Judge Monika Frąckowiak: The authorities have demolished the system in Poland

Share

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland

More

Never before have the judges in Europe been so unified and united,’ says Monika Frąckowiak, judge of the District Court in Poznań.



An interview with judge Monika Frąckowiak who is a member of the Management Board of the Poznań branch of the Iustitia Association of Polish Judges and a member of the Management Board of MEDEL, European Judges and Public Prosecutors for Democracy and Fundamental Rights.

 

The interview was published in Rzeczpospolita daily in Polish.

 

Agata Łukaszewicz: From the latest reports in the media on the so-called hate scandal, it appears that you were personally affected by this matter. Were you surprised that Arkadiusz Cichocki, the former president of the Regional Court in Gliwice, was collecting information about you, probably not to praise you, but to hassle you?

 

I have already personally been feeling the effects of the so-called hate scandal since the turn of 2018/2019 and, in fact, the effects of the coordinated actions of the network of Ministry of Justice representatives, the disciplinary commissioners appointed by Zbigniew Ziobro, the judges who are loyal to him and the pro-government ‘journalists’ and online haters. It was only a matter of time before it was confirmed that these were organised activities. I already knew that Judge Cichocki was among those involved in the matter since the disclosure of the affair by Emilia Szmydt, in August 2019. Incidentally, it should be emphasised that she was the first to break the conspiracy of silence on this and she is paying a high price for it. The information provided by Judge Cichocki confirms that the data revealed by Emilia Szmydt is true and sheds more light on the pathology of the whole system created by Zbigniew Ziobro, Łukasz Piebiak and their collaborators.

 

Do you believe in his regret today? Have you spoken to him about this? Has he apologised?

 

I certainly appreciate that he has chosen to speak up. I understand that it was not easy. Of course, this does not erase the evil in which he participated, but it brings the perpetrators closer to being held accountable, who, despite being criminals, are still dealing the cards in the Polish justice system. I have no doubts that Arkadiusz Cichocki and Tomasz Szmydt were not the players dealing the cards in this disgusting procedure. I have never met Judge Cichocki in person, but he has apologised to me in public several times.

 

Are you counting on this case ending up in court? Is the prosecutor’s office in no hurry to clarify the matter?

 

I am convinced that sentences will be passed sooner or later against the perpetrators of the crimes committed in the so-called hate scandal (after all, the name is a euphemism in the light of the calibre of the breaches of the law). Emilia Szmydt, Arkadiusz Cichocki and Tomasz Szmydt will not be the last. There will certainly be more people who will start to talk. We already have enough evidence, including testimonies of witnesses, as well as secured data on IT media, to effectively seek redress in the civil courts (after all, such proceedings are already pending). The public prosecutor’s office is dragging out the case as much as it can, and the court has already held that its proceedings are being protracted. However, this will not protect the perpetrators from criminal liability in the future.

 

Have you ever wondered how the Ministry of Justice got so upset with you that it took such an interest in you?

 

In a way, it’s an honour, since I am just an ordinary district court judge. After all, it’s funny that Zbigniew Ziobro and his colleagues claimed from the beginning that they were fighting against the judicial ‘aristocracy’ concentrated mainly in the so-called palaces, namely the higher order courts. Meanwhile, the main resistance to the demolition of the rule of law in Poland is coming from the so-called ‘pits’, namely, from the district court judges. It seems to me that the authorities did not like my activity in the international arena. As a member of the management board of MEDEL (European Judges and Public Prosecutors for Democracy and Fundamental Rights), I meet regularly with lawyers and journalists from all over Europe, presenting the situation in Poland. I also represent Iustitia at international meetings.

 

What is the fate of the request for the preliminary ruling you submitted to the CJEU?

 

The CJEU has already issued its ruling, in which it once again pointed out the gross inconsistency of Polish law laid down by the so-called ‘good change’ with European law. Now, it’s the turn of the Supreme Court, to which the case was referred from Luxembourg.

 

How does the International MEDEL Association, of which you are a member of the management board, assess what is happening today in the Polish justice system?

 

The judges and prosecutors operating within MEDEL are horrified. All the more so because, for many years, we have been perceived as a country with a well-functioning justice system. Regardless of the weaknesses which, after all, also existed before 2015, our colleagues from Romania and Bulgaria looked on us as a role model. They are concerned that, since the authorities have demolished the system in Poland, it could happen all the more so in their countries. The representatives of the so-called old democracies are also concerned, because legal populism is unfortunately thriving throughout Europe. However, the tragic events in Poland have also had good consequences: never before have Europe’s judges been so unified and united. The best evidence of this was the March of a Thousand Togas in January 2020, in which judges from over 20 European countries took part.



Author


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


More

Published

May 30, 2022

Tags

Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaldisciplinary proceedingsPolandZbigniew Ziobrorule of lawEuropean CommissionjudgesCourt of Justice of the EUNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceEuropean UnionCourt of JusticeAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaIgor TuleyaEuropean Court of Human Rightsdisciplinary systemMateusz MorawieckiCommissioner for Human RightsCJEUMinister of JusticeJarosław KaczyńskiWaldemar Żurekdemocracymuzzle lawpresidential electionsPiotr SchabjudiciaryAdam Bodnarpreliminary rulingsK 3/21Hungaryelections 2020Kamil Zaradkiewiczdisciplinary commissionerBeata MorawiecPrzemysław RadzikFirst President of the Supreme CourtprosecutorsMichał LasotaEuropean Arrest WarrantMaciej NawackiPrime MinisterJulia Przyłębskamedia freedomProsecutor GeneralConstitutionCOVID-19electionsNational Recovery PlanNational Council for JudiciaryPresidentSupreme Administrative Courtfreedom of expressionŁukasz PiebiakCourt of Justice of the European Unioncriminal lawDagmara Pawełczyk-Woickadisciplinary liability for judgesWojciech HermelińskiMarek SafjanMałgorzata GersdorfAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPaweł JuszczyszynAnna DalkowskaNational Public Prosecutorcriminal proceedingsfreedom of assemblyStanisław BiernatExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamberconditionality mechanismconditionalityEU budgetWłodzimierz WróbelCriminal ChamberLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeNational ProsecutorStanisław PiotrowiczJarosław WyrembakAndrzej Zollacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisK 7/21May 10 2020 electionsLex DudaNational Reconstruction PlanPresident of PolandPresident of the Republic of PolandSejmXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v Polandmedia independenceIustitiaJarosław DudziczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczArticle 6 ECHRTHEMISEAWUrsula von der LeyenChamber of Professional LiabilitymediaimmunityCouncil of Europe2017policeJustice Defence Committee – KOSFreedom HouseLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaSupreme Court PresidentArticle 7Venice CommissionPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaRegional Court in KrakówRecovery FundP 7/20Justice Fundneo-judgesPiSC-791/19National Electoral CommissionAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21Piotr PszczółkowskiPegasusGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgeslex NGOcivil societyRussiaProfessional Liability ChamberJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikorasuspensionJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesReczkowicz and Others v. PolandUkraineKrystian MarkiewiczKonrad WytrykowskiJakub IwaniecZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczDariusz DrajewiczRafał PuchalskidefamationcourtsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekEwa WrzosekEU law primacyTVPLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independenceMaciej Miterademocratic backslidingViktor OrbanOLAFdecommunizationNext Generation EUvetoJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJrecommendationTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiHuman Rights CommissionerMarek MazurkiewiczCCBEAndrzej MączyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskireportBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersEuropean ParliamentOKO.pressZiobroMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskitransferPiotr GąciarekKrystyna PawłowiczMariusz MuszyńskiPiebiak gatehuman rightscorruptionEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyKrakówcoronavirusXero Flor v. PolandEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej Rutkiewiczresolution of 23 January 2020Mirosław WróblewskiCivil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaLeon Kieresright to protestSławomir JęksaPKWWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMariusz Kamińskiinfringment actionsurveillanceEU valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauENCJJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiIsraelŁukasz Radkeforeign agents lawpolexitDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościLGBT free zonesAct sanitising the judiciaryequalityMarek AstMaciej FerekChamber of Extraordinary VerificationEdyta Barańskahate crimesCourt of Appeal in Krakówhate speechPutinismcriminal codeKaczyńskiGrzęda v Polandright to fair trialPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasŻurek v PolandMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekSobczyńska and Others v Polandct on the Protection of the PopulatioparliamentlegislationRafał Trzaskowskilex Wośmedia lawRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtPrzemysła RadzikAntykastaSenateStanisław ZdunIrena BochniakKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczMarcin WarchołKatarzyna ChmuraElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiGrzegorz FurmankiewiczJacek CzaputowiczMarek JaskulskiPrzemysław CzarnekJoanna Kołodziej-Michałowiczlegislative practiceEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaENAPaweł StyrnaZbigniew BoniekKasta/AntykastaAndrzej SkowronŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoOmbudsmanMonika FrąckowiakArkadiusz CichockiKraśnikEmilia SzmydtNorwayTomasz SzmydtNorwegian fundssmear campaignNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsE-mail scandalDworczyk leaksMichał DworczykC-487/19media pluralism#RecoveryFilesArticle 10 ECHRmilestonesConstitutional Tribunal PresidentRegional Court in Amsterdamrepairing the rule of lawharassmentOpenbaar MinisterieAK judgmentBohdan BieniekSimpson judgmentMarcin KrajewskiForum Współpracy SędziówMałgorzata Dobiecka-Woźniakelectoral processChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairspublic broadcasterWiesław KozielewiczNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeGrzegorz PudaPiotr MazurekJerzy Kwaśniewskimutual trustPetros Tovmasyancourt presidentsLMelections 2023ODIHRIrelandFull-Scale Election Observation MissionNGOIrena MajcherWojciech MaczugaAmsterdamKarolina MiklaszewskaRafał LisakMałgorzata FroncJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiSebastian Mazurekthe Regional Court in WarsawElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikUnited NationsLeszek Mazurpopulisminterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s Officeintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatePechOlsztyn courtKochenovPrzemysła CzarnekEvgeni TanchevEducation MinisterFreedom in the WorldECJIpsosFrackowiakOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeretirement ageAmnesty InternationalHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr Bogdanowicztrans-Atlantic valuesPiotr BurasLSOauthoritarian equilibriumlawyersArticle 258Act of 20 December 2019clientelismoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officerepressive actPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisKoen LenaertsMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykharrassmentMarian BanaśAlina CzubieniakSupreme Audit OfficeTVNjournalistslexTVNGerard BirgfellerEwa MaciejewskaPolish mediapostal voteRzeszówborderpostal vote billprimacy