Judge Frąckowiak Fought for the Courts, Now She Has Become the President of the Court in Poznań [LIST OF NEW PRESIDENTS]

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

Justice Minister Bodnar has just appointed three new court presidents in Poznań. The local courts in Poznań and Kraków are the first in Poland where independent judges will replace Ziobro's nominees. So far, Bodnar has appointed 27 new court presidents, and we publish their list.



Justice Minister Adam Bodnar appointed Monika Frąckowiak as the president of the District Court Poznań-Nowe Miasto and Wilda on April 10, 2024.

 

Her candidacy for this position was previously selected by the Assembly of Judges of this court, which acts as a judicial self-government. She received the most votes. The Assembly also chose two other candidates, Judges Przemysław Wita and Karol Resztak, but they received fewer votes.

 

Frąckowiak replaces President Michał Tasarek, who resigned due to pressure from judges. This court also lacks vice presidents appointed by Minister Ziobro, as their terms have ended.

 

In recent years, Judge Frąckowiak has been actively involved in defending the rule of law. She is a member of the Iustitia Judges Association and vice president of the European Judges Association MEDEL. Both associations defend the independence of the judiciary. Frąckowiak was also one of the first judges in Poland to face disciplinary actions initiated by Minister Ziobro’s disciplinary officers due to her defense of the rule of law.

 

Her appointment as the president of the Poznań court signals the end of the era of Minister Ziobro’s nominees, replacing them with judges known for defending the rule of law and resisting governmental pressure.

 

Poznań Judges Call for Dismissals, Facing Potential Trouble

The appointment of Judge Frąckowiak is not the only personnel change in Poznań’s courts. Minister Bodnar’s first personnel decision in the courts was to initiate the procedure in mid-January 2024 to dismiss the president of the Court of Appeal in Poznań, neo-judge Mateusz Bartoszek (who is currently seeking a permanent promotion to the Court of Appeal through the neo-NCJ) and two vice presidents, neo-judges Przemysław Radzik and Sylwia Dembska.

 

Poznań judges demanded these dismissals, risking potential trouble. The minister had to act quickly. Subsequently, the president of the District Court in Poznań, neo-judge Daniel Jurkiewicz, and vice president Michał Inglot were dismissed. Now, the president of the District Court Poznań-Nowe Miasto and Wilda has resigned.

 

In addition to appointing Frąckowiak, Minister Bodnar also appointed a new president of the Court of Appeal in Poznań. Karol Ratajczak was selected by the Assembly of Appellate Judges.

 

On April 11, 2024, the minister appointed a new president of the District Court in Poznań. Piotr Marciniak, chosen by the Assembly of Judges, was appointed to this position.

 

Judges Demand the Dismissal of Neo-NCJ Member Jaskulski

More judges from Poznań are demanding the removal of Ziobro’s nominees. A few days ago, the Assembly of Judges of the District Court Poznań-Grunwald and Jeżyce took place. The judges expressed a vote of no confidence in the court’s leadership. Court president Tomasz Sroka (seeking promotion from the neo-NCJ to the district court) received 38 votes against continuing in his role. Twelve judges voted in favor, and four abstained.

 

Vice President Sylwester Ksiądz – Already Nominated by the Illegal NCJ to the District Court – Received No Votes in Favor

Vice President Sylwester Ksiądz, who has already been nominated by the illegal National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ) to the district court, received no votes in favor. Forty-nine votes were cast for his resignation. Another vice president, member of the illegal neo-NCJ, Marek Jaskulski (part of the so-called “hawks” faction in the neo-NCJ), also received no votes of support, with fifty-two judges voting for his resignation.

 

President Sroka and Vice President Ksiądz resigned following this vote. It is likely that the Ministry of Justice will take the Assembly’s position into account and dismiss Jaskulski from his position as vice president in the near future.

 

Potential Changes at the Poznań-Stare Miasto District Court

Poznań also has the Poznań-Stare Miasto District Court. It is possible that this court will soon undergo a personnel revolution as well.

 

Frąckowiak: I Will Open the Court to Citizens

 

We asked Judge Monika Frąckowiak about her reasons for running and her plans. Frąckowiak said, “I decided to run because I knew I had the support of the judges. I also have a vision for managing the court, and that was decisive.”

 

She added, “I believe that one should not receive the presidency just for merit. However, it is also significant that I have proven my independence. I know how to work with people and will represent the interests of the judges.”

 

What Will She Change in the Court?

Frąckowiak: “I want to open the court to the people, to make it citizen-oriented. It is important to make decisions after consulting with the judges, ensuring their opinions matter. The issue with the family division, which is also a problem in other courts, is critical. There are many cases, but a shortage of judges. Assessors cannot adjudicate here. The situation of the administrative staff is also dire.”

 

How Will She Open the Court to Citizens?

Judge Frąckowiak: “We will organize educational events, open days. I want to cooperate with schools, the education board, and organize competitions.”

 

Frąckowiak emphasized, “It is important that for the first time since the pre-war era, court presidents are being elected by the judges themselves in Assemblies. Previously, someone always appointed them, and judges could only give their opinion. The change occurring in the courts now is therefore fundamental. Now we can decide for ourselves.”

 

The idea for judges’ assemblies to select candidates for court presidents was introduced by Justice Minister Adam Bodnar. He did this without legislative changes, as the law does not prohibit him from cooperating with the judicial self-government.

 

List of New Court Presidents Appointed by Minister Bodnar

In recent days, Justice Minister Adam Bodnar has also signed nominations for new presidents in other courts. These are mainly courts where judges initiated the dismissal of Minister Ziobro’s nominees. In other courts, the terms of the previous presidents simply ended. The candidates for presidents were selected by the Assemblies of Judges. Here are the appointments:

1. President of the District Court in Koszalin: Marta Knotz from Iustitia, who has been involved in defending the rule of law, was appointed. The previous president of this court, neo-judge Piotr Boguszewski, resigned under pressure from the judges’ community. The term of the vice president, neo-judge Marta Ignaczak, had also ended. Knotz was the only candidate for the new president and received support from 88 percent of the district judges in Koszalin.

2. President of the Regional Court in Bydgoszcz: Maria Leszczyńska was appointed, replacing neo-judge Mieczysław Oliwa, whose term had ended.

3. President of the Regional Court in Kielce: Małgorzata Solecka was appointed, replacing the president, neo-judge Paweł Stępień, who was dismissed at the request of the judges.

4. President of the Regional Court in Łódź: Marta Witoszyńska was appointed, replacing the previous president whose term had ended.

5. President of the District Court in Bełchatów: Sławomir Forenc was appointed. The previous president, Rafał Sobczak, resigned under pressure from the judges’ community.

6. President of the District Court in Kozienice: Krzysztof Piaseczny was appointed.

 

Since the Beginning of His Term, Justice Minister Adam Bodnar Has Appointed the Following Court Presidents (Nominations Began in January 2024):

1. President of the Court of Appeal in Szczecin: Maciej Żelazowski
2. President of the Regional Court in Lublin: Dorota Stańczyk
3. President of the Regional Court in Piotrków Trybunalski: Urszula Sipińska-Sęk
4. President of the District Court in Legnica: Paweł Oborski
5. President of the District Court in Strzyżów: Małgorzata Pirga
6. President of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw: Dorota Markiewicz, replacing neo-judge Piotr Schab, known for prosecuting independent judges
7. President of the Regional Court in Jelenia Góra: Ryszard Sułtanowski
8. President of the District Court in Białogard: Agnieszka Bajor
9. President of the District Court in Włocławek: Romuald Jankowski
10. President of the District Court in Ostrów Mazowiecka: Joanna Raducha-Modrzejewska
11. President of the Regional Court in Słupsk: Agnieszka Niklas-Bibik, who was heavily involved in defending the rule of law and faced repressions for it
12. President of the District Court in Radom: Marek Miłosz

13. President of the District Court in Nowy Targ: Tomasz Bigoszewski
14. President of the Regional Court in Radom: Michał Gałek
15. President of the Court of Appeal in Kraków: Paweł Rygle, who has been involved in defending the rule of law
16.President of the Regional Court in Częstochowa: Jarosław Poch
17. President of the District Court in Pabianice: Adrianna Pokrywiecka
18. President of the District Court in Łask: Magdalena Socha

 

Upcoming Changes in Additional Courts

In the near future, new presidents will also be appointed to courts where Ziobro’s nominees were recently dismissed. In some of these courts, assemblies have already selected candidates for presidents. These include:

– District Court and Regional Court in Olsztyn
– Court of Appeal in Lublin
– Court of Appeal in Katowice
– District Courts and Regional Court in Kraków
– Regional Court in Ostrołęka
– Regional Court in Gliwice
– District Courts in the Kraków region
– Regional Court Warszawa-Praga
– District Courts in Biskupiec, Gliwice, Ruda Śląska, and Tarnowskie Góry

 

Who Minister Bodnar has already dismissed

Judges across Poland demand the removal of Ziobro’s nominees from the courts. Such appeals were sent to Bodnar by the judges’ associations Themis and Iustitia, as well as appellate judges from Warsaw, Poznań, Kraków, Rzeszów, Katowice, and Lublin.

 

Appeals to Bodnar were also sent by district and regional judges from Warsaw, Poznań, Kraków, Olsztyn, Elbląg, Koszalin, Gorzów Wielkopolski, Kielce, Rzeszów, Jasło, Krosno, Białystok, Ostrołęka, the District Court for Warsaw-Żoliborz, Sulęcin, employees of the District Court in Piotrków Trybunalski, and Judge Jakub Kościerzyski from the District Court in Bydgoszcz.

 

So far, Minister Bodnar has dismissed 20 presidents of courts and their deputies:
– President of the Appellate Court in Poznań, judge Mateusz Bartoszek, and vice-presidents, judge Przemysław Radzik and judge Sylwia Dembska.
– President of the Appellate Court in Kraków, judge Zygmunt Drożdżejka, and vice-president, judge Katarzyna Wysokińska-Walenciak.
– President of the Regional Court in Kielce, judge Paweł Stępień. After his dismissal, the vice-president, judge Monika Wrona, resigned herself.
– President of the Regional Court in Poznań, judge Daniel Jurkiewicz, and vice-president Michał Inglot.
– President of the Appellate Court in Warsaw, judge Piotr Schab. Initially, he did not acknowledge Bodnar’s decision, but ultimately, on March 22, 2024, he left the president’s office.

– President of the Regional Court in Olsztyn, judge Michał Lasota, and his deputies, judges Tomasz Kosakowski and Marcin Czapski.
– President of the District Court in Olsztyn, Maciej Nawacki, and his deputies, judges Tomasz Koszewski and Adam Jaroczyński.
– President of the District Court in Biskupiec, judge Tomasz Turkowski.
– President of the Regional Court in Kraków, judge Bartłomiej Migda, and his deputies: judge Michał Puza, member of the neo-National Council of the Judiciary Irena Bochniak, and judge Piotr Kowalski.
– President of the District Court for Kraków-Nowa Huta, judge Maciej Pragłowski, and vice-president of this court, judge Łukasz Felisiak.
– President of the District Court for Kraków-Podgórze, judge Marcin Cichoński.
– President of the District Court for Kraków-Śródmieście, judge Piotr Skrzyszowski.
– President of the District Court in Myślenice, judge Małgorzata Święch.
– President of the District Court in Wieliczka, Ewa Motyczyńska-Pałys.
– President of the Appellate Court in Katowice, Katarzyna Frydrych, former Deputy Minister of Justice in the PiS government.

– President of the District Court Warsaw-Praga, judge Michał Bukiewicz, and vice-president Kinga Kubuj.
– President of the District Court in Ostrołęka, Jarosław Tekliński.
– President of the District Court in Gliwice, judge Patryk Poniatowski, and vice-president judge Wojciech Głowacki. Their dismissal is a formality because the minister already has the consent of the court’s Collegium.
– President of the District Court in Gliwice, Joanna Zachorowska, and two vice-presidents of this court, judge Anna Jaworska-Wieloch (previously an assessor) and Barbara Klepacz. Their dismissal has already been approved as well.
– President of the District Court in Ruda Śląska, Ewa Żarkiewicz-Marek, and vice-president Adrian Klanka. The minister also has consent for their dismissal.

The Minister of Justice also intends to dismiss the management of the District Court in Rybnik and vice-presidents from the Appellate Court in Warsaw. Approval from the court’s Collegium is awaited in these cases.

 

Those who resigned voluntarily

Several presidents and vice-presidents of courts have voluntarily resigned. They are stepping down under pressure from the judicial community and in response to their calls for resignation. Previously, presidents and vice-presidents of 8 courts did the same. They are:

 

– President of the District Court Poznań-Nowe Miasto i Wilda, Michał Tasarek.
– President of the District Court in Koszalin, judge Piotr Boguszewski.
– Vice-president of the District Court in Elbląg, judge Anna Długajczyk.
– President of the District Court in Bełchatów, judge Robert Sobczak.
– President of the Appellate Court in Lublin, judge Jerzy Daniluk, and vice-president, judge Piotr Czerski.
– President of the District Court in Elbląg, judge Jacek Bryl, and vice-president, judge Katarzyna Jacewicz-Okuniewicz.
– Vice-president of the District Court Warsaw-Praga, Przemysław Chrzanowski.
– President of the District Court in Tarnowskie Góry, Marcin Kulikowski.

 

So far, Minister Adam Bodnar has received refusals to resign from the presidents of the district courts in Bielsko-Biała and Sosnowiec. In the former, the president is Anna Szwed-Szczygieł, who happens to be the daughter of PiS politician Stanisław Szwed. In Sosnowiec, the president is judge Ewa Łąpińska, a member of the unauthorized neo-National Council of the Judiciary.

 

The Collegiums also did not agree to the resignations of the presidents of the district courts in Bartoszyce, Kętrzyn, Miechów, Chrzanów, Olkusz, Wadowice, Sucha Beskidzka, and the vice-president from Myślenice.

 

The article was published in Polish in OKO.press on 12 April 2024.



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

April 22, 2024

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaljudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsIgor TuleyaAdam Bodnardisciplinary systemCJEUmuzzle lawJarosław Kaczyńskineo-judgesNational Recovery PlanMateusz MorawieckiCommissioner for Human RightsCourt of Justice of the European UniondemocracyNational Council for JudiciaryPrzemysław RadzikWaldemar Żurekdisciplinary commissionermedia freedomKamil Zaradkiewiczcriminal lawelectionspresidential electionsPiotr Schabelections 2023judiciaryJulia PrzyłębskaharassmentK 3/21First President of the Supreme CourtprosecutionSupreme Administrative Courtpreliminary rulingsHungaryDagmara Pawełczyk-Woickaelections 2020Michał LasotaŁukasz PiebiakNational ProsecutorBeata MorawiecPresidentProsecutor GeneralPaweł JuszczyszynRecovery FundprosecutorsRegional Court in KrakówConstitutionfreedom of expressionimmunityEuropean Arrest WarrantIustitiaMaciej NawackiPrime MinisterSejmCriminal ChamberMarek SafjanCOVID-19Venice CommissionExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberWojciech HermelińskiMałgorzata GersdorfMinistry of Justicedisciplinary liability for judgesreformMaciej FerekOSCEEU budgetcourtsStanisław Biernatcommission on Russian influenceAnna DalkowskacorruptionLGBTcriminal proceedingsStanisław PiotrowiczconditionalityJustice Fundconditionality mechanismWłodzimierz WróbelCouncil of EuropeNational Public ProsecutorPiSreformsNCJfreedom of assemblyLaw and JusticeAleksander StepkowskiJarosław DudziczKrystian MarkiewiczTHEMISLabour and Social Security ChamberPresident of the Republic of PolandPiotr GąciarekMay 10 2020 electionsOrdo IurisLex DudaPresident of Poland2017Lex Super OmniaAndrzej StępkaEwa ŁętowskaMichał WawrykiewiczArticle 6 ECHREAWUrsula von der LeyenParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeLech GarlickiTVPmediaabortionKrzysztof ParchimowiczdefamationAmsterdam District CourtStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationSLAPPXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandDidier ReyndersReczkowicz and Others v. Polandmedia independenceSenateSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramMarcin RomanowskiNext Generation EUacting first president of the Supreme CourtsuspensionPiotr PrusinowskiChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsJustice Defence Committee – KOSChamber of Professional LiabilityCivil ChamberFreedom HouseConstitutional Tribunal PresidentNational Reconstruction PlanPM Mateusz MorawieckiK 7/21Professional Liability ChamberparliamentSupreme Court PresidentNational Electoral CommissionArticle 7policeP 7/20Andrzej ZollJarosław Wyrembakelectoral codeelectoral processStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaSzymon Szynkowski vel SękKonrad WytrykowskiWojciech ŁączkowskiInternational Criminal CourtMarek MazurkiewiczAndrzej MączyńskiOLAFUkraineJanusz NiemcewiczAdam Jamrózright to fair trialEdyta BarańskaJakub IwaniecDariusz Drajewiczrestoration of the rule of lawMaciej Miterapublic mediaJózef IwulskiMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekViktor Orbanjudcial independencevetomilestonesTeresa Dębowska-Romanowskasmear campaignKazimierz DziałochaWojciech Maczugacourt presidentsRafał PuchalskiMirosław GranatMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaPaweł Filipekstate of emergencySLAPPsXero Flor v. PolandAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21transparencyDariusz ZawistowskiOKO.pressBelarusPATFoxMichał LaskowskiMaciej TaborowskiMariusz MuszyńskiKrystyna PawłowiczMarian BanaśSupreme Audit OfficeAdam SynakiewiczMarek PietruszyńskiDariusz Kornelukabuse of state resourceselections fairnessJoanna Misztal-KoneckaMirosław Wyrzykowskiinsulting religious feelingsSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczPiotr TulejaJerzy StępieńAndrzej RzeplińskiFerdynand RymarzJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoralexTuskBohdan ZdziennickiaccountabilityKrakówPegasuselections integrityMariusz KamińskisurveillanceMarek ZubikCentral Anti-Corruption Bureaucourt changesStanisław RymarrecommendationMarcin WarchołHuman Rights CommissionerLGBT ideology free zonesEwa WrzosekreportEU law primacyPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław Gowinhuman rightsFree Courtscivil societyZiobrocriminal codeZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczcoronavirusEuropean ParliamentC-791/1911 January March in WarsawEuropean Association of JudgesLaw on the NCJPiebiak gateretirement ageAdam TomczyńskiCCBEdecommunizationpublic opinion polllex NGOThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropetransferNetherlandsBelgiumintimidation of dissentersdemocratic backslidingRussiaBogdan ŚwięczkowskiGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesJerzy KwaśniewskiLIBE CommitteeWiesław KozielewiczNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeNGOGrzegorz PudaPetros TovmasyanPiotr Mazurektest of independenceCouncil of the EUStanisław ZabłockiODIHRJoanna Scheuring-WielgusNations in TransitElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikSebastian MazurekJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiMałgorzata Froncopposition2018Karolina MiklaszewskaAdam GendźwiłłDariusz DończykRafał LisakFull-Scale Election Observation MissionFrans TimmermanslegislationMarek JaskulskiJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczEwa ŁąpińskaIrena BochniakZbigniew ŁupinaPaweł StyrnaC-619/18Kasta/AntykastaGrzegorz Furmankiewiczdefamatory statementsKatarzyna Chmuralex WośPechRome StatutejudgeWorld Justice Project awardAntykastaStanisław ZdunKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczAndrzej SkowronŁukasz Bilińskipress releaseTomasz Szmydtadvocate generalrepairing the rule of lawSwieczkowskiBohdan BieniekMarcin KrajewskiUS Department of State#RecoveryFilesmedia pluralismIvan MischenkoMonika FrąckowiakArkadiusz CichockiEmilia SzmydtRights and Values ProgrammeE-mail scandalDworczyk leaksMichał DworczykMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakGeneral Court of the EUVěra JourováDonald Tuskjustice system reformAnti-SLAPP DirectiveinsultState Tribunalfundamental rightsMarcin MatczakJustice MinistryAction PlanRadosław BaszukArkadiusz RadwanLech WałęsaWałęsa v. Polandright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawpilot-judgmentDonald Tusk governmentCT Presidentcivil lawequal treatmentNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)preliminary referenceEU lawethicsChamber of Professional ResponsibilityThe Codification Committee of Civil Lawcivil partnershipsKatarzyna Kotulasame-sex unionsC‑718/21Piotr HofmańskiHelsinki Foundation for Human Rightscodification commissiondelegationsWatchdog PolskaDariusz BarskiLasotaHater ScandalpopulismNational Council for the Judiciarycivil partnerships billAleksandra RutkowskaTomasz KoszewskiNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFJustyna WydrzyńskaAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszJoanna KnobelCrimes of espionageextraordinary commissionNCR&DKaspryszyn v PolandKarol WeitzJakub KwiecińskidiscriminationAct on the Supreme Courtelectoral commissionsEuropean Court of HuKrzysztof RączkaPoznańKoan LenaertsZbigniew KapińskiAnna Głowackathe Spy ActdisinformationlustrationWhite PaperEUNational Broadcasting Councilelection fairnessDobrochna Bach-GoleckaPiotr Raczkowskilex Raczkowskigag lawsuitsCourt of Appeal in WarsawOsiatyński'a Archivetransitional justiceUS State DepartmentAssessment Actenvironmentinvestmentstrategic investmentRafał WojciechowskiKochenovPrzemysław CzarnekIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerŻurek v PolandKlubrádióGrzęda v PolandGazeta WyborczaKESMAJacek KurskiJacek CzaputowiczElżbieta KarskaPrzemysła Radzikmedia lawRafał Trzaskowskimedia taxadvertising taxSobczyńska and Others v Polandhate speechPollitykaBrussels IMarek PiertuszyńskiLGBT free zonesNational Prosecutor’s OfficeFirst President of the Suprme CourtOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateequalityC-157/21Rome IIArticle 2Forum shoppinghate crimesChamber of Extraordinary VerificationEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian KaletaC-156/21Wojciech Sadurskilegislative practicethe Regional Court in Warsawabortion rulingpublic broadcasterproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz Krasońmutual trustMultiannual Financial FrameworkAmsterdamUnited NationsIrena MajcherLeszek MazurIrelandinterim measuresLMautocratizationForum Współpracy SędziówGermanyCelmerArticle 10 ECHRC-487/19Norwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsNorwegian fundsNorwayKraśnikOmbudsmanZbigniew BoniekRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActSimpson judgmentAK judgmentENAAlina CzubieniakAct of 20 December 2019Jacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitMinistry of FinanceMichał WośMirosław WróblewskiharrassmentKoen Lenaertsright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman Giertychrepressive actlawyersLSODolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandFreedom in the WorldCourt of Appeal in KrakówPutinismKaczyńskiEvgeni TanchevPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekECJMarek Asttrans-Atlantic valuesAmnesty InternationalPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAct sanitising the judiciaryFrackowiakct on the Protection of the PopulatioMaciej RutkiewiczOlsztyn courtauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258clientelismoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficeENCJPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisPiotr BurasPiotr BogdanowiczPrzemysła CzarnekEducation Ministerforeign agents lawIsraelIpsosOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiEU valuesMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykRzeszówpostal voteborderprimacyEwa MaciejewskaEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional Courtmediabezwyborupostal vote billinfringment actionPKWLeon KieresTVNjournalistslexTVNresolution of 23 January 2020Polish mediaGerard Birgfeller