“Kings of Life” in Polish prosecutor’s office – a report by the LSO Prosecutors’ Association

Share

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland

More

The report details the negative consequences of the changes in the prosecutorial service implemented by the Law and Justice government. It also reveals a number of pathological situations related mainly to personnel policy as the foundation of the so-called prosecutorial reform.



The Lex Super Omnia Prosecutors’ Association (LSO) was born out of an initiative to establish an independent association of prosecutors. Its activities include monitoring the current situation in the prosecutorial service and the state of the rule of law, publishing analyses and reports. After more than a year from the publishing of the organisation’s first report about changes in the prosecutorial service, LSO has presented another report titled “Kings of Life in the Prosecutor’s Office of Good Change”.

 

The report details the negative consequences of the changes in the prosecutorial service implemented by the Law and Justice government. It also reveals a number of pathological situations related mainly to personnel policy as the foundation of the so-called prosecutorial reform. It presents data on the implementation of statutory tasks and reveals a number of disturbing phenomena as well as conformist attitudes of some prosecutors that should be criticized. The data and findings presented in the report have been obtained through access to public information and also from websites of various institutions, including the National Public Prosecutor’s Office and the media.

 

As explained in the report, the main goal of the changes in the prosecutorial service was to replace existing prosecutors in order to employ the office in political battles rather than to improve its operation or the speed of proceedings. This is confirmed by systematically declining statistical results, visible mainly in the increasing number of proceedings of excessive lengths as well as increase in the duration and number of pre-trial detentions.

 

The new law resulted in the establishment of a group of faithful and loyal prosecutors focused around the current leadership of the prosecutorial service operating within a system based on favoritism. This group has begun gradually replacing independent, experienced and competent prosecutors in top positions.

 

The report presents consolidating mechanisms known as “institutional corruption” and its beneficiaries. It sheds light on the abuse of a special promotion mode under which promotions are received by people without any particular accomplishments. The document details the largest beneficiaries of the ruling party’s policies, people who have gained the most in the past three years, in terms of both promotion and finances. In addition to increased salaries following rapid promotions, there is also the issue of obtaining other benefits including financial bonuses, housing allowances, and remuneration for participation in various types of bodies. The key aspect is that they concern a group of people particularly closely related to the current leadership of the prosecutorial service, which enjoys the trust of Prosecutor General and Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro.

 

Another important issue discussed in the text is the abuse of horizontal delegations to other offices at the same or lower level, as well as transfers requiring a change in the place of residence – these measures a hidden disciplinary punishment used against individuals who speak out against changes being introduced by the ruling party.

 

The report also draws attention to the fact that the public prosecutor’s office has public funds and is obliged to spend them economically. Meanwhile, very serious doubts arise not only concerning the purchase of a new central office, whose price is shrouded in secrecy, but above all the spending of funds to adapt it to the standards of a modern office. There are also serious doubts about expenses related to absorbed EU funds. The programs presented in the document seem to be less than rational, and it can be concluded that in certain cases they constitute another form of obtaining additional remuneration by employees of the public prosecutor’s office.

 

This collection of abuses and improprieties deserves attention and demands changes in the future. The conclusions presented in the report indicate the poor condition of the prosecutorial service in Poland as well as threats to the rule of law and the independence of members of the justice system.

 

The full report is available to be downloaded here.

 

[by Barbara Sip]



Author


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


More

Published

September 20, 2019

Tags

Supreme Courtdisciplinary proceedingsrule of lawjudicial independenceDisciplinary ChamberPolandEuropean CommissionjudgesZbigniew ZiobroCourt of Justice of the EUNational Council of the JudiciaryConstitutional TribunalEuropean UnionCourt of JusticeAndrzej DudaIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemMinister of Justicepresidential electionsjudiciarypreliminary rulingsdemocracyJarosław Kaczyńskielections 2020Beata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme CourtprosecutorsCJEUmuzzle lawCommissioner for Human RightsMałgorzata ManowskaEuropean Arrest WarrantCOVID-19European Court of Human Rightsdisciplinary commissionerPresidentAdam Bodnarfreedom of expressionHungaryKamil ZaradkiewiczOSCEMateusz MorawieckiProsecutor GeneralLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJNational Prosecutorelectionsacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisMay 10 2020 electionsWaldemar Żurekmedia independenceAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczEAWmediaAnna DalkowskaCouncil of Europe2017freedom of assemblyJulia PrzyłębskaFreedom HouseExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberVenice CommissionSupreme Administrative CourtEU budgetConstitutioncriminal lawMinistry of JusticeC-791/19disciplinary liability for judgesNational Electoral CommissionWojciech HermelińskiAndrzej ZollMarek SafjanGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesAleksander StepkowskiPresident of PolandJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesSejmMichał LasotaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramdefamationTHEMISMaciej NawackiTVPLex Super OmniaPaweł JuszczyszynBelgiumNetherlandsNational Public ProsecutorPiotr SchabPrzemysław Radzikdemocratic backslidingcriminal proceedingsViktor OrbandecommunizationNext Generation EUPrime MinistervetopoliceJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJLech GarlickirecommendationHuman Rights CommissionerCCBEThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeSupreme Court Presidentreportmedia freedomArticle 7European ParliamentZiobroconditionalityPM Mateusz MorawieckiEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawcoronavirusPiSresolution of 23 January 2020Stanisław PiotrowiczPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakLeon KieresPKWMałgorzata Gersdorfinfringment actionEU valuesENCJlex NGOcivil societyRussiaIsraelforeign agents lawOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtPresident of the Republic of PolandLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechcriminal codeGrzęda v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawIustitiaKrystian MarkiewiczPrzemysła RadzikSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekcourtsOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsC-487/19Article 6 ECHRArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieUrsula von der LeyenEwa WrzosekAK judgmentSimpson judgmentEU law primacyForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcasterAdam Tomczyńskiimmunitymutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamBogdan Święczkowskithe Regional Court in WarsawUnited Nationsjudcial independenceLeszek MazurMaciej Miterapopulisminterim measuresOLAFautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUJustice Defence Committee – KOSC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUStanisław BiernatTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaWhite PaperKazimierz DziałochalustrationMirosław Granattransitional justiceAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiEwa ŁętowskaMarek MazurkiewiczAndrzej MączyńskiJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy Stępień2018Piotr TulejaNations in TransitSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczCouncil of the EUMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiMarek Zubikmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerDidier ReyndersKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaOKO.pressUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-619/18defamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskijudgetransferPechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakretirement ageAmnesty InternationalŁukasz PiebiakPiebiak gatehuman rightstrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakJustice FundGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote bill