Polish judge persecuted for implementing Court of Justice verdict

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

Judge Paweł Juszczyszyn, an advocate of judicial independence, is being targeted by appointees of Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro for implementing a CJEU ruling that the PiS-led government disagrees with. Judges and ordinary citizens around Poland have come out to protest in his defence.



No sooner had Paweł Juszczyszyn, a Polish judge from the city of Olsztyn, implemented a recent CJEU verdict than government-friendly Polish media began publishing information about his private life, past verdicts, and even a speeding ticket. All this to portray the judge as a member of a demoralised “caste” that Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro and the PiS-led government are fighting to bring down. The truth of the accusations is, to say the least, up for debate.

 

“The two faces of Judge Juszczyszyn”, “Judge Juszczyszyn’s verdict ruined a farmer. Family speaks of drama and death”. These are just some of the headlines of articles “exposing” the judge, who was the first justice in Poland to implement the ruling by the CJEU addressing the legality of the Supreme Court’s Disciplinary Chamber and the new National Council of the Judiciary.

 

Judge Paweł Juszczyszyn demanded that the Chancellery of the Sejm hand over the list of signatures of those giving their support to candidates to the new Council, including those backing Maciej Nawacki, president of the Regional Court in Olsztyn and member of the new Council.

 

A wave of repression was unleashed against Juszczyszyn for his actions. Minister Zbigniew Ziobro recalled him from his delegation to the District Court; the disciplinary officer, installed by Ziobro, launched disciplinary proceedings against him, and the president of the court Maciej Nawacki (himself a member of the new Council, also appointed by Ziobro) suspended him from the bench. However, Juszczyszyn has received strong support from judges and ordinary people from all over Poland, who took to the streets to demonstrate their backing.

 

Right-wing media outlets immediately began publishing articles “exposing” Juszczyszyn, and their stories were picked up by the government-run TVP Info website. Those stories were then repeated by politicians from PiS. On Thursday, 5 December, the main TVP news bulletin “Wiadomości” broadcast material presenting Juszczyszyn as a hero of the political opposition.

 

So far, four matters from the defiant judge’s past have been brought to light as part of a move to cast a shadow on his attitude as a judge, and to destroy his image as a defender of the independence of the judiciary.

 

He is accused of being greedy, and that he is suing his ex-wife for the “500 plus” child benefit. The claims also say he is a reckless driver, that he has falsified documents, and that he erred in a ruling that destroyed a farmer’s livelihood. This is the tip of the repression iceberg.

 

The entire judicial community is deeply concerned by the campaign of repression being waged against Juszczyszyn for implementing the CJEU verdict. As a gesture of solidarity with the persecuted justice, two deputies of the president of the Olsztyn Regional Court resigned from their posts. They are demanding the dismissal of the court’s president Nawacki, who was responsible for suspending Juszczyszyn from the bench.

 

[translated by Matthew La Fontaine]



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

December 11, 2019

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary Chamberjudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionMałgorzata ManowskaAndrzej DudaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsAdam BodnarIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemneo-judgesCJEUJarosław Kaczyńskimuzzle lawNational Recovery PlanMateusz MorawieckiCourt of Justice of the European UnionCommissioner for Human RightsdemocracyWaldemar ŻurekNational Council for JudiciaryPrzemysław RadzikelectionsJulia Przyłębskadisciplinary commissionercriminal lawpresidential electionsPiotr Schabelections 2023Kamil Zaradkiewiczmedia freedomjudiciaryHungaryprosecutionSupreme Administrative Courtpreliminary rulingsharassmentFirst President of the Supreme Courtelections 2020K 3/21Dagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaPaweł JuszczyszynPresidentBeata MorawiecNational ProsecutorŁukasz PiebiakMichał LasotaprosecutorsProsecutor GeneralRecovery FundMarek SafjanConstitutionfreedom of expressionimmunitySejmMaciej NawackiIustitiaCriminal ChamberCOVID-19European Arrest WarrantRegional Court in KrakówPrime MinisterMinistry of Justicedisciplinary liability for judgesMałgorzata GersdorfcourtsreformWojciech HermelińskiVenice CommissionEU budgetExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberMaciej FerekOSCEcommission on Russian influenceconditionality mechanismfreedom of assemblyconditionalityTHEMISJustice FundKrystian MarkiewiczcorruptionWłodzimierz WróbelJarosław DudziczStanisław PiotrowiczLaw and JusticePiSStanisław BiernatAnna DalkowskaAleksander StepkowskiNational Public ProsecutorLabour and Social Security ChamberPresident of the Republic of PolandLGBTCouncil of Europecriminal proceedingsreformsNCJKrzysztof ParchimowiczP 7/20SenateMarcin RomanowskiNational Reconstruction PlanPresident of PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandProfessional Liability Chambermedia independenceLex DudaK 7/21suspensionparliamentCivil ChamberSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramPegasusParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEAWUrsula von der LeyenTVPmediaLex Super OmniaLech Garlickielectoral codePiotr PrusinowskiabortionEwa ŁętowskaArticle 6 ECHRDidier ReyndersAmsterdam District CourtPiotr GąciarekConstitutional Tribunal PresidentdefamationAndrzej StępkaMichał WawrykiewiczChamber of Professional LiabilityChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationSLAPPNext Generation EUMay 10 2020 electionsOrdo IurisAndrzej ZollNational Electoral CommissionJarosław WyrembakPM Mateusz MorawieckiFreedom HouseJustice Defence Committee – KOSacting first president of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court PresidentArticle 72017policePiotr TulejaJerzy StępieńAndrzej RzeplińskiFerdynand RymarzStanisław RymarTeresa Dębowska-Romanowskarestoration of the rule of lawaccountabilitySławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczSupreme Audit OfficeMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiOKO.pressMarek ZubikWojciech MaczugaZiobrocourt presidentsMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaJanusz Niemcewiczintimidation of dissenterstransfervetoDariusz ZawistowskiOLAFViktor Orbanpublic mediaDariusz Kornelukinsulting religious feelingsJózef IwulskiSzymon Szynkowski vel SękAndrzej MączyńskiMarek MazurkiewiczWojciech ŁączkowskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaStefan JaworskiAdam JamrózMirosław GranatKazimierz DziałochaMaciej Miteraelectoral processtransparencyK 6/21Astradsson v IcelandrecommendationJakub IwaniecXero Flor v. PolandMariusz KamińskiKrakówstate of emergencyInternational Criminal CourtJoanna Misztal-KoneckadecommunizationJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraEdyta Barańskaright to fair trialCentral Anti-Corruption BureauLaw on the NCJsurveillanceUkraineBelarusAdam Synakiewiczsmear campaignKrystyna Pawłowiczpublic opinion pollmilestonesMarek PietruszyńskiMichał LaskowskireportMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekMariusz MuszyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeDariusz DrajewiczMarian BanaśMaciej TaborowskiPaweł FilipekRafał PuchalskiHuman Rights CommissionerKonrad WytrykowskiCCBEdemocratic backslidingjudcial independenceEU law primacyBelgiumSLAPPs11 January March in Warsawcivil societyelections integrityLGBT ideology free zoneslex NGOPiotr PszczółkowskiPiebiak gateEuropean Association of Judgeshuman rightscourt changesAdam TomczyńskiGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgescriminal codeC-791/19Jarosław GowinNetherlandsEuropean ParliamentlexTuskEwa Wrzosekabuse of state resourcesZuzanna Rudzińska-Bluszczelections fairnessBogdan ŚwięczkowskicoronavirusRussiaMarcin Warchołretirement agePATFoxFree CourtsMarek JaskulskienvironmentWiesław KozielewiczArkadiusz RadwanJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczGrzegorz FurmankiewiczinvestmentWałęsa v. PolandLech WałęsaEwa ŁąpińskaE-mail scandalOsiatyński'a ArchiveTomasz SzmydtEmilia SzmydtArkadiusz CichockiMonika FrąckowiakAssessment ActIvan MischenkoAndrzej Skowronright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawUS State DepartmentChamber of Professional ResponsibilityPaweł StyrnaKasta/AntykastaZbigniew ŁupinaThe Codification Committee of Civil LawKatarzyna Chmurastrategic investmentMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekJarosław MatrasPaulina AslanowiczKaczyńskiPutinismCourt of Appeal in Krakówsame-sex unionsRafał Wojciechowskicivil partnerships billKRSDobrochna Bach-Goleckaelection fairnessJudicial ReformsMarek AstNational Broadcasting Councilct on the Protection of the PopulatioKrystyna Morawa-Fryźlewiczlegislationcivil partnershipsGeneral Court of the EUKatarzyna KotulaIrena BochniakStanisław Zdungag lawsuitsAntykastadisinformationlex RaczkowskiAleksandra RutkowskaŁukasz BilińskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActRome Statutelex WośAct sanitising the judiciaryJakub KwiecińskiRafał LisakKarolina MiklaszewskaWatchdog PolskaPoznańDariusz BarskiKoan LenaertsAnti-SLAPP Directivejustice system reformKarol WeitzLasotaDonald TuskVěra JourováKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFMałgorzata FroncJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiSebastian MazurekdiscriminationMarcin MatczakAct on the Supreme CourtState Tribunalinsulttest of independenceNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)Dariusz Dończykelectoral commissionscodification commissionEuropean Court of HuAdam GendźwiłłdelegationsoppositionKrzysztof RączkaJoanna Scheuring-WielgusElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikJustice MinistryAction Planextraordinary commissionMarcin KrajewskiBohdan BieniekZbigniew KapińskiC‑718/21repairing the rule of lawpreliminary referenceEU lawethicsDonald Tusk governmentAnna Głowacka#RecoveryFilespilot-judgmentmedia pluralismMichał DworczykDworczyk leaksTomasz KoszewskiPiotr HofmańskiMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakHater ScandalJustyna WydrzyńskaNGOFull-Scale Election Observation MissionODIHRAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekNational Council for the JudiciaryGrzegorz PudaHelsinki Foundation for Human RightsNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeRadosław BaszukJoanna KnobelCrimes of espionagecivil lawCourt of Appeal in WarsawEU valuesGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikElżbieta KarskaJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarnekhate speechhate crimesENCJIsraelforeign agents lawWojciech SadurskiOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationlegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsSimpson judgmentAK judgmentOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieLeszek Mazurinfringment actionpopulismLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsStanisław ZabłockiCouncil of the EUequal treatmentfundamental rightsCT PresidentEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitWorld Justice Project awardjudgePechKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote billresolution of 23 January 2020Leon Kieresrepressive actAct of 20 December 2019KochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakAmnesty Internationaltrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersPKWIpsosLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykTVNjournalistslexTVNPolish mediaRzeszówborderPolish National FoundationEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficeOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258clientelismoligarchic systemprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawErnest BejdaJacek SasinSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczMirosław Wróblewskiright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMichał WośMinistry of FinancePorozumienie dla PraworządnościEducation Ministerinterim measuresC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service Actmedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruCelmerGermanyautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huSebastian KaletaC-156/21C-157/21Marek PiertuszyńskiNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOlsztyn courtEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeForum shoppingTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióGazeta WyborczaPollitykaBrussels IRome IIArticle 2Przemysła Czarnek