Minister Bodnar has appointed a codification commission tasked with reforming the courts and the prosecutor’s office

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

The appointed codification commission of the system of common courts and the prosecutor's office, led by the president of Iustitia, Prof. Krystian Markiewicz, is to propose a true reform of the courts. This commission will also decide what to do next with the neo-judges.



On Friday, April 12, 2024, Prime Minister Donald Tusk appointed members of the commission at the request of Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar. This is already the second codification commission established under the Ministry of Justice. At the beginning of April 2024, the Prime Minister appointed members of the codification commission for criminal law, which is tasked with reviewing this law and cleaning up the criminal codes after the times of Ziobro. Leading this commission is a legitimate judge of the Supreme Court from the Criminal Chamber, Prof. Włodzimierz Wróbel from Jagiellonian University.

 

The chairman of the codification commission for civil law is also known. It will be headed by the former president of the Constitutional Tribunal and judge of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Prof. Marek Safjan. Its members have not yet been appointed. There will also be a fourth commission for family law.

 

The codification commissions for criminal and civil law operated during the PO-PSL government, but they were dissolved by Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro. Minister Bodnar is reactivating them and appointing two new ones – for family law and the system of common courts and the prosecutor’s office.

 

All commissions are meant to help Bodnar reform the law – to clean it from the bad changes introduced during the PiS government, but also to adapt it to the present times. The commissions consist of recognized legal experts and authorities. The proposals developed by them will be presented for further consultations and legislative work.

 

On Friday, April 12, 2024, Minister Bodnar, while presenting the letters of appointment to the codification commission for the system of common courts and the prosecutor’s office, said: “Its establishment is of particular importance because such an institution did not exist before. Thanks to your work, it will be possible to introduce reforms and return to the rule of law in the field of Courts and the Prosecutor’s Office. The mission of the commission is to support reforms and repair reality so that the legislative solutions developed will function and lay the groundwork for further changes that will improve the operation of Courts and the Prosecutor’s Office for the years to come.”

 

And the chairman of this commission, Prof. Krystian Markiewicz from the University of Silesia – in the photo at the top – added: “We are facing a huge challenge. Courts and the Prosecutor’s Office must operate efficiently and fairly. This is our task, which we must fulfill.”

 

The task of this commission will be to develop draft legislative acts. It will also be responsible for providing opinions on draft legal acts sent to them for assessment by the Minister of Justice.

 

Minister Bodnar did not choose Prof. Krystian Markiewicz without reason. The largest association of Polish judges led by him, Iustitia, was a serious defender of the rule of law. It was thanks in part to Iustitia that Minister Ziobro, despite reprisals, did not break the judges.

 

This commission will indeed determine how the courts will ultimately be structured and how they will operate. It will decide on the new Supreme Court (SN), the new National Council of the Judiciary (KRS), and whether the Minister of Justice will continue to have administrative oversight over the courts. Judges are against this oversight because the times of Ziobro showed that it leads to control over the courts and judges.

 

This commission will also decide whether neo-judges will lose their appointments from the neo-KRS or whether they will be subject to verification. Finally, this commission will develop the independence of the prosecutor’s office from politics and the ultimate reform of the prosecutor’s office. That’s why there are also members of the association of independent prosecutors from Lex Super Omnia in the commission, who defended the independence of the prosecutor’s office.

 

The codification commission for the system of common courts and the prosecutor’s office faces a significant challenge. It not only has to clean up the justice system after years of Ziobro’s rule but also has to push the courts forward to make them more efficient, modern, and citizen-oriented. Members of Iustitia spoke about such courts a few days ago at their XXX congress. Prof. Krystian Markiewicz also speaks of such courts, emphasizing that there is no going back to the courts before 2015.

 

Here is the composition of the codification commission for the system of common courts and the prosecutor’s office, led by Prof. Krystian Markiewicz:

 

1. Bohdan Bieniek: Legitimate judge of the Supreme Court from the Chamber of Labor and Social Insurance. He was involved in defending the rule of law and chaired the adjudicating panel that confirmed the expiration of the parliamentary mandate of Mariusz Kamiński from PiS.

2. Dr. Maciej Czajka: Judge of the District Court in Krakow. He engaged in defending independent courts, for which he faced reprisals.

3. Dr. hab. Katarzyna Gajda-Roszczynialska: Judge of the District Court for Krakow Krowodrza.

4. Dr. Michał Węglowski: Prosecutor of the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Gdańsk. He is a co-author of a competing draft law on the new prosecutor’s office, separate from Lex Super Omnia.

5. Dr. hab. Karolina Kremens: Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Law, Administration, and Economics at the University of Wrocław. She is the vice-chair of the commission.

6. Dr. Jarosław Matras: Legitimate judge of the Supreme Court from the Criminal Chamber. In recent years, he has defended the independence of the Supreme Court and advocated for the rights of persecuted judges.

7. Dr. Michał Mistygacz: Prosecutor of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw. He is an assistant professor at the Department of Political Systems at the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies at the University of Warsaw and a member of Lex Super Omnia.

8. Jarosław Onyszczuk: Prosecutor of the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw. He is a member of Lex Super Omnia and has been actively involved in defending the independence of the prosecutor’s office. He advocates for persecuted prosecutors.

9. Dr. Małgorzata Szeroczyńska: Member of the National Council of Prosecutors, prosecutor of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Żyrardów. She is affiliated with Lex Super Omnia.

10. Dr. hab. Maciej Taborowski: Professor at the Institute of Legal Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences. He worked with Bodnar when he was the Ombudsman. He has been involved in defending the rule of law and specializes in European law.

11. Prof. dr hab. Piotr Tuleja: Head of the Department of Constitutional Law at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Warsaw. He is a retired judge of the Constitutional Tribunal.

12. Dr. hab. Marcin Walasik: Professor at the Department of Civil Procedure at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. He is a judge of the District Court Poznań-Grunwald and Jeżyce in Poznań.

13. Dr. Bartosz Wołodkiewicz: Assistant Professor at the Department of Civil Procedure at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Warsaw.

14. Aleksandra Wrzesińska-Nowacka: Judge of the Supreme Administrative Court, adjudicating in the Financial Chamber.

15. Dr. Tomasz Zalasiński: Legal advisor, member of the State Tribunal from 2019 to 2023.

The secretary of the Commission is Dr. Urszula Żółtak, a judge from the capital city, associated with Iustitia.

 

The article was published in Polish in OKO.press on 12 April 2024.



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

April 20, 2024

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary Chamberjudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsAdam BodnarIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemneo-judgesmuzzle lawCJEUJarosław KaczyńskiNational Recovery PlanMateusz MorawieckiCommissioner for Human RightsWaldemar ŻurekCourt of Justice of the European UnionNational Council for JudiciaryPrzemysław RadzikdemocracyPiotr Schabjudiciarypresidential electionselectionscriminal lawKamil Zaradkiewiczelections 2023disciplinary commissionermedia freedomJulia PrzyłębskaK 3/21First President of the Supreme Courtelections 2020harassmentSupreme Administrative Courtpreliminary rulingsDagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaprosecutionHungaryMichał LasotaprosecutorsBeata MorawiecRecovery FundPresidentProsecutor GeneralPaweł JuszczyszynNational ProsecutorŁukasz PiebiakConstitutionEuropean Arrest WarrantPrime Ministerfreedom of expressionMaciej NawackiCOVID-19Marek SafjanVenice CommissionSejmimmunityCriminal ChamberRegional Court in KrakówIustitiaMaciej FerekMałgorzata GersdorfreformMinistry of JusticeNCJExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberOSCEcourtsWojciech Hermelińskidisciplinary liability for judgesEU budgetcorruptionStanisław PiotrowiczNational Public Prosecutorcriminal proceedingsCouncil of EuropeAnna DalkowskaLGBTJustice FundPresident of the Republic of PolandWłodzimierz Wróbelconditionality mechanismTHEMISKrystian MarkiewiczAleksander StepkowskiStanisław BiernatPiSreformsLaw and Justicecommission on Russian influenceLabour and Social Security ChamberJarosław Dudziczconditionalityfreedom of assemblyPresident of PolandChamber of Professional LiabilityOrdo Iurismedia independenceDidier ReyndersReczkowicz and Others v. PolandSLAPPStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationBroda and Bojara v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsSupreme Court PresidentMarcin Romanowskielectoral codeAndrzej StępkaArticle 7Piotr PrusinowskiSenateSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeTVPmediaLech GarlickiLex Super OmniapoliceabortionNext Generation EUUrsula von der LeyenEAWJustice Defence Committee – KOSAmsterdam District CourtdefamationKrzysztof ParchimowiczFreedom HouseMichał WawrykiewiczEwa ŁętowskaArticle 6 ECHRMay 10 2020 elections2017Piotr GąciarekPegasussuspensionP 7/20acting first president of the Supreme CourtNational Electoral CommissionK 7/21PM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej ZollJarosław WyrembakLex DudaProfessional Liability ChamberCivil Chamberparliamentcivil societyNational Reconstruction PlanConstitutional Tribunal PresidentAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraKrakówBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaStanisław RymarMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaJanusz NiemcewiczAndrzej MączyńskiMarek MazurkiewiczAdam Synakiewiczstate of emergencyWojciech ŁączkowskiEdyta BarańskaMirosław GranatKazimierz DziałochaJoanna Misztal-Koneckajudcial independenceMaciej MiteraDariusz KornelukViktor OrbanOLAFrestoration of the rule of lawvetoMariusz KamińskisurveillanceK 6/21Józef IwulskiAstradsson v IcelandCentral Anti-Corruption BureauPATFoxSLAPPsTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaaccountabilityUkraineKrystyna PawłowiczRafał PuchalskitransparencyDariusz ZawistowskiOKO.pressright to fair trialDariusz DrajewiczPaweł FilipekMaciej Taborowskismear campaigninsulting religious feelingsNational Prosecutor’s OfficeMariusz MuszyńskiBelaruselectoral processcourt presidentsMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekmilestonesWojciech MaczugaMichał LaskowskiMarian BanaśJakub IwaniecSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczPiotr TulejaJerzy Stępieńelections fairnessAndrzej RzeplińskiSzymon Szynkowski vel SękFerdynand RymarzInternational Criminal CourtMarek PietruszyńskiMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiXero Flor v. Polandpublic mediaSupreme Audit OfficelexTuskcourt changeselections integrityMarek ZubikKonrad Wytrykowskiabuse of state resourcesGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesEuropean ParliamentZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczMarcin Warchoł11 January March in WarsawEuropean Association of JudgesZiobroFree CourtsdecommunizationEwa WrzosekEU law primacyhuman rightsPiebiak gaterecommendationreportLaw on the NCJlex NGORussiaCCBEpublic opinion pollHuman Rights CommissionerJarosław GowinPiotr PszczółkowskiLGBT ideology free zonesC-791/19coronaviruscriminal coderetirement ageNetherlandsAdam Tomczyńskidemocratic backslidingintimidation of dissentersThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeBogdan ŚwięczkowskitransferBelgiumJoanna Scheuring-WielgusNations in TransitCouncil of the EUElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikKatarzyna ChmuraSebastian MazurekJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiLIBE Committeedefamatory statementsMałgorzata FroncRafał LisakKarolina MiklaszewskaNGOKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczIrena BochniakoppositionEuropean Court of Huelectoral commissionsAct on the Supreme CourtdiscriminationJakub KwiecińskiWorld Justice Project awardTomasz Koszewskitest of independenceDariusz DończykGrzegorz FurmankiewiczAntykastaStanisław ZdunAdam Gendźwiłł2018Wojciech SadurskiFull-Scale Election Observation MissionODIHRMarek Jaskulskirepairing the rule of lawadvocate generalpress release#RecoveryFilesmedia pluralismMichał DworczykDworczyk leaksE-mail scandalAndrzej SkowronRights and Values ProgrammeTomasz SzmydtŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoMonika FrąckowiakEmilia SzmydtSwieczkowskiKasta/AntykastaBohdan BieniekStanisław ZabłockiJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekGrzegorz PudaNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeWiesław KozielewiczFrans TimmermansMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakUS Department of StateMarcin KrajewskiEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaPaweł StyrnaC-619/18Arkadiusz CichockiCT PresidentMarcin Matczakequal treatmentNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)codification commissiondelegationsWatchdog PolskaDariusz BarskiLasotafundamental rightsState Tribunalinsultcivil lawRadosław BaszukAction PlanJustice MinistryVěra JourováDonald Tuskjustice system reformAnti-SLAPP DirectiveHater ScandalpopulismNational Council for the Judiciarycivil partnerships billKRSJudicial Reformsmigration strategyPenal CodeLGBTQ+NIKProfetosame-sex unionsKatarzyna Kotulacivil partnershipsHelsinki Foundation for Human RightsPiotr HofmańskiC‑718/21preliminary referenceEU lawethicsChamber of Professional ResponsibilityThe Codification Committee of Civil LawInvestigationPoznańKrzysztof Rączkaextraordinary commissionZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaCourt of Appeal in WarsawOsiatyński'a Archivetransitional justiceUS State DepartmentAssessment ActCrimes of espionageJoanna KnobelAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszKoan LenaertsKarol WeitzKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFJustyna Wydrzyńskaenvironmentinvestmentstrategic investmentRafał WojciechowskiAleksandra RutkowskaGeneral Court of the EUArkadiusz RadwanLech WałęsaWałęsa v. Polandright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawpilot-judgmentDobrochna Bach-Goleckaelection fairnessNational Broadcasting Councilgag lawsuitslex RaczkowskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActdisinformationlustrationWhite PaperEUDonald Tusk governmentjudgePrzemysław CzarnekJózsef SzájerRafał TrzaskowskiKlubrádióSobczyńska and Others v PolandŻurek v PolandGazeta WyborczaGrzęda v PolandPollitykaJelenmedia lawIndex.huJacek CzaputowiczElżbieta KarskaPrzemysła Radzikmedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMABrussels IRome IILGBT free zonesFirst President of the Suprme CourtBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeOlsztyn courtPrzemysła CzarnekequalityMarek PiertuszyńskiChamber of Extraordinary VerificationArticle 2Forum shoppinghate speechEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian Kaletahate crimesC-156/21C-157/21Education Ministerthe Regional Court in Warsawproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońGermanyCelmermutual trustabortion rulingLMUnited NationsLeszek MazurAmsterdamIrena Majcherinterim measuresIrelandautocratizationMultiannual Financial FrameworkC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUC-487/19Norwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsNorwegian fundsNorwayKraśnikOmbudsmanZbigniew BoniekENAArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service Actpublic broadcasterForum Współpracy SędziówSimpson judgmentAK judgmentlegislative practiceforeign agents lawrepressive actMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitLSOtrans-Atlantic valuesDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandAmnesty InternationalThe First President of the Supreme CourtErnest BejdaJacek Sasinright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychAct of 20 December 2019Michał WośMinistry of FinancelawyersFrackowiakPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikKochenovPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasMałgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderekct on the Protection of the PopulatioPechlegislationlex WośKaczyńskiPutinismCourt of Appeal in KrakówMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAct sanitising the judiciaryECJMarek AstFreedom in the WorldEvgeni TanchevRome StatuteIsraelEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficeEU valuesPolish National FoundationLux Veritatisinfringment actionMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykPKWENCJoligarchic systemclientelismIpsosOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258Leon Kieresresolution of 23 January 2020Telex.huEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtAlina CzubieniakMaciej RutkiewiczharrassmentMirosław WróblewskiprimacyborderGerard BirgfellerTVNjournalistslexTVNpostal vote billPolish mediapostal voteEwa MaciejewskaRzeszówKoen Lenaerts