Report: Rule of Law in Poland in 2020


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


The rule of law in Poland and other member states is important not only for the citizens of these countries, but also for the future of the European project as a club of countries with high-quality democratic institutions safeguarding human rights - says Civil Development Forum (FOR)

A new report “Rule of Law in Poland 2020: A Diagnosis of the Deterioration of the Rule of Law From a Comparative Perspective” published by the Civil Development Forum (FOR) summarizes the state of the rule of law in Poland after five years of the Law and Justice (PiS) party in power and analyses the current situation from a comparative perspective of the EU countries.


The topic of the rule of law in the European Union frequently arises in public debate, usually as a result of developments in two member states: Hungary and Poland. It is therefore no surprise that the governments of these two countries have for years been fierce opponents of linking the EU budget with the rule of law. The conditionality of EU funds was one of the issues negotiated during the five-day EU summit which ended on 21 July 2020. On the one hand Charles Michel, president of the European Council, declared that “for the first time in the EU’s history, respect for the rule of law will be a decisive criterion for budget spending”. On the other hand Poland’s prime minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, announced that “there is no direct link in the agreement between the rule of law and budgetary resources.”


While some connection with European values, including the rule of law, is part of the summit’s agreement, it seems that the principle of conditionality has been watered down. Nevertheless, it is still too early to assess the strength of this new instrument, and we should wait for decisions taken by other EU institutions on the matter.


The result of the 2020 presidential elections in Poland, which were won by Andrzej Duda, the candidate of the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, is also important for the future of the rule of law. During his first term President Duda supported the majority of the policies labelled as ‘reforms to the justice system‘. Therefore, his re-election means that we should expect more of such ‘reforms‘ in the future. Another wave of changes in the structure of the common courts, which could lead to the de facto verification of all judges by politicians, has already been announced by some members of the ruling majority. This means that we will observe a further deterioration of the rule of law in Poland. The anticipated ‘reforms‘ will generate clashes domestically and at the EU level. Therefore, to see where Poland is today and what might be expected in the future, it is important to analyse the current state of the rule of law from domestic and comparative perspectives, which is the main aim of this report.


To better understand the legal context in which these ‘reforms of the justice system‘ have been taking place, we will briefly discuss the key institutions of the Polish legal system in Section 2. For those who are familiar with the legal structure in Poland, we recommend moving to Section 3, in which we explain the reasons behind the key Law and Justice policies regarding the justice system. In Section 4 we analyse the main changes in the courts and prosecution service since 2015. Finally in Section 5, we describe the deterioration in the rule of law in Poland from a comparative perspective.


The rule of law in Poland and other member states is important not only for the citizens of these countries, but also for the future of the European project as a club of countries with high-quality democratic institutions safeguarding human rights.


Download full report:Rule of Law in Poland 2020



The publication is supported by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. The Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom is not responsible for the content of this publication, or for any use that may be made of it. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) alone. These views do not necessarily reflect those of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom.


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland



September 18, 2020


Supreme Courtdisciplinary proceedingsrule of lawjudicial independenceDisciplinary ChamberEuropean CommissionjudgesNational Council of the JudiciaryPolandCourt of JusticeZbigniew ZiobroConstitutional TribunalAndrzej DudaCourt of Justice of the EUdisciplinary systemEuropean UnionMinister of Justicepresidential electionsjudiciaryIgor Tuleyaelections 2020preliminary rulingsdemocracyCJEUmuzzle lawJarosław KaczyńskiCommissioner for Human RightsBeata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme CourtprosecutorsEuropean Arrest WarrantAdam BodnarCOVID-19OSCEdisciplinary commissionerPresidentProsecutor Generalfreedom of expressionLaw and JusticeNCJelectionsacting first president of the Supreme CourtMay 10 2020 electionsEuropean Court of Human RightsWaldemar ŻurekAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof Parchimowicz2017Freedom HouseExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberVenice CommissionConstitutionprosecutioncriminal lawNational Prosecutordisciplinary liability for judgesNational Electoral CommissionMarek SafjanKamil ZaradkiewiczGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesAleksander StepkowskiOrdo IurisPresident of PolandMałgorzata ManowskaJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesSejmmedia independenceZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramTHEMISEAWNetherlandsdemocratic backslidingdecommunizationMateusz MorawieckiPrime Ministerfreedom of assemblyJulia PrzyłębskaLaw on the NCJrecommendationHuman Rights CommissionerCCBEThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropereportZiobroPM Mateusz MorawieckiEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawHungarycoronavirusPiSC-791/19Wojciech Hermelińskiresolution of 23 January 2020Stanisław PiotrowiczPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakLeon KieresAndrzej ZollPKWMałgorzata Gersdorfinfringment actionEU valuesENCJlex NGOcivil societyRussiaIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtPresident of the Republic of PolandLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechcriminal codeGrzęda v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawIustitiaKrystian MarkiewiczPrzemysła RadzikMichał LasotaSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekdefamationcourtsOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsC-487/19Article 6 ECHRArticle 10 ECHRMaciej NawackiRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieUrsula von der LeyenEwa WrzosekAK judgmentSimpson judgmentEU law primacyForum Współpracy SędziówTVPmediapublic broadcasterLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiPaweł Juszczyszynimmunitymutual trustAnna DalkowskaLMBelgiumIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamBogdan ŚwięczkowskiNational Public Prosecutorpopulismequal treatmentfundamental rightspoliceCT PresidentJustice Defence Committee – KOSEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justicepublic opinion pollSupreme Court President2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUStanisław ZabłockiArticle 7European ParliamentLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiSupreme Administrative Courtadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeconditionalityEU budgetC-619/18defamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskijudgetransferPechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakretirement ageAmnesty InternationalŁukasz PiebiakPiebiak gatehuman rightstrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakMinistry of JusticeJustice FundGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote bill