PiS wants to fight Putin, but save its own Putinism


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


PiS claims there are fewer attacks on the EU and Brussels, but this is only ostensible peace. The propaganda of the authorities targeted at the EU is sending the message: since there is a war, let us rule without restrictions.

by Marek Beylin


Putin’s aggression against Ukraine has dampened the political war that PiS has been waging for years in Poland. And supporters of both the opposition parties and PiS can be found in the spontaneous mass solidarity of the Poles with the Ukrainian refugees, which somewhat reduces the differences between them. So there is a kind of ad hoc national consensus being built against Putin.


However, PiS still wants to monopolistically define and impose the conditions of this consensus. This is visible in this party’s propaganda.


Since PiS’s anti-European policy is in ruins, the ruling party is looking for a way of positioning itself anew in the EU, but without abandoning its authoritarian doctrine of power. There are therefore fewer attacks on the EU and Brussels in PiS’s statements, while stories about how the EU and the West want to destroy the Polish nation with a new totalitarian revolution, or in other words, in fact, the assertion of the rights of discriminated social groups, have (for the time being?) been silenced. And the crackdown on women asserting their rights and on LGBT+ has also calmed down.


However, this is ostensible peace, because PiS propaganda today is focusing on three matters.


Firstly, it is presenting Prime Minister Morawiecki as the new de facto leader of the EU. It is he who is supposed to convince the EU to be assertive with respect to Russia. According to these statements, Morawiecki is responsible for the introduction of the harsh EU sanctions and the aid to Ukraine, including military hardware. So it is only because of the prime minister that we have a strong EU united against Putin’s aggression. Suddenly, the friendship with the extreme European anti-EU and pro-Putin right wing, which PiS was boasting until recently, has evaporated from the content of this propaganda. There was never any such thing.


Secondly, the PiS propagandists are attacking the opposition, presenting them as Putin’s military accomplices. The attack is especially targeted at Donald Tusk the most important figure in the opposition. This is because, in this version, all people and all formations that still support the rule of law in Poland and do not want to persuade Europe to allow PiS to continue its authoritarian consolidation of power are Putinists. Of course, this is about the Reconstruction Fund and the ‘money for the rule of law’ mechanism. According to PiS, Putin’s war gives Jarosław Kaczyński the right to rule Poland as he pleases.


As one of the party’s leading propagandists, Michał Karnowski, put it, these actions by the EU in defence of the rule of law ‘have always been a victory of egoism over the common good. Today they are becoming a crime.’ A crime ‘against our common security, against our stability, against our ability to help an attacked neighbour’. Therefore, opposition, ‘if you are really concerned about the fate of Ukraine, then release the blockades you have established’.


Of course, neither this nor numerous similar texts contain a word about the fact that PiS could agree to make any concessions regarding its power. After all, this is about defiling the opposition by including it in Putin’s camp, and contrasting it against PiS, which in these terms is becoming the leading pro-European force, to which Morawiecki’s role is supposed to testify.


Thirdly, according to the party’s statements, the Polish opposition is marching as Putin’s recruits together with Germany. ‘It is clear today that it was Berlin – perhaps in consultation with Moscow – that attacked Poland with the aid of the EU institutions it controlled. The point was to weaken the most important country in the region, to build a grey area in which the two superpowers freely share their influence,’ wrote Jacek Karnowski, also a top representative of PiS’s ideology. This is how the map of national treason looks.


These arguments are not only about erasing PiS’s alliance with the European Putinists from public memory. Of greater importance is the looming proposition to the EU: since there is a war, leave PiS in peace, let us rule without restrictions.


There is no way of establishing today to what extent the EU will be willing to accept such a deal. I hope it rejects it. After all, it should know how dangerous Putinism as a doctrine of internal authority is for the EU and Europe. Meanwhile, PiS has been professing this doctrine for years, although it has only partially implemented it. The destruction of the judiciary and laws, the repression of opponents, illegal wiretapping, including the Pegasus scandal – these are the achievements of authority in the spirit of Putinism. As can be seen from party propaganda, PiS does not want to withdraw from this doctrine of power. The ruling party’s and Kaczyński’s ambition is to fight off Putin, to save its own Putinism.


Transleted by Roman Wojtasz


Published in Polish at Gazeta Wyborcza, 7 March 2022.


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland



March 9, 2022


Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaldisciplinary proceedingsPolandrule of lawZbigniew Ziobrojudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionNational Council of the JudiciaryjudgesEuropean UnionCourt of JusticeAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemEuropean Court of Human RightsCommissioner for Human RightsCJEUMinister of JusticeMateusz MorawieckiJarosław KaczyńskiWaldemar Żurekmuzzle lawpresidential electionsjudiciaryAdam Bodnarpreliminary rulingsdemocracyK 3/21Hungaryelections 2020Kamil ZaradkiewiczBeata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme Courtprosecutorsdisciplinary commissionerEuropean Arrest WarrantProsecutor GeneralConstitutionCOVID-19Maciej NawackiPrzemysław RadzikJulia PrzyłębskaPresidentmedia freedomfreedom of expressionCourt of Justice of the European Unioncriminal lawMarek SafjanAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPaweł JuszczyszynNational Public ProsecutorPiotr Schabcriminal proceedingsPrime Ministerfreedom of assemblyStanisław BiernatExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberSupreme Administrative Courtconditionality mechanismconditionalityEU budgetWłodzimierz WróbelCriminal ChamberLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeNational Prosecutordisciplinary liability for judgeselectionsWojciech HermelińskiStanisław PiotrowiczAndrzej ZollMałgorzata Gersdorfacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisK 7/21May 10 2020 electionsLex DudaNational Council for JudiciarySejmXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v Polandmedia independenceIustitiaSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczTHEMISEAWmediaimmunityAnna DalkowskaCouncil of Europe2017policeFreedom HouseLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaSupreme Court PresidentArticle 7Venice CommissionPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaŁukasz PiebiakP 7/20Justice FundPiSC-791/19National Electoral CommissionAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21Piotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakPegasusGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgeslex NGOcivil societyRussiaNational Reconstruction PlanJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraPresident of PolandPresident of the Republic of PolandJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesReczkowicz and Others v. PolandKrystian MarkiewiczMichał LasotaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczdefamationcourtsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsArticle 6 ECHRUrsula von der LeyenEwa WrzosekEU law primacyTVPLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independencedemocratic backslidingViktor OrbanOLAFdecommunizationNext Generation EUvetoJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJJustice Defence Committee – KOSrecommendationTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiHuman Rights CommissionerMarek MazurkiewiczCCBEAndrzej MączyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskireportBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersEuropean ParliamentOKO.pressZiobroMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskiPiotr GąciarekRegional Court in KrakówPiebiak gatehuman rightscorruptionEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyneo-judgescoronavirusXero Flor v. PolandEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej Rutkiewiczresolution of 23 January 2020Mirosław WróblewskiCivil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaLeon Kieresright to protestSławomir JęksaPKWWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMariusz Kamińskiinfringment actionsurveillanceEU valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauENCJJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiIsraelŁukasz Radkeforeign agents lawpolexitNational Recovery PlanDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeProfessional Liability ChamberFirst President of the Suprme CourtsuspensionPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościLGBT free zonesAct sanitising the judiciaryequalityMarek AstMaciej FerekChamber of Extraordinary VerificationEdyta Barańskahate crimesCourt of Appeal in Krakówhate speechPutinismcriminal codeKaczyńskiGrzęda v Polandright to fair trialPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasŻurek v PolandMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekSobczyńska and Others v Polandct on the Protection of the PopulatioparliamentlegislationRafał Trzaskowskilex WośUkrainemedia lawRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtKonrad WytrykowskiJarosław DudziczPrzemysła RadzikJakub IwaniecAntykastaSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieAK judgmentSimpson judgmentForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsLeszek MazurMaciej Miterapopulisminterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s Officeintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatetransferPechOlsztyn courtKochenovPrzemysła CzarnekEvgeni TanchevEducation MinisterFreedom in the WorldKrystyna PawłowiczECJIpsosFrackowiakOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeretirement ageMariusz MuszyńskiAmnesty InternationalHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr Bogdanowicztrans-Atlantic valuesPiotr BurasLSOauthoritarian equilibriumlawyersArticle 258Act of 20 December 2019clientelismoligarchic systemRecovery FundEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officerepressive actPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisKoen LenaertsMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykharrassmentMarian BanaśAlina CzubieniakSupreme Audit OfficeTVNjournalistslexTVNGerard BirgfellerEwa MaciejewskaPolish mediapostal voteKrakówRzeszówDagmara Pawełczyk-Woickaborderpostal vote billprimacy