of a judge by the Disciplinary Chamber (the case of Judge Paweł Juszczyszyn).

 

Furthermore, the ECtHR also issued a number of interim measures in cases filed by judges. These oblige the Polish authorities to refrain from taking action that the applicants believe breaches their rights, which are protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, until the Court issues a ruling. The ECtHR has issued (several times in several cases) freezing orders in the cases of Judges:

 

  • Włodzimierz Wróbel;
  • Marzanna Piekarska-Drążek;
  • Adam Synkiewicz, Agnieszka Niklas-Bibik and Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora;
  • Anna Głowacka;
  • Andrzej Stępka; 
  • Tomasz Zawiślak;
  • Piotr Raczkowski, Aleksandra Janas and Andrzej Sterkowicz;
  • Waldemar Żurek;
  • Ewa Leszczyńska-Furtak and Ewa Gregajtys.

Applications waiting for consideration

 

The following are among those that are waiting for examination by the Court:

 

  • applications regarding President Kaczyński’s and President Duda’s refusal to appoint judges filed by Judge Joanna Sobczyńska (no. 62765/14) and other judges (nos. 62769/14, 62772/14 and 11708/18);
  • three applications filed by Judge Igor Tuleya regarding the lifting of his immunity by the Disciplinary Chamber, disciplinary proceedings and the refusal to allow him to work;
  • applications of judges regarding suspension by the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court filed by Judges Maciej Ferek (no. 22591/22), Piotr Gąciarek (no. 27444/22), Maciej Rutkowicz (no. 18380/22) and Krzysztof Chmielewski (no. 323017/22);
  • applications of judges regarding suspension by the Minister of Justice filed by Judges Adam Synkiewicz, Marta Pilśnik, Agnieszka Niklas-Bibik, Marzanna Piekarska-Drążek, Joanna Hetnarowicz-Sikora and Anna Głowacka;
  • applications of judges for harassment for issuing rulings and defending the rule of law filed by Judges Waldemar Żurek, Łukasz Biliński, Piotr Gąciarek, Agnieszka Niklas-Bibik, Maciej Czajka, Beata Morawiec, Wojciech Maczuga, Katarzyna Wierzbicka, Anna Ptaszek, Paweł Juszczyszyn, Ewa Leszczyńska-Furtak and Ewa Gregajtys.

 

The article was published in Polish in OKO.press, February 13, 2023.



Author


Co-founder and editor of Rule of Law in Poland and The Wiktor Osiatyński Archive, a rule of law monitoring project,…


More

Published

February 17, 2023

Tags

Supreme CourtConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary ChamberPolandjudgesdisciplinary proceedingsrule of lawZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the JudiciaryCourt of Justice of the EUjudicial independenceEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaCourt of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsMinister of JusticeIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemAdam Bodnarmuzzle lawJarosław KaczyńskiNational Recovery PlanCJEUMateusz MorawieckiCommissioner for Human Rightsneo-judgesCourt of Justice of the European UniondemocracyPrzemysław RadzikWaldemar ŻurekNational Council for Judiciarypresidential electionselectionselections 2023disciplinary commissionercriminal lawJulia PrzyłębskaPiotr SchabKamil Zaradkiewiczmedia freedomharassmentpreliminary rulingsHungarySupreme Administrative Courtelections 2020K 3/21Dagmara Pawełczyk-WoickajudiciaryFirst President of the Supreme CourtŁukasz PiebiakprosecutorsPresidentRecovery FundBeata MorawiecPaweł JuszczyszynProsecutor GeneralMichał Lasotafreedom of expressionMaciej NawackiEuropean Arrest WarrantSejmprosecutionCOVID-19Regional Court in KrakówCriminal ChamberNational ProsecutorConstitutionPrime MinisterMinistry of JusticecourtsMałgorzata GersdorfMarek SafjanEU budgetdisciplinary liability for judgesMaciej FerekOSCEWojciech HermelińskiExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberIustitiacriminal proceedingsWłodzimierz WróbelVenice Commissionconditionality mechanismAleksander StepkowskiTHEMISLabour and Social Security ChamberStanisław BiernatPiScommission on Russian influenceStanisław PiotrowiczPresident of the Republic of PolandNCJimmunityconditionalityAnna DalkowskaJustice FundcorruptionLaw and JusticeNational Public ProsecutorCouncil of Europefreedom of assemblyKrystian MarkiewiczreformsReczkowicz and Others v. PolandKrzysztof Parchimowiczacting first president of the Supreme Court2017policeSenateAndrzej Zollmedia independenceSLAPPdefamationStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationLGBTJustice Defence Committee – KOSEwa ŁętowskaDidier ReyndersFreedom HouseAmsterdam District CourtMay 10 2020 electionsXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandOrdo IurisPresident of PolandAndrzej StępkaBroda and Bojara v PolandSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramPiotr GąciarekJarosław WyrembakPM Mateusz MorawieckiArticle 7Next Generation EUConstitutional Tribunal PresidentUrsula von der LeyenLex DudaTVPmediaLex Super OmniaProfessional Liability ChamberreformJarosław DudziczK 7/21National Reconstruction PlansuspensionparliamentChamber of Professional LiabilityEAWArticle 6 ECHRP 7/20Supreme Court PresidentLech GarlickiMichał WawrykiewiczabortionPiotr PrusinowskiNational Electoral Commissionelectoral codeJanusz NiemcewiczTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaStanisław RymarMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaKazimierz DziałochaBogdan ŚwięczkowskiNetherlandsAndrzej MączyńskiMarek MazurkiewiczvetoStefan JaworskiMirosław GranatOLAFBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaViktor OrbanJózef IwulskiMaciej MiteraSLAPPsjudcial independenceWojciech ŁączkowskiAdam JamrózPATFoxFerdynand RymarzKonrad WytrykowskiRafał Puchalskismear campaignmilestonesKrakówMarzanna Piekarska-Drążekstate of emergencyUkraineelectoral processBelaruscourt presidentsAdam SynakiewiczXero Flor v. PolandAstradsson v Icelandright to fair trialEdyta BarańskaJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraCentral Anti-Corruption BureauJakub IwaniecsurveillancePegasusDariusz DrajewiczJoanna Misztal-KoneckaCivil ChamberK 6/21Wojciech MaczugaSzymon Szynkowski vel SękDariusz ZawistowskiOKO.presselections integrityelections fairnessMarek ZubikBohdan ZdziennickiMirosław WyrzykowskiSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczPiotr TulejaJerzy StępieńAndrzej RzeplińskitransparencyMariusz KamińskiMaciej Taborowskiinsulting religious feelingsPaweł Filipekpublic mediaMariusz MuszyńskiKrystyna PawłowiczlexTuskcourt changesMarek PietruszyńskiMichał LaskowskiSupreme Audit Officeabuse of state resourcesLaw on the NCJEuropean ParliamentJarosław GowincoronavirusRussiaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczFree Courts11 January March in WarsawCCBEPiebiak gatehuman rightsrecommendationC-791/19Human Rights CommissionerMarcin WarchołLGBT ideology free zonesreportEuropean Association of JudgesPiotr Pszczółkowskiretirement agedecommunizationGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgesintimidation of dissentersdemocratic backslidingpublic opinion pollZiobroEU law primacyMarian BanaśThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europecriminal codeBelgiumlex NGOEwa Wrzosekcivil societytransferAdam Tomczyńskimedia pluralismBohdan Bieniek#RecoveryFilesFrans TimmermansLIBE Committeerepairing the rule of lawUS Department of StateMarcin KrajewskiKarolina Miklaszewska2018NGOFull-Scale Election Observation MissionODIHRNations in TransitStanisław ZabłockiPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekGrzegorz PudaNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeWiesław KozielewiczChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakCouncil of the EURafał LisakMichał DworczykWojciech Sadurskidefamatory statementsRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtC-619/18Rights and Values Programmejudgepress releaseAntykastalex WoślegislationCourt of Appeal in KrakówPutinismKaczyńskiPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasMałgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderekct on the Protection of the PopulatioWorld Justice Project awardStanisław ZdunIrena BochniakKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczMonika FrąckowiakArkadiusz CichockiEmilia SzmydtTomasz SzmydtE-mail scandalAndrzej SkowronKasta/AntykastaKatarzyna Chmuraadvocate generalGrzegorz FurmankiewiczMarek JaskulskiEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaPaweł StyrnaSwieczkowskiDworczyk leaksMałgorzata FroncHater ScandalAleksandra RutkowskaGeneral Court of the EUArkadiusz RadwanLech WałęsaWałęsa v. Polandright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawpilot-judgmentDonald Tusk governmentRafał WojciechowskiDobrochna Bach-Goleckalex RaczkowskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActdisinformationCT Presidentfundamental rightsNational Broadcasting Councilelection fairnessequal treatmentcivil lawMarcin MatczakDariusz KornelukNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)codification commissiondelegationsWatchdog PolskaDariusz BarskiLasotapopulismState TribunalRadosław BaszukAction PlanJustice MinistryVěra JourováDonald Tuskjustice system reformAnti-SLAPP Directiveinsultgag lawsuitsstrategic investmentinvestmentlustrationJakub KwiecińskidiscriminationAct on the Supreme Courtelectoral commissionsEuropean Court of HuKrzysztof RączkaPoznańTomasz Koszewskitest of independenceSebastian MazurekElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikJoanna Scheuring-WielgusoppositionThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentAdam Gendźwiłłtransitional justiceDariusz DończykKoan LenaertsKarol WeitzZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaCourt of Appeal in WarsawOsiatyński'a ArchiveEUUS State DepartmentAssessment Actenvironmentextraordinary commissionWhite PaperKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiREuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFJustyna WydrzyńskaAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszJoanna KnobelCrimes of espionageJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiMarek Piertuszyńskihate speechhate crimesmedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandPrzemysław CzarnekJacek CzaputowiczMarcin RomanowskiElżbieta KarskaPrzemysła Radzikmedia lawRafał TrzaskowskiSobczyńska and Others v PolandTelex.huJelenForum shoppingFirst President of the Suprme CourtEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian KaletaOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeC-156/21C-157/21foreign agents lawArticle 2Rome IIJózsef SzájerChamber of Extraordinary VerificationKlubrádióequalityGazeta WyborczaLGBT free zonesPollitykaBrussels Ilegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekAK judgmentautocratizationMultiannual Financial FrameworkOpenbaar MinisterieRegional Court in Amsterdamabortion rulingArticle 10 ECHRprotestsinterim measuresLeszek MazurIrena MajcherAmsterdamLMmutual trustthe Regional Court in Warsawpublic broadcasterUnited NationsForum Współpracy Sędziówthe NetherlandsDenmarkact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsNorwegian fundsNorwayKraśnikOmbudsmanKarlsruheAusl 301 AR 104/19SwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońC-487/19GermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUIrelandMarek AstLSOright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman Giertychtrans-Atlantic valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinancelawyersMirosław Wróblewskirepressive actborderprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczAct of 20 December 2019Amnesty InternationalJacek SasinEvgeni TanchevKochenovPechPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAct sanitising the judiciaryFreedom in the WorldECJErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitFrackowiakDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandRzeszówKoen LenaertsharrassmentOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeinfringment actionHudocPKWKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr BurasLeon KieresIpsosEU valuesNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOlsztyn courtPrzemysła CzarnekEducation MinisterENCJauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258postal voteTVNjournalistslexTVNEwa MaciejewskaGerard BirgfellerPolish mediaAlina CzubieniakSimpson judgmentpostal vote billclientelismoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officeresolution of 23 January 2020Polish National FoundationLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykIsrael