Tag: European Commission




Bodnar’s Action Plan. How to restore the rule of law and unblock funds for the National Recovery and Resilience Plan [DETAILS]

Adam Bodnar presented a plan to the European Commission for fixing the justice system after the PiS government. This is a package of 10 acts, which are intended to help end the disputes with Brussels, unblock the billions for the NRRP and truly reform the courts and the prosecution service. We have the details.

Read More

The European Commission is taking Poland to the CJEU for the Constitutional Tribunal. Our explainer

The European Commission is accusing Poland that the Constitutional Tribunal is breaching the legal order of the European Union and the rights of EU citizens with its rulings. The Commission is also contesting the choice of the ‘stand-ins’ and Julia Przyłębska as President of the Constitutional Tribunal. That is why it is referring the case to the EU Court of Justice. What happens next? Our explainer.

Read More

PiS is changing the Act on courts for billions for the National Recovery Plan. But it could breach the Constitution and incite chaos

PiS is making concessions to the EC. It will pass the disciplining of judges over to the Supreme Administrative Court and restrict the Muzzle Act. But this is another ostentatious change, because it leaves the illegal National Council for Judiciary and the neo-judges who are the source of the problems with the rule of law. The administrative judges are protesting against the changes.

Read More

President Duda attacks the judges again: they want power. Nonsense, the judges are defending the Constitution and EU law

President Andrzej Duda attacked the organizations of judges for challenging the Polish National Recovery Plan before the CJEU. According to the President, judges want to govern. However, Duda does not understand how the separation of powers works and does not know that judges can protest and express their opinions. 

Read More

Kaczyński at a rally in Płock, suddenly asked about the ‘milestones’ in the National Recovery Plan. ‘No more of this good stuff!’

‘We have really demonstrated maximum goodwill. From the point of view of the treaties, we are under no obligation to listen to the Union on the justice system. None whatsoever,’ said Jarosław Kaczyński, when asked about the ‘milestones’ in the National Recovery Plan during a successive pre-election meeting.

Read More

Open Letter to the European Commission regarding Polish National Council of the Judiciary

Polish and international civil society organisations write to the President of the Commission and the commissioners responsible for the Rule of Law, requesting an infringement action as regards the National Council of the Judiciary

Read More

Committee to Defend Justice KOS urges President of the European Commission not to give up on implementation of CJEU judgments on judicial independence in Poland

“As a coalition of legal and human rights associations operating in the area of the protection of human rights, associating, among others, the most important associations of judges in Poland, we are writing to you about the implementation of the rulings of the EU Court of Justice by the Polish authorities in the context of the negotiations on the approval of the Polish National Recovery Plan (NRP) and the conditions for subsequent disbursements from the Reconstruction Fund.”

Read More

If Brussels buys Duda’s offer, it will turn judges into fools and condemn Poland to a drift towards dictatorship

The European Commission is to decide whether to unfreeze billions for Poland from the EU’s Reconstruction Fund. It should not ‘buy’ President Duda’s or the Law and Justice party’s (PiS’s) offer. It needs to demand the full restoration of the rule of law. Otherwise, it will condemn the courts to ultimate destruction, reward ‘sly judges’ and antagonise the judicial community.

Read More

Judge Żurek: the authorities will try to bribe and intimidate the judges. But this won’t work

‘The authorities will try to use the carrot-and-stick method: a stick for those judges who are fighting for the rule of law, and a carrot for those they try to persuade over to them,’ believes Judge Waldemar Żurek. We discuss scenarios of further changes in courts and judges’ reactions to them

Read More

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary Chamberjudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionMałgorzata ManowskaAndrzej DudaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsAdam BodnarIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemneo-judgesCJEUJarosław Kaczyńskimuzzle lawNational Recovery PlanMateusz MorawieckiCourt of Justice of the European UnionCommissioner for Human RightsdemocracyWaldemar ŻurekNational Council for JudiciaryPrzemysław RadzikelectionsJulia Przyłębskadisciplinary commissionercriminal lawpresidential electionsPiotr Schabelections 2023Kamil Zaradkiewiczmedia freedomjudiciaryHungaryprosecutionSupreme Administrative Courtpreliminary rulingsharassmentFirst President of the Supreme Courtelections 2020K 3/21Dagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaPaweł JuszczyszynPresidentBeata MorawiecNational ProsecutorŁukasz PiebiakMichał LasotaprosecutorsProsecutor GeneralRecovery FundMarek SafjanConstitutionfreedom of expressionimmunitySejmMaciej NawackiIustitiaCriminal ChamberCOVID-19European Arrest WarrantRegional Court in KrakówPrime MinisterMinistry of Justicedisciplinary liability for judgesMałgorzata GersdorfcourtsreformWojciech HermelińskiVenice CommissionEU budgetExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberMaciej FerekOSCEcommission on Russian influenceconditionality mechanismfreedom of assemblyconditionalityTHEMISJustice FundKrystian MarkiewiczcorruptionWłodzimierz WróbelJarosław DudziczStanisław PiotrowiczLaw and JusticePiSStanisław BiernatAnna DalkowskaAleksander StepkowskiNational Public ProsecutorLabour and Social Security ChamberPresident of the Republic of PolandLGBTCouncil of Europecriminal proceedingsreformsNCJKrzysztof ParchimowiczP 7/20SenateMarcin RomanowskiNational Reconstruction PlanPresident of PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandProfessional Liability Chambermedia independenceLex DudaK 7/21suspensionparliamentCivil ChamberSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramPegasusParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEAWUrsula von der LeyenTVPmediaLex Super OmniaLech Garlickielectoral codePiotr PrusinowskiabortionEwa ŁętowskaArticle 6 ECHRDidier ReyndersAmsterdam District CourtPiotr GąciarekConstitutional Tribunal PresidentdefamationAndrzej StępkaMichał WawrykiewiczChamber of Professional LiabilityChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationSLAPPNext Generation EUMay 10 2020 electionsOrdo IurisAndrzej ZollNational Electoral CommissionJarosław WyrembakPM Mateusz MorawieckiFreedom HouseJustice Defence Committee – KOSacting first president of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court PresidentArticle 72017policePiotr TulejaJerzy StępieńAndrzej RzeplińskiFerdynand RymarzStanisław RymarTeresa Dębowska-Romanowskarestoration of the rule of lawaccountabilitySławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczSupreme Audit OfficeMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiOKO.pressMarek ZubikWojciech MaczugaZiobrocourt presidentsMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaJanusz Niemcewiczintimidation of dissenterstransfervetoDariusz ZawistowskiOLAFViktor Orbanpublic mediaDariusz Kornelukinsulting religious feelingsJózef IwulskiSzymon Szynkowski vel SękAndrzej MączyńskiMarek MazurkiewiczWojciech ŁączkowskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaStefan JaworskiAdam JamrózMirosław GranatKazimierz DziałochaMaciej Miteraelectoral processtransparencyK 6/21Astradsson v IcelandrecommendationJakub IwaniecXero Flor v. PolandMariusz KamińskiKrakówstate of emergencyInternational Criminal CourtJoanna Misztal-KoneckadecommunizationJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraEdyta Barańskaright to fair trialCentral Anti-Corruption BureauLaw on the NCJsurveillanceUkraineBelarusAdam Synakiewiczsmear campaignKrystyna Pawłowiczpublic opinion pollmilestonesMarek PietruszyńskiMichał LaskowskireportMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekMariusz MuszyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeDariusz DrajewiczMarian BanaśMaciej TaborowskiPaweł FilipekRafał PuchalskiHuman Rights CommissionerKonrad WytrykowskiCCBEdemocratic backslidingjudcial independenceEU law primacyBelgiumSLAPPs11 January March in Warsawcivil societyelections integrityLGBT ideology free zoneslex NGOPiotr PszczółkowskiPiebiak gateEuropean Association of Judgeshuman rightscourt changesAdam TomczyńskiGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgescriminal codeC-791/19Jarosław GowinNetherlandsEuropean ParliamentlexTuskEwa Wrzosekabuse of state resourcesZuzanna Rudzińska-Bluszczelections fairnessBogdan ŚwięczkowskicoronavirusRussiaMarcin Warchołretirement agePATFoxFree CourtsMarek JaskulskienvironmentWiesław KozielewiczArkadiusz RadwanJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczGrzegorz FurmankiewiczinvestmentWałęsa v. PolandLech WałęsaEwa ŁąpińskaE-mail scandalOsiatyński'a ArchiveTomasz SzmydtEmilia SzmydtArkadiusz CichockiMonika FrąckowiakAssessment ActIvan MischenkoAndrzej Skowronright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawUS State DepartmentChamber of Professional ResponsibilityPaweł StyrnaKasta/AntykastaZbigniew ŁupinaThe Codification Committee of Civil LawKatarzyna Chmurastrategic investmentMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekJarosław MatrasPaulina AslanowiczKaczyńskiPutinismCourt of Appeal in Krakówsame-sex unionsRafał Wojciechowskicivil partnerships billKRSDobrochna Bach-Goleckaelection fairnessJudicial ReformsMarek AstNational Broadcasting Councilct on the Protection of the PopulatioKrystyna Morawa-Fryźlewiczlegislationcivil partnershipsGeneral Court of the EUKatarzyna KotulaIrena BochniakStanisław Zdungag lawsuitsAntykastadisinformationlex RaczkowskiAleksandra RutkowskaŁukasz BilińskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActRome Statutelex WośAct sanitising the judiciaryJakub KwiecińskiRafał LisakKarolina MiklaszewskaWatchdog PolskaPoznańDariusz BarskiKoan LenaertsAnti-SLAPP Directivejustice system reformKarol WeitzLasotaDonald TuskVěra JourováKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFMałgorzata FroncJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiSebastian MazurekdiscriminationMarcin MatczakAct on the Supreme CourtState Tribunalinsulttest of independenceNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)Dariusz Dończykelectoral commissionscodification commissionEuropean Court of HuAdam GendźwiłłdelegationsoppositionKrzysztof RączkaJoanna Scheuring-WielgusElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikJustice MinistryAction Planextraordinary commissionMarcin KrajewskiBohdan BieniekZbigniew KapińskiC‑718/21repairing the rule of lawpreliminary referenceEU lawethicsDonald Tusk governmentAnna Głowacka#RecoveryFilespilot-judgmentmedia pluralismMichał DworczykDworczyk leaksTomasz KoszewskiPiotr HofmańskiMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakHater ScandalJustyna WydrzyńskaNGOFull-Scale Election Observation MissionODIHRAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekNational Council for the JudiciaryGrzegorz PudaHelsinki Foundation for Human RightsNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeRadosław BaszukJoanna KnobelCrimes of espionagecivil lawCourt of Appeal in WarsawEU valuesGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikElżbieta KarskaJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarnekhate speechhate crimesENCJIsraelforeign agents lawWojciech SadurskiOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationlegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsSimpson judgmentAK judgmentOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieLeszek Mazurinfringment actionpopulismLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsStanisław ZabłockiCouncil of the EUequal treatmentfundamental rightsCT PresidentEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitWorld Justice Project awardjudgePechKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote billresolution of 23 January 2020Leon Kieresrepressive actAct of 20 December 2019KochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakAmnesty Internationaltrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersPKWIpsosLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykTVNjournalistslexTVNPolish mediaRzeszówborderPolish National FoundationEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficeOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258clientelismoligarchic systemprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawErnest BejdaJacek SasinSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczMirosław Wróblewskiright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMichał WośMinistry of FinancePorozumienie dla PraworządnościEducation Ministerinterim measuresC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service Actmedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruCelmerGermanyautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huSebastian KaletaC-156/21C-157/21Marek PiertuszyńskiNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOlsztyn courtEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeForum shoppingTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióGazeta WyborczaPollitykaBrussels IRome IIArticle 2Przemysła Czarnek

Newest posts