‘LGBT-free’ municipalities will not receive millions of zlotys from Norwegian funds

Share

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland

More

Municipalities that declared themselves ‘LGBT ideology-free zones’ will not receive funding from Norwegian funds. This means a loss of €3–10 million for Kraśnik alone.



The text was posted in Polish at OKO.press on 19 September

 

by Daniel Flis

 

‘Kraśnik and municipalities with similar declarations have not received project support in the current financing period and will not receive such support as long as these declarations remain valid. This also applies to all institutions under the control of the municipal authorities,’ said Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs Ine Eriksen Soreide, referring to the Polish ‘LGBT ideology-free zones’.

 

Her position was posted on the Norwegian parliament’s website on 14 September. This was the response to a question from MP and former minister, Anniken Huitfeldt, about the award of funds to municipalities which have passed resolutions on ‘LGBT-free zones’.

 

These are funds from the European Economic Area Financial Mechanism (EEA Funds), the so-called Norwegian funds. They comprise funds that Norway, Liechtenstein, and Iceland transfer to EU countries as non-refundable financing in the form of development aid in return for their participation in the common EU area. Poland is their largest beneficiary.

 

‘Such declarations are inconsistent with the values on which European cooperation is based. There are also premises for stating that they breach the European Convention on Human Rights. LGBT people are entitled to the same protection against breaches of their personal rights and freedoms as all other citizens of Europe,’ explained the Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs.

 

105 LGBT ideology-free local authorities

Świdnik’s councillors (Lublin Voivodship) established the first ‘LGBT-free’ zone in March 2019.

 

Since then, 105 local authorities have passed similar resolutions. Among them are municipalities, counties and five voivodships: Lubelskie, Łódzkie, Małopolskie, Podkarpackie and Świętokrzyskie.

 

Some of them are in the form of extremely homophobic resolutions ‘against the LGBT ideology’, while others are in the form of the ‘Local Government Charter of the Rights of the Family’ prepared by lawyers from Ordo Iuris.

 

Local authorities that have passed or rejected homophobic resolutions can be seen on the ‘Atlas of Hate’, a map prepared by activists Kuba Gawron, Paulina Pająk, and Paweł Parenta. The activists were nominated for the Sacharov Prize, which is awarded by the European Parliament for outstanding work in support of human rights.

 

The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs pointed out that grants to municipalities that have not declared themselves ‘LGBT-free’, which are located in counties or voivodships that have passed such resolutions will not be suspended. Non-governmental organizations operating within their territory can also rest easy.

 

Minister Ine Eriksen Soreide announced that Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein will soon inform the Polish authorities in detail about how they should interpret the regulations on their allocation.

 

For Kraśnik, which is mentioned directly in the statement of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the withdrawal of Norwegian funds could mean a loss of several million zlotys. The town in the Lubelskie Voivodship with a population of 30,000 qualified for the second stage of the Local Development Programme financed by Norwegian and EEA funds.

 

‘Kraśnik has a good chance of obtaining €3–10 million. The inhabitants, non-governmental organizations, officials, and experts from the Association of Polish Cities have put a great deal of effort into our project. We have been preparing to apply for a year. Towns such as Kraśnik are struggling with a number of environmental, economic and social problems,’ Daniel Niedzialka, the press officer of Kraśnik’s mayor told the Lublin edition of ‘Wyborcza’.

 

Kraśnik’s councillors will vote on whether to repeal the resolution on the ‘LGBT free zone’ on Tuesday, 22 September. The initiator of this draft resolution is Paweł Kurek, a Nowoczesna councillor. He previously abstained, when the council voted on the homophobic resolution.

 

The town council will also vote on a resolution to adopt the Local Government Charter of the Rights of the Family on the same day on the initiative of, among others, the PiS councillors. The charter, which was prepared, among others, by Ordo Iuris, speaks of: ‘The protection of the family, marriage as a union of a woman and a man, parenthood and motherhood, the right to protect family life, the right of parents to raise their children in accordance with their own convictions and the child’s right to be protected against demoralization.’

 

Sanctions of the European Commission and twinned towns

The French town of Nogent-sur-Oise suspended its cooperation with Kraśnik as its response to Kraśnik’s declaration of being an LGBT-free zone. Its mayor announced this the day after  OKO.press reported it to 52 foreign partners of 13 Polish homophobic local authorities.

 

The European Commission sent a letter in June to the marshals of the five voivodships that had passed anti-LGBT resolutions. In that letter, it instructed the marshals to check whether the local authorities which are beneficiaries of EU funds are discriminating against the LGBT community in their activities.

 

On Wednesday, while addressing the European Parliament on the State of the Union, Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, once again strongly addressed the issue, saying: ‘I will not rest when it comes to building a Union of equality. A Union where you can be who you are and love who you want – without fear of recrimination or discrimination. Because being yourself is not your ideology, It’s your identity. And no one can ever take it away. So I want to be crystal clear – LGBTQI–free zones are humanity free zones. And they have no place in our Union.’

 

The EC’s warnings have brought no result. None of the local authorities has repealed the homophobic resolution to this day. However, four of them were overruled by the administrative courts, which held that, contrary to the constitution, they exclude LGBT people from the community of residents. Complaints were filed by the Ombudsman and the Campaign Against Homophobia.

 

These are not the first restrictions imposed by the Norwegian government on the award of EEA funds to Poland. In February 2020, Norway withdrew from transferring 700 million krones (approximately PLN 292 million) to the justice administration programme. ‘This is a clear signal to the Polish authorities that the Norwegian Government is concerned about developments regarding the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary in Poland,’ explained Audun Halvorsen, Secretary of State of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

 

Translated by Roman Wojtasz



Author


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


More

Published

September 21, 2020

Tags

Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional TribunalPolandjudgesdisciplinary proceedingsrule of lawZbigniew ZiobroCourt of Justice of the EUNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionMałgorzata ManowskaAndrzej DudaCourt of JusticeIgor TuleyaEuropean Court of Human Rightsdisciplinary systemMinister of JusticeJarosław KaczyńskiMateusz MorawieckiCJEUmuzzle lawCommissioner for Human RightsNational Recovery PlanAdam BodnardemocracyWaldemar ŻurekPrzemysław Radzikcriminal lawpresidential electionselectionsKamil Zaradkiewiczdisciplinary commissionerPiotr Schabmedia freedomneo-judgeselections 2023judiciaryFirst President of the Supreme Courtpreliminary rulingsSupreme Administrative CourtHungaryelections 2020K 3/21Dagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaNational Council for JudiciaryharassmentJulia PrzyłębskaProsecutor GeneralprosecutorsŁukasz PiebiakMichał LasotaBeata MorawiecPaweł JuszczyszynCourt of Justice of the European UnionPrime MinisterPresidentConstitutionCOVID-19European Arrest WarrantMaciej NawackiCriminal ChamberRegional Court in KrakówRecovery FundExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberEU budgetfreedom of expressiondisciplinary liability for judgesWojciech HermelińskiMarek SafjanMałgorzata GersdorfSejmMaciej Ferekfreedom of assemblyconditionalityLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeJustice FundNational ProsecutorPiSStanisław PiotrowiczAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPresident of the Republic of PolandIustitiacourtsTHEMISimmunityAnna DalkowskaNational Public ProsecutorCouncil of Europecriminal proceedingsStanisław Biernatconditionality mechanismWłodzimierz WróbelLabour and Social Security Chambercommission on Russian influence2017policeJustice Defence Committee – KOSFreedom HouseSupreme Court PresidentArticle 7Venice CommissionPM Mateusz MorawieckiNational Electoral CommissionJarosław WyrembakAndrzej Zollacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisMay 10 2020 electionsPresident of PolandLGBTXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandReczkowicz and Others v. Polandmedia independenceKrystian MarkiewiczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczMichał WawrykiewiczArticle 6 ECHREAWUrsula von der LeyenTVPmediaLex Super OmniaLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationAndrzej StępkaPiotr GąciarekcorruptionP 7/20K 7/21Lex DudaNational Reconstruction PlanProfessional Liability ChambersuspensionparliamentJarosław DudziczChamber of Professional Liabilityelectoral codePiotr Prusinowskidemocratic backslidingdecommunizationLaw on the NCJrecommendationHuman Rights CommissionerCCBEThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europepublic opinion pollreportEuropean ParliamentZiobrointimidation of dissenterstransferretirement agePiebiak gatehuman rightsEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawcoronavirusC-791/19Piotr PszczółkowskiGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgeslex NGOcivil societyRussiaJarosław GowinLGBT ideology free zonescriminal codeSenateZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczMarcin WarchołdefamationFree CourtsEwa WrzosekEU law primacyAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independenceMaciej MiteraViktor OrbanOLAFNext Generation EUvetoabortionJózef IwulskiTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiMarek MazurkiewiczAndrzej MączyńskiJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław RymarFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersSLAPPOKO.pressDariusz ZawistowskiMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskiKrystyna PawłowiczMariusz MuszyńskiPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiMarian BanaśSupreme Audit OfficeAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyKrakówXero Flor v. PolandAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21Civil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaPegasusMariusz KamińskisurveillanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraEdyta Barańskaright to fair trialUkraineKonrad WytrykowskiJakub IwaniecDariusz DrajewiczRafał Puchalskismear campaignmilestonesConstitutional Tribunal PresidentMarzanna Piekarska-Drążekelectoral processWojciech Maczugapublic medialexTuskcourt changeselections integrityelections fairnessabuse of state resourcesPATFoxpopulismequal treatmentfundamental rightsCT PresidentEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUStanisław ZabłockiLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardWojciech SadurskijudgePechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakAmnesty Internationaltrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote billresolution of 23 January 2020Leon KieresPKWinfringment actionEU valuesENCJIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieAK judgmentSimpson judgmentForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsLeszek Mazurinterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europemedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióGazeta WyborczaPollitykaBrussels IRome IIArticle 2Forum shoppingtransparencyEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian KaletaC-156/21C-157/21Marek PiertuszyńskiNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOlsztyn courtPrzemysła CzarnekEducation MinisterIpsosOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258clientelismoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficePolish National FoundationLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykTVNjournalistslexTVNPolish mediaRzeszówborderprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczMirosław Wróblewskiright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMichał WośMinistry of FinanceJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAct sanitising the judiciaryMarek AstCourt of Appeal in KrakówPutinismKaczyńskiPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasMałgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderekct on the Protection of the Populatiolegislationlex WośRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtAntykastaStanisław ZdunIrena BochniakKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczKatarzyna ChmuraGrzegorz FurmankiewiczMarek JaskulskiJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaPaweł StyrnaKasta/AntykastaAndrzej SkowronŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoMonika FrąckowiakArkadiusz CichockiEmilia SzmydtTomasz SzmydtE-mail scandalDworczyk leaksMichał Dworczykmedia pluralism#RecoveryFilesrepairing the rule of lawBohdan BieniekMarcin KrajewskiMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsWiesław KozielewiczNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeGrzegorz PudaPiotr MazurekJerzy KwaśniewskiPetros Tovmasyancourt presidentsODIHRFull-Scale Election Observation MissionNGOKarolina MiklaszewskaRafał LisakMałgorzata FroncJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiSebastian MazurekElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikSzymon Szynkowski vel SękJoanna Scheuring-Wielgusinsulting religious feelingsoppositionAdam GendźwiłłDariusz Dończyktest of independenceTomasz KoszewskiJakub KwiecińskidiscriminationAct on the Supreme Courtelectoral commissionsEuropean Court of HuKrzysztof RączkaPoznańKoan LenaertsKarol WeitzKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFJustyna WydrzyńskaAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszJoanna KnobelCrimes of espionageextraordinary commissionZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaCourt of Appeal in WarsawOsiatyński'a ArchiveUS State DepartmentAssessment Actenvironmentinvestmentstrategic investmentgag lawsuitslex RaczkowskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActdisinformationNational Broadcasting Councilelection fairnessDobrochna Bach-GoleckaRafał WojciechowskiAleksandra RutkowskaGeneral Court of the EUArkadiusz RadwanLech WałęsaWałęsa v. Polandright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawpilot-judgmentDonald Tusk governmentSLAPPscivil lawRadosław Baszuk