“Kings of Life” in Polish prosecutor’s office – a report by the LSO Prosecutors’ Association

Share

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland

More

The report details the negative consequences of the changes in the prosecutorial service implemented by the Law and Justice government. It also reveals a number of pathological situations related mainly to personnel policy as the foundation of the so-called prosecutorial reform.



The Lex Super Omnia Prosecutors’ Association (LSO) was born out of an initiative to establish an independent association of prosecutors. Its activities include monitoring the current situation in the prosecutorial service and the state of the rule of law, publishing analyses and reports. After more than a year from the publishing of the organisation’s first report about changes in the prosecutorial service, LSO has presented another report titled “Kings of Life in the Prosecutor’s Office of Good Change”.

 

The report details the negative consequences of the changes in the prosecutorial service implemented by the Law and Justice government. It also reveals a number of pathological situations related mainly to personnel policy as the foundation of the so-called prosecutorial reform. It presents data on the implementation of statutory tasks and reveals a number of disturbing phenomena as well as conformist attitudes of some prosecutors that should be criticized. The data and findings presented in the report have been obtained through access to public information and also from websites of various institutions, including the National Public Prosecutor’s Office and the media.

 

As explained in the report, the main goal of the changes in the prosecutorial service was to replace existing prosecutors in order to employ the office in political battles rather than to improve its operation or the speed of proceedings. This is confirmed by systematically declining statistical results, visible mainly in the increasing number of proceedings of excessive lengths as well as increase in the duration and number of pre-trial detentions.

 

The new law resulted in the establishment of a group of faithful and loyal prosecutors focused around the current leadership of the prosecutorial service operating within a system based on favoritism. This group has begun gradually replacing independent, experienced and competent prosecutors in top positions.

 

The report presents consolidating mechanisms known as “institutional corruption” and its beneficiaries. It sheds light on the abuse of a special promotion mode under which promotions are received by people without any particular accomplishments. The document details the largest beneficiaries of the ruling party’s policies, people who have gained the most in the past three years, in terms of both promotion and finances. In addition to increased salaries following rapid promotions, there is also the issue of obtaining other benefits including financial bonuses, housing allowances, and remuneration for participation in various types of bodies. The key aspect is that they concern a group of people particularly closely related to the current leadership of the prosecutorial service, which enjoys the trust of Prosecutor General and Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro.

 

Another important issue discussed in the text is the abuse of horizontal delegations to other offices at the same or lower level, as well as transfers requiring a change in the place of residence – these measures a hidden disciplinary punishment used against individuals who speak out against changes being introduced by the ruling party.

 

The report also draws attention to the fact that the public prosecutor’s office has public funds and is obliged to spend them economically. Meanwhile, very serious doubts arise not only concerning the purchase of a new central office, whose price is shrouded in secrecy, but above all the spending of funds to adapt it to the standards of a modern office. There are also serious doubts about expenses related to absorbed EU funds. The programs presented in the document seem to be less than rational, and it can be concluded that in certain cases they constitute another form of obtaining additional remuneration by employees of the public prosecutor’s office.

 

This collection of abuses and improprieties deserves attention and demands changes in the future. The conclusions presented in the report indicate the poor condition of the prosecutorial service in Poland as well as threats to the rule of law and the independence of members of the justice system.

 

The full report is available to be downloaded here.

 

[by Barbara Sip]



Author


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


More

Published

September 20, 2019

Tags

Supreme Courtrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsjudicial independenceEuropean CommissionDisciplinary ChamberjudgesNational Council of the JudiciaryPolandCourt of JusticeConstitutional TribunalAndrzej DudaZbigniew ZiobroCourt of Justice of the EUpresidential electionsjudiciaryelections 2020European Unionpreliminary rulingsdemocracyMinister of JusticeJarosław Kaczyńskidisciplinary systemCommissioner for Human RightsFirst President of the Supreme CourtCJEUAdam Bodnarmuzzle lawIgor TuleyaCOVID-19OSCEdisciplinary commissionerPresidentProsecutor Generalprosecutorsfreedom of expressionLaw and Justiceelectionsacting first president of the Supreme CourtMay 10 2020 elections2017Freedom HouseExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberVenice CommissionConstitutionprosecutionNCJcriminal lawdisciplinary liability for judgesNational Electoral CommissionMarek SafjanKamil ZaradkiewiczGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesAleksander StepkowskiOrdo IurisEuropean Court of Human RightsPresident of PolandMałgorzata ManowskaJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesSejmWaldemar ŻurekZuzanna Rudzińska-Bluszczdemocratic backslidingdecommunizationMateusz MorawieckiPrime Ministerfreedom of assemblyJulia PrzyłębskaLaw on the NCJrecommendationHuman Rights CommissionerCCBEThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropereportZiobroPM Mateusz MorawieckiEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawHungaryNational ProsecutorcoronavirusPiSC-791/19Wojciech Hermelińskiresolution of 23 January 2020Stanisław PiotrowiczPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakLeon KieresAndrzej ZollPKWMałgorzata Gersdorfinfringment actionEU valuesENCJlex NGOcivil societyRussiaIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtPresident of the Republic of PolandLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechcriminal codeGrzęda v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia independencemedia lawIustitiaKrystian MarkiewiczPrzemysła RadzikMichał LasotaSenateSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceEuropean Arrest WarrantENAAmsterdam District CourtZbigniew BoniekdefamationcourtsKrzysztof ParchimowiczOmbudsmanBeata MorawiecKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairspopulismequal treatmentfundamental rightspoliceCT PresidentJustice Defence Committee – KOSEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justicepublic opinion pollSupreme Court President2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUStanisław ZabłockiArticle 7European ParliamentLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiSupreme Administrative Courtadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeconditionalityEU budgetC-619/18defamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskijudgetransferPechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakretirement ageAmnesty InternationalŁukasz PiebiakPiebiak gatehuman rightstrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakMinistry of JusticeJustice FundGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote bill