The President promoted Ziobro’s people and judges from the Kasta/Antykasta group. This is what the compromise with the EU looks like

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

The President has given high promotions to judges associated with Minister Ziobro, members of the illegal NCJ and the partner of the head of the neo-NCJ. At the same time, independent judges are experiencing further repressions. This shows how the President and the PiS authorities will implement the compromise with the EU in practice.



President Andrzej Duda appointed a further group of 26 neo-judges on Friday 13 January 2023. At more or less the same time, the Sejm, passed unconstitutional amendments to the Acts on the courts with PiS’s votes – and with the majority of the opposition abstaining – in order to unlock billions for Poland for the National Recovery Plan.

 

This shows that the current authorities want to obtain EU funds at any cost so as to win the forthcoming elections. But this simultaneously shows how the compromise with the European Commission will be implemented in practice.

 

The neo-judges who the President has now appointed constitute a further group of defectively appointed people. They received their nominations from the illegal, politicised neo-NCJ, whose status has been undermined by Poland’s Supreme Administrative Court and Supreme Court, as well as by the ECtHR and the CJEU. The neo-NCJ is the main source of the problems with the rule of law in Poland. But the PiS authorities and the President are not concerned about that and are continuing to infect the courts with defective nominations for neo-judges.

 

Who the President appointed is also a sign for the European Commission. Because on the day that Zbigniew Ziobro’s Solidarna Polska voted against the bill to unlock billions for the National Recovery Plan, President Andrzej Duda rewarded judges affiliated with Ziobro, among others, with promotions. This included supporters of a hard line in the courts. Similarly, the President strengthened the influence of Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro in the courts.

 

Importantly, the President did not even have a problem with the fact that some of those promoted were members of the Kasta/Antykasta [Eng.: Caste/Anti-Caste] group. These are Rafal Puchalski and Dariusz Drajewicz. The wife of a member of this group, namely Joanna Kołodziej-Michałowicz, a member of the neo-NCJ, was also promoted. The partner of the head of the neo-NCJ, Dagmara Pawełczyk-Woicka, namely Dariusz Pawłyszcze, was also promoted.

 

In other words, the PiS authority is winking at the EU that it wants a compromise. But the President is simultaneously handing out defective appointments to neo-judges, appointing judges to help the authorities with the ‘reforms’ of the courts – including members of the illegal NCJ, which is the main source of the problems with the rule of law in Poland – and is contributing to the further devastation of the Polish courts. This should be a clear sign for the EC as to what the PiS government intends to do and that its concessions are sham and tactical.

 

And repressions for independent judges

The fact that Ziobro’s people have been repressing independent judges in recent weeks also suggests that the current compromise between PiS and the EC is just a tactical ploy before the elections. Another absurd disciplinary case was brought against Judge Maciej Ferek of the Regional Court in Kraków, who is one of the judges still suspended by the illegal Disciplinary Chamber.

 

The other judge who is still suspended, Piotr Gąciarek from the Regional Court in Warsaw, is also being prosecuted. For his critical posts in Twitter about Ziobro’s and his people’s ‘reforms’; a director from the Ministry of Justice reported him to the disciplinary commissioner.

 

Meanwhile, in the last days of 2022, Judge Dorota Lutostańska of the Regional Court in Olsztyn was forcibly transferred to another division. She was transferred from the criminal appellate division (which reviews the judgments of the district courts) to the criminal division, which tries cases in the first instance.

 

Lutostańska had previously been prosecuted for wearing a T-shirt with the word Konstytucja (Eng.: Constitution] on it. The judges from Olsztyn understood that her transfer was a repression, because she had been adjudicating for 14 years in the appellate division.

 

The decision to transfer her was made by the vice-president of the Regional Court in Olsztyn, Marcin Czapski, Minister Ziobro’s nominee. He is a former prosecutor and a neo-judge. And recently, Michał Lasota, who, as one of Minister Ziobro’s three disciplinary commissioners, prosecutes independent judges, was made president of that court. It was he who pressed disciplinary charges against Lutostańska for the T-shirt with the word Konstytucja on it.

President promotes members of the Kasta/Antykasta group

The President gave nominations to the higher courts on Friday 13 January 2023, among others, to:

 

Rafał Puchalski became a judge of the Court of Appeal in Rzeszów. He had been a district judge from Jarosław until now. His career started to bloom at the time of the PiS government. He worked on secondment at the Ministry of Justice and then became president of the Regional Court in Rzeszów. PiS also chose him in the Sejm to be a member of the neo-NCJ for the first and second terms of office. He is currently the deputy head of this illegal body.

 

Puchalski had previously received a nomination from the neo-NCJ to the illegal Disciplinary Chamber, but the President did not appoint him. Therefore, the neo-NCJ gave him a nomination to the Court of Appeal in Rzeszów. It is speculated that he has a good chance of becoming president of that court as well, as there has been a vacancy there since October 2022.

 

Puchalski appears in the context of the hate scandal. Onet wrote that he helped edit Emilia Szmydt’s libel regarding Krystian Markiewicz, the head of Iustitia. He was also a member of the Kasta/Antykasta discussion group on WhatsApp, which mainly brought together judges close to former Deputy Minister of Justice Łukasz Piebiak.

 

Puchalski, as president of the regional court, fell into conflict with judges from the criminal division, who sued him for unequal treatment. And he initiated disciplinary action against them for applying an interpretation of the law that was favourable for the citizens.

 

Puchalski also adjudicated on secondment in the Court of Appeal in Rzeszów, but the Supreme Court overturned the judgments passed with his involvement. Because the secondment given to him by the Ministry of Justice was defective.

 

– Dariusz Drajewicz became a judge of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw. He, like Puchalski, jumped into the position of judge of the court of appeal from the lowest district court level. Because, until now, he had been a rank and file judge of the District Court for Warsaw-Mokotów. So he skipped the regional court level.

 

Drajewicz is also a member of the neo-NCJ of the first and second terms. He is considered to be in the hawk faction. And, like Puchalski, he belonged to the Kasta/Antykasta discussion group. He had also received a nomination to the illegal Disciplinary Chamber, but the President did not appoint him. Therefore, the neo-NCJ gave him a nomination to the Court of Appeal. Drajewicz received the nomination even though the legal NCJ had previously denied him promotion as many as 20 times.

 

Drajewicz was known for holding several positions at once. He was also the vice-president of the Regional Court in Warsaw, but, as TVN24 revealed, he was not overworked in that position. He adjudicated on secondment in the Court of Appeal.

 

His partner, Joanna Oliwa, also received a nomination from the neo-NCJ – she became a judge of the Regional Court in Warsaw.

 

Promotions for the partner of the head of the NCJ and for a judge known for her family promotions

Others recently appointed to higher courts by the President include:

– Dariusz Pawłyszcze. He ended up in the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court. Until now, he was a judge of the Regional Court in Kraków. Privately, he is the partner of Dagmara Pawełczyk-Woicka, former president of the Regional Court in Kraków nominated by Minister Ziobro and currently head of the illegal neo-NCJ. In her school days, Pawełczyk-Woicka was Zbigniew Ziobro’s classmate. Since the first term of office of the neo-NCJ, of which she was a member, she was promoted to the office of judge of the regional court in Kraków. In recent years, Pawłyszcze was the director of the National School of the Judiciary and Public Prosecution, which is subordinated to Minister Ziobro.

 

Joanna Kołodziej-Michałowicz became a judge of the Regional Court in Słupsk. She had been waiting for several years for an appointment from the President. She is a member of the neo-NCJ of the first and second terms of office, and is currently in the presidium of this illegal body.

 

Kołodziej-Michałowicz is known for her family promotions. She herself received a nomination from the neo-NCJ, of which she is a member. But the neo-NCJ also nominated her husband Andrzej Michałowicz, president of the Regional Court in Słupsk. He was promoted to the office of regional court judge. Michałowicz was also a member of the Kasta/Antikasta group.

 

Kolodziej-Michalowicz’s sister, Ewa Kolodziej-Dubowska, also received a nomination from the neo-NCJ. She was nominated to the office of judge of the Regional Court in Białystok.

 

Waldemar Krok became a judge of the Court of Appeal in Rzeszów. It is unofficially said that he is well acquainted with Puchalski. Until now, Judge Krok was the president of the District Court in Dębica and a judge of that court. He signed lists of support for neo-NCJ candidates, which gave him a promotion.

 

Jacek Saramaga became a judge of the Court of Appeal in Wrocław. He is also president of that court.

 

Anna Olszewska became a judge of the Court of Appeal in Kraków. This is a surprising and amazing promotion. Olszewska is a legal counsel serving companies. Since 2009, she was a legal counsel at the Detention Centre in Kraków. The inspector from the court of appeal negatively assessed her candidacy. He concluded that she did not have the appropriate background to adjudicate as a judge of the court of appeal. Even so, the neo-NCJ gave her the nomination.

 

Translated by Roman Wojtasz

 

The article was published in Polish in OKO.press on 13 January 2023.



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

January 17, 2023

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary Chamberjudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsAdam BodnarIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemneo-judgesmuzzle lawCJEUJarosław KaczyńskiNational Recovery PlanMateusz MorawieckiCommissioner for Human RightsWaldemar ŻurekCourt of Justice of the European UnionNational Council for JudiciaryPrzemysław RadzikdemocracyPiotr Schabjudiciarypresidential electionselectionscriminal lawKamil Zaradkiewiczelections 2023disciplinary commissionermedia freedomJulia PrzyłębskaK 3/21First President of the Supreme Courtelections 2020harassmentSupreme Administrative Courtpreliminary rulingsDagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaprosecutionHungaryMichał LasotaprosecutorsBeata MorawiecRecovery FundPresidentProsecutor GeneralPaweł JuszczyszynNational ProsecutorŁukasz PiebiakConstitutionEuropean Arrest WarrantPrime Ministerfreedom of expressionMaciej NawackiCOVID-19Marek SafjanVenice CommissionSejmimmunityCriminal ChamberRegional Court in KrakówIustitiaMaciej FerekMałgorzata GersdorfreformMinistry of JusticeNCJExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberOSCEcourtsWojciech Hermelińskidisciplinary liability for judgesEU budgetcorruptionStanisław PiotrowiczNational Public Prosecutorcriminal proceedingsCouncil of EuropeAnna DalkowskaLGBTJustice FundPresident of the Republic of PolandWłodzimierz Wróbelconditionality mechanismTHEMISKrystian MarkiewiczAleksander StepkowskiStanisław BiernatPiSreformsLaw and Justicecommission on Russian influenceLabour and Social Security ChamberJarosław Dudziczconditionalityfreedom of assemblyPresident of PolandChamber of Professional LiabilityOrdo Iurismedia independenceDidier ReyndersReczkowicz and Others v. PolandSLAPPStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationBroda and Bojara v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsSupreme Court PresidentMarcin Romanowskielectoral codeAndrzej StępkaArticle 7Piotr PrusinowskiSenateSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeTVPmediaLech GarlickiLex Super OmniapoliceabortionNext Generation EUUrsula von der LeyenEAWJustice Defence Committee – KOSAmsterdam District CourtdefamationKrzysztof ParchimowiczFreedom HouseMichał WawrykiewiczEwa ŁętowskaArticle 6 ECHRMay 10 2020 elections2017Piotr GąciarekPegasussuspensionP 7/20acting first president of the Supreme CourtNational Electoral CommissionK 7/21PM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej ZollJarosław WyrembakLex DudaProfessional Liability ChamberCivil Chamberparliamentcivil societyNational Reconstruction PlanConstitutional Tribunal PresidentAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraKrakówBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaStanisław RymarMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaJanusz NiemcewiczAndrzej MączyńskiMarek MazurkiewiczAdam Synakiewiczstate of emergencyWojciech ŁączkowskiEdyta BarańskaMirosław GranatKazimierz DziałochaJoanna Misztal-Koneckajudcial independenceMaciej MiteraDariusz KornelukViktor OrbanOLAFrestoration of the rule of lawvetoMariusz KamińskisurveillanceK 6/21Józef IwulskiAstradsson v IcelandCentral Anti-Corruption BureauPATFoxSLAPPsTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaaccountabilityUkraineKrystyna PawłowiczRafał PuchalskitransparencyDariusz ZawistowskiOKO.pressright to fair trialDariusz DrajewiczPaweł FilipekMaciej Taborowskismear campaigninsulting religious feelingsNational Prosecutor’s OfficeMariusz MuszyńskiBelaruselectoral processcourt presidentsMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekmilestonesWojciech MaczugaMichał LaskowskiMarian BanaśJakub IwaniecSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczPiotr TulejaJerzy Stępieńelections fairnessAndrzej RzeplińskiSzymon Szynkowski vel SękFerdynand RymarzInternational Criminal CourtMarek PietruszyńskiMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiXero Flor v. Polandpublic mediaSupreme Audit OfficelexTuskcourt changeselections integrityMarek ZubikKonrad Wytrykowskiabuse of state resourcesGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesEuropean ParliamentZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczMarcin Warchoł11 January March in WarsawEuropean Association of JudgesZiobroFree CourtsdecommunizationEwa WrzosekEU law primacyhuman rightsPiebiak gaterecommendationreportLaw on the NCJlex NGORussiaCCBEpublic opinion pollHuman Rights CommissionerJarosław GowinPiotr PszczółkowskiLGBT ideology free zonesC-791/19coronaviruscriminal coderetirement ageNetherlandsAdam Tomczyńskidemocratic backslidingintimidation of dissentersThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeBogdan ŚwięczkowskitransferBelgiumJoanna Scheuring-WielgusNations in TransitCouncil of the EUElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikKatarzyna ChmuraSebastian MazurekJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiLIBE Committeedefamatory statementsMałgorzata FroncRafał LisakKarolina MiklaszewskaNGOKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczIrena BochniakoppositionEuropean Court of Huelectoral commissionsAct on the Supreme CourtdiscriminationJakub KwiecińskiWorld Justice Project awardTomasz Koszewskitest of independenceDariusz DończykGrzegorz FurmankiewiczAntykastaStanisław ZdunAdam Gendźwiłł2018Wojciech SadurskiFull-Scale Election Observation MissionODIHRMarek Jaskulskirepairing the rule of lawadvocate generalpress release#RecoveryFilesmedia pluralismMichał DworczykDworczyk leaksE-mail scandalAndrzej SkowronRights and Values ProgrammeTomasz SzmydtŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoMonika FrąckowiakEmilia SzmydtSwieczkowskiKasta/AntykastaBohdan BieniekStanisław ZabłockiJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekGrzegorz PudaNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeWiesław KozielewiczFrans TimmermansMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakUS Department of StateMarcin KrajewskiEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaPaweł StyrnaC-619/18Arkadiusz CichockiCT PresidentMarcin Matczakequal treatmentNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)codification commissiondelegationsWatchdog PolskaDariusz BarskiLasotafundamental rightsState Tribunalinsultcivil lawRadosław BaszukAction PlanJustice MinistryVěra JourováDonald Tuskjustice system reformAnti-SLAPP DirectiveHater ScandalpopulismNational Council for the Judiciarycivil partnerships billKRSJudicial Reformsmigration strategyPenal CodeLGBTQ+NIKProfetosame-sex unionsKatarzyna Kotulacivil partnershipsHelsinki Foundation for Human RightsPiotr HofmańskiC‑718/21preliminary referenceEU lawethicsChamber of Professional ResponsibilityThe Codification Committee of Civil LawInvestigationPoznańKrzysztof Rączkaextraordinary commissionZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaCourt of Appeal in WarsawOsiatyński'a Archivetransitional justiceUS State DepartmentAssessment ActCrimes of espionageJoanna KnobelAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszKoan LenaertsKarol WeitzKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFJustyna Wydrzyńskaenvironmentinvestmentstrategic investmentRafał WojciechowskiAleksandra RutkowskaGeneral Court of the EUArkadiusz RadwanLech WałęsaWałęsa v. Polandright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawpilot-judgmentDobrochna Bach-Goleckaelection fairnessNational Broadcasting Councilgag lawsuitslex RaczkowskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActdisinformationlustrationWhite PaperEUDonald Tusk governmentjudgePrzemysław CzarnekJózsef SzájerRafał TrzaskowskiKlubrádióSobczyńska and Others v PolandŻurek v PolandGazeta WyborczaGrzęda v PolandPollitykaJelenmedia lawIndex.huJacek CzaputowiczElżbieta KarskaPrzemysła Radzikmedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMABrussels IRome IILGBT free zonesFirst President of the Suprme CourtBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeOlsztyn courtPrzemysła CzarnekequalityMarek PiertuszyńskiChamber of Extraordinary VerificationArticle 2Forum shoppinghate speechEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian Kaletahate crimesC-156/21C-157/21Education Ministerthe Regional Court in Warsawproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońGermanyCelmermutual trustabortion rulingLMUnited NationsLeszek MazurAmsterdamIrena Majcherinterim measuresIrelandautocratizationMultiannual Financial FrameworkC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUC-487/19Norwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsNorwegian fundsNorwayKraśnikOmbudsmanZbigniew BoniekENAArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service Actpublic broadcasterForum Współpracy SędziówSimpson judgmentAK judgmentlegislative practiceforeign agents lawrepressive actMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitLSOtrans-Atlantic valuesDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandAmnesty InternationalThe First President of the Supreme CourtErnest BejdaJacek Sasinright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychAct of 20 December 2019Michał WośMinistry of FinancelawyersFrackowiakPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikKochenovPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasMałgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderekct on the Protection of the PopulatioPechlegislationlex WośKaczyńskiPutinismCourt of Appeal in KrakówMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAct sanitising the judiciaryECJMarek AstFreedom in the WorldEvgeni TanchevRome StatuteIsraelEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficeEU valuesPolish National FoundationLux Veritatisinfringment actionMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykPKWENCJoligarchic systemclientelismIpsosOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258Leon Kieresresolution of 23 January 2020Telex.huEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtAlina CzubieniakMaciej RutkiewiczharrassmentMirosław WróblewskiprimacyborderGerard BirgfellerTVNjournalistslexTVNpostal vote billPolish mediapostal voteEwa MaciejewskaRzeszówKoen Lenaerts