Tag: Xero Flor v. Poland
Polish Ombudsman’s arguments ignored by captured Constitutional Tribunal at hearing in case K 6/21
The Polish politically captured Constitutional Tribunal ruled in case K 6 /21 that it is not a court within the meaning of the European Convention on Human Rights. It also ruled that the European Court of Human Rights cannot judge the legality of judicial appointments. We publish argumentation presented in the case before the Constitutional Tribunal by the Commissioner for Human Rights.
Committee of Legal Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences resolution on the Constitutional Tribunal’s ruling of 7 October
The Committee on Legal Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences: the ruling of the Constitutional Tribunal in case K 3/21 of October 7, 2021 is defective due to the faulty appointment of judges and aims to legalize unconstitutional changes introduced in the administration of justice after 2015 which are inconsistent with EU law and the European Convention
Newest posts
18.11.2024
The Case of an Antisemitic Post by Judge Jarosław Dudzicz, Former Member of the unlawful National Council of the Judiciary
15.11.2024
Codification Committee: Abolish Two Chambers of the Supreme Court Created by PiS and the Extraordinary Complaint Mechanism
13.11.2024
EU Court of Justice does not allow questions asked by neo-judges of the Supreme Court
23.10.2024
Civil Partnerships. Kotula: PSL Colleagues, Read the Bill and Stop Making Politics Out of People’s Suffering
23.10.2024
The Commissioner for Human Rights Urges Donald Tusk to Consider the Venice Commission’s Opinion on Judicial Reforms
18.10.2024