Lacking a majority, PiS needs the Senate to install a new Commissioner for Human Rights

Share

Journalist at OKO.press and Archiwum Osiatyńskiego

More

The Senate in opposition hands means the end of Law and Justice’s dreams of subordinating the Office of the Commissioner of Human Rights. Without the consent of senators, the new Commissioner will not take up the post in 2020 after Adam Bodnar’s current term ends. If the Senate rejects the candidates put forward by PiS, Bodnar may remain in the post of Commissioner longer. And continue to point out where PiS is breaking the law.



In the recent parliamentary elections, candidates put forward by a coalition of opposition parties won a majority in the Senate, taking 51 out of 100 seats. Law and Justice no longer dominates the upper house of the Polish Parliament.

 

The group of new senators is comprised of 43 candidates from Civic Coalition (Koalicja Obywatelska, KO), 2 from Democratic Left Alliance (SLD), 3 from the Polish Peasants’ Party (PSL), and 3 independent candidates affiliated with centre-right Civic Platform (Platforma Obywatelska, PO) and liberal Nowoczesna.

 

Although the takeover of the Senate is a triumph for the united opposition, the powers of the upper house – compared to those of the Sejm – are quite restricted. Senators may slow down the Law and Justice legislative machine, but they can’t stop it.

 

The Senate does, however, enjoy some definite competences in another area raising a touchy issue for Jarosław Kaczyński’s party – the selection of a new Commissioner for Human Rights.

 

The present Commissioner, Adam Bodnar, finishes his term of office in September 2020. Without Senators’ consent no candidate submitted by the Sejm, controlled by PiS, can replace him.

 

Bodnar to remain?

 

Pursuant to Article 209(1) of the Polish constitution, the Commissioner for Human Rights is appointed by the Sejm for a five-year term, subject to the consent of the Senate. The process under which the Senate expresses its consent is specified in Article 3 of the Act on the Commissioner for Human Rights.

 

According to that provision, senators have one month from the day on which the Sejm forwards its resolution. If the Senate refuses, the Sejm must present a new candidate. The procedure repeats itself until the Senate gives its consent. The outgoing Commissioner remains in office until the new Commissioner takes up the post.

 

Adam Bodnar was appointed Commissioner for Human Rights on 9 September 2015 – just before the PO-PSL government’s term ended. He replaced Irena Lipowicz in the office. The successful candidate to replace him will have to demonstrate independence from political authorities, which the constitution requires of the Commissioner. Until the right person is found, Bodnar will continue as the acting Commissioner.

 

This would not be the first time the Commissioner’s term has been extended. In June 2005, Andrzej Zoll was supposed to leave the post of Commissioner, but the person chosen by the Sejm to replace him – Andrzej Rzepliński – was rejected by the Senate. Ultimately, Janusz Kochanowski, the candidate submitted by PiS MPs, took up the post, but not until February 2006.

 

The Sejm may attempt to amend the legislation governing the Commissioner for Human Rights. But every change that undermines the position of the Senate and its competence to give consent is a violation of the constitution. This, however, is something PiS has been quite comfortable doing in the past.

 

Commissioner a thorn in Kaczyński’s side

 

For PiS, the position of Commissioner is primarily a matter of image. During his term of office, Adam Bodnar has not hesitated to criticise the government. He has intervened in such issues as the pharmaceutical crisis, educational “reform”, pedestrian safety, temporary arrest, the reform of the criminal code being prepared by Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro, propaganda by state television, the Institute of National Remembrance, and access to legal abortion procedures. On multiple occasions he has also criticised the “reform” of the judicial system.

 

The Commissioner’s role is to work in defence of human rights, including those of the LGBT community, which has been subjected to a systematic campaign of dehumanization by Law and Justice.

 

He has experienced numerous problems owing to his engagement – the authorities have accused him of political bias, threatened to remove him from office, and his budget has been cut. The height of the animosity came with the annual reports given by the Commissioner in the Sejm and Senate, where he was subjected to a harsh stream of invective. State broadcaster TVP, itself under control of the ruling PiS, also engaged in a smear campaign against him.

 

Yet despite all the pressure, Adam Bodnar has refused to be silenced.

 

“My term of office will last for another 14 months. And during that time, I will not leave the authorities alone. That’s the oath I took. I plan to make the best use of every day I have left in office. Because I’m committed to solving the real problems faced by citizens,” – he said on 9 July 2019 at a session of the Senate justice committee.

 

Bodnar’s work as Commissioner has led to his receiving multiple prestigious international awards.

 

What can the Commissioner do?

 

The Office of Commissioner for Human Rights is established by the Polish constitution which sets out the Commissioner’s powers in Articles 208–212. The Commissioner has two modes of action:

 

    • responding to submissions made by citizens (under Art. 80 of the Constitution)
    • initiating proceedings based on media reports, information about exceptional situations, or following inspections performed by the Office of the Commissioner, such as in prisons

 

The role of the Commissioner is to monitor whether public officials in Poland respect in their activities the human rights guaranteed under the Polish constitution and other relevant legal documents. According to the 2018 Annual Report of the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights, a total of 57,000 submissions and complaints were reviewed. The Commissioner intervened in issues covering the following areas:

 

    • police violence
    • hate speech
    • environmental protection
    • parents’ rights
    • building society books
    • problems facing the homeless
    • insufficient transport in rural areas
    • health service
    • access to secondary education
    • consumer rights
    • surveillance
    • exclusion from public life

 

The Commissioner can intervene in such cases to state authorities and institutions, make formal complaints regarding the misapplication of the law, and point out deficiencies in the provisions of existing legislation. The Commissioner can also apply to the Constitutional Tribunal for a declaration of incompatibility of legal acts with the constitution, as well as submit questions of law and cassation filings to the Supreme Court.

 

[translated by Matthew La Fontaine]



Author


Journalist at OKO.press and Archiwum Osiatyńskiego


More

Published

October 16, 2019

Tags

Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaldisciplinary proceedingsPolandZbigniew Ziobrorule of lawEuropean CommissionjudgesCourt of Justice of the EUNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceEuropean UnionCourt of JusticeAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaIgor TuleyaEuropean Court of Human Rightsdisciplinary systemMateusz MorawieckiCommissioner for Human RightsCJEUMinister of JusticeJarosław KaczyńskiWaldemar Żurekdemocracymuzzle lawpresidential electionsPiotr SchabjudiciaryAdam Bodnarpreliminary rulingsK 3/21Hungaryelections 2020Kamil Zaradkiewiczdisciplinary commissionerBeata MorawiecPrzemysław RadzikFirst President of the Supreme CourtprosecutorsMichał LasotaEuropean Arrest WarrantMaciej NawackiPrime MinisterJulia Przyłębskamedia freedomProsecutor GeneralConstitutionCOVID-19electionsNational Recovery PlanNational Council for JudiciaryPresidentSupreme Administrative Courtfreedom of expressionŁukasz PiebiakCourt of Justice of the European Unioncriminal lawDagmara Pawełczyk-Woickadisciplinary liability for judgesWojciech HermelińskiMarek SafjanMałgorzata GersdorfAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPaweł JuszczyszynAnna DalkowskaNational Public Prosecutorcriminal proceedingsfreedom of assemblyStanisław BiernatExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamberconditionality mechanismconditionalityEU budgetWłodzimierz WróbelCriminal ChamberLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeNational ProsecutorStanisław PiotrowiczJarosław WyrembakAndrzej Zollacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisK 7/21May 10 2020 electionsLex DudaNational Reconstruction PlanPresident of PolandPresident of the Republic of PolandSejmXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v Polandmedia independenceIustitiaJarosław DudziczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczArticle 6 ECHRTHEMISEAWUrsula von der LeyenChamber of Professional LiabilitymediaimmunityCouncil of Europe2017policeJustice Defence Committee – KOSFreedom HouseLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaSupreme Court PresidentArticle 7Venice CommissionPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaRegional Court in KrakówRecovery FundP 7/20Justice Fundneo-judgesPiSC-791/19National Electoral CommissionAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21Piotr PszczółkowskiPegasusGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgeslex NGOcivil societyRussiaProfessional Liability ChamberJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikorasuspensionJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesReczkowicz and Others v. PolandUkraineKrystian MarkiewiczKonrad WytrykowskiJakub IwaniecZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczDariusz DrajewiczRafał PuchalskidefamationcourtsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekEwa WrzosekEU law primacyTVPLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independenceMaciej Miterademocratic backslidingViktor OrbanOLAFdecommunizationNext Generation EUvetoJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJrecommendationTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiHuman Rights CommissionerMarek MazurkiewiczCCBEAndrzej MączyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskireportBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersEuropean ParliamentOKO.pressZiobroMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskitransferPiotr GąciarekKrystyna PawłowiczMariusz MuszyńskiPiebiak gatehuman rightscorruptionEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyKrakówcoronavirusXero Flor v. PolandEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej Rutkiewiczresolution of 23 January 2020Mirosław WróblewskiCivil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaLeon Kieresright to protestSławomir JęksaPKWWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMariusz Kamińskiinfringment actionsurveillanceEU valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauENCJJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiIsraelŁukasz Radkeforeign agents lawpolexitDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościLGBT free zonesAct sanitising the judiciaryequalityMarek AstMaciej FerekChamber of Extraordinary VerificationEdyta Barańskahate crimesCourt of Appeal in Krakówhate speechPutinismcriminal codeKaczyńskiGrzęda v Polandright to fair trialPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasŻurek v PolandMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekSobczyńska and Others v Polandct on the Protection of the PopulatioparliamentlegislationRafał Trzaskowskilex Wośmedia lawRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtPrzemysła RadzikAntykastaSenateStanisław ZdunIrena BochniakKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczMarcin WarchołKatarzyna ChmuraElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiGrzegorz FurmankiewiczJacek CzaputowiczMarek JaskulskiPrzemysław CzarnekJoanna Kołodziej-Michałowiczlegislative practiceEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaENAPaweł StyrnaZbigniew BoniekKasta/AntykastaAndrzej SkowronŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoOmbudsmanMonika FrąckowiakArkadiusz CichockiKraśnikEmilia SzmydtNorwayTomasz SzmydtNorwegian fundssmear campaignNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsE-mail scandalDworczyk leaksMichał DworczykC-487/19media pluralism#RecoveryFilesArticle 10 ECHRmilestonesConstitutional Tribunal PresidentRegional Court in Amsterdamrepairing the rule of lawharassmentOpenbaar MinisterieAK judgmentBohdan BieniekSimpson judgmentMarcin KrajewskiForum Współpracy SędziówMałgorzata Dobiecka-Woźniakelectoral processChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairspublic broadcasterWiesław KozielewiczNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeGrzegorz PudaPiotr MazurekJerzy Kwaśniewskimutual trustPetros Tovmasyancourt presidentsLMelections 2023ODIHRIrelandFull-Scale Election Observation MissionNGOIrena MajcherWojciech MaczugaAmsterdamKarolina MiklaszewskaRafał LisakMałgorzata FroncJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiSebastian Mazurekthe Regional Court in WarsawElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikUnited NationsLeszek Mazurpopulisminterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s Officeintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatePechOlsztyn courtKochenovPrzemysła CzarnekEvgeni TanchevEducation MinisterFreedom in the WorldECJIpsosFrackowiakOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeretirement ageAmnesty InternationalHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr Bogdanowicztrans-Atlantic valuesPiotr BurasLSOauthoritarian equilibriumlawyersArticle 258Act of 20 December 2019clientelismoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officerepressive actPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisKoen LenaertsMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykharrassmentMarian BanaśAlina CzubieniakSupreme Audit OfficeTVNjournalistslexTVNGerard BirgfellerEwa MaciejewskaPolish mediapostal voteRzeszówborderpostal vote billprimacy