Hater Scandal: Prosecutors Have 200,000 Emails. The KastaWatch Account Is Linked to Ziobro’s Ministry

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

Investigation by OKO.press and TVN24: Documents with judges’ data were taken from the Ministry of Justice, where the KastaWatch account was created to discredit judges. We have evidence of an orchestrated attack on Judge Waldemar Żurek and indications that Zbigniew Ziobro knew about it.   OKO.PRESS and TVN24 journalist Marta Gordziewicz have obtained new evidence […]



Investigation by OKO.press and TVN24: Documents with judges’ data were taken from the Ministry of Justice, where the KastaWatch account was created to discredit judges. We have evidence of an orchestrated attack on Judge Waldemar Żurek and indications that Zbigniew Ziobro knew about it.

 

OKO.PRESS and TVN24 journalist Marta Gordziewicz have obtained new evidence confirming the hater scandal**, revealing previously unknown aspects of this shocking affair that involved discrediting independent judges from 2018-2019 who defended the rule of law under PiS rule.

 

Details of our findings are published simultaneously on OKO.press and TVN24. On Monday, June 3, 2024, at 8:30 PM, TVN24’s “Czarno na białym” will air Marta Gordziewicz’s report.

 

We have found that the prosecutor’s office has strong evidence to press criminal charges against those involved in the hater scandal. This includes not only Emilia Szmydt aka “Little Emi,” who spread hate against judges and later exposed the scandal as a whistleblower and paradoxically is the only one currently facing charges.

 

The prosecutor’s office also has material to charge judges associated with Ziobro’s ministry.
Our information indicates that prosecutors have several hundred thousand different messages previously secured from email accounts, computers, and judges’ phones, including around 200,000 emails, mostly from the private account of former Deputy Justice Minister Łukasz Piebiak, who was a key figure in the scandal and referred to as “Chief” by associated judges.

 

Emails also contained sensitive data on independent judges. Piebiak was a central figure in the hater scandal, with judges associated with him addressing him as “Chief”.

 

Emails of “Little Emi”, Judge Arkadiusz Cichocki from Gliwice, former neo-judge of the illegal Disciplinary Chamber Konrad Wytrykowski (now retired and receiving a high pension), Deputy Disciplinary Spokesman Przemysław Radzik, neo-KRS member Rafał Puchalski, and Warsaw judge Jakub Iwaniec were also secured.

 

**A shocking new revelation is that the hater profile KastaWatch on Twitter (now platform X), used to attack independent judges, was created in the Ministry of Justice in November 2018 from a computer with an IP address assigned to the Ministry.** The prosecutor’s office is determining who was behind the account.

 

This account played a significant role in spreading hate against independent judges. It was created when “Little Emi” withdrew and later exposed the entire operation. Documents from the so-called “green folders” (judges’ personal files at the ministry) were posted on KastaWatch. Metadata of photos show these documents were photographed in a park near the ministry, possibly Ujazdowski Park.

 

Access to these green folders is limited. Our information suggests that former Deputy Justice Minister Łukasz Piebiak had the most frequent access to them.

 

How Radzik Passed Information to Piebiak About Żurek’s Cases

 

According to information obtained by OKO.press and TVN24, details from disciplinary proceedings against judges were intended for media attacks. This includes disciplinary cases against Judge Waldemar Żurek from the District Court in Krakow, who has been critical of PiS’s judicial reforms since they came to power.

 

As a spokesman for the old, legal KRS (dissolved by PiS at the beginning of 2018), Żurek became one of the top enemies of PiS in the judiciary and the most persecuted judge in Poland for defending the judiciary.

 

According to OKO.press and TVN24, Deputy Disciplinary Spokesman Przemysław Radzik sent Deputy Justice Minister Łukasz Piebiak information about Żurek’s cases for media use. These communications included the private email of Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro, raising questions about his awareness of the smear campaign against judges, which he has previously denied.

 

We obtained messages exchanged about Judge Żurek. On July 5, 2019, at 3:25 PM, Radzik sent a private email to Piebiak with an attachment “Żurek’s Charges”, a draft decision from the same day regarding disciplinary proceedings against Żurek for an interview with Prawo.pl. Żurek was accused of undermining the status and criticizing neo-Supreme Court judge Kamil Zaradkiewicz.

 

On July 8, 2019, the second Deputy Disciplinary Spokesman Michał Lasota sent an email from his official account to Radzik’s official account detailing cases for potential disciplinary actions against Żurek, titled “Knur” (a derogatory term used for Żurek).

 

Lasota listed:

– Żurek’s allowances as a KRS member while working in the Krakow District Court.
– Alleged threats against former Vice-President of the Krakow District Court Mieczysław Potejko.
– Sale of an old tractor, investigated by CBA for tax compliance.
– Refusal to adjudicate in a new civil division to which he was forcibly transferred by President Pawełczyk-Woicka in 2018.
– Critical media statements about Ziobro’s reforms and meetings with citizens considered political.

Planning Media Attacks on Żurek

 

 

Radzik sent Lasota’s information about Żurek’s cases to his private email and immediately forwarded it to Piebiak with an attachment detailing Żurek’s cases. Radzik’s email was titled “Żumomin” and included derogatory comments about Żurek.

 

Piebiak forwarded Radzik’s email to Ziobro’s private email four minutes later. This suggests that Ziobro was informed about the attacks on Żurek.

 

In late July 2019, Piebiak emailed Piotr Bugajski, a media advisor for Ziobro’s ministry, asking if any progress was made. Piebiak suggested “heating up the media on Żurek” because of his escalating threats against judges on their side.

 

Bugajski replied on July 25, 2019, that they needed more information to avoid portraying Żurek as a martyr and suggested focusing on alleged unjustified allowances and unpaid tractor tax.

 

Background of the Hater Scandal

 

The hater scandal broke in August 2019, shortly after the media strategy against Żurek was devised. It was exposed by journalist Magda Gałczyńska from Onet, revealing how Emilia Szmydt, as “Little Emi,” spread hate against judges defending the rule of law.

 

“Little Emi” had access to sensitive information about judges through her husband Tomasz Szmydt, a judge in the Warsaw Administrative Court who worked in the Ministry of Justice and later in the neo-KRS. Tomasz Szmydt recently fled to Belarus and is wanted by Polish prosecutors.

 

“Little Emi” was in contact with Deputy Justice Minister Łukasz Piebiak, Judge Arkadiusz Cichocki from Gliwice, and Warsaw judge Jakub Iwaniec. She also had contact with other judges collaborating with Ziobro’s ministry, including Konrad Wytrykowski, Michał Lasota, Przemysław Radzik, and neo-KRS members Rafał Puchalski and Maciej Mitera.

 

In the second half of 2018, “Little Emi” had a falling out with her husband and Cichocki, leading her to distance herself from judges around Piebiak. In 2019, she decided to expose the entire operation and became a whistleblower.

 

After Onet’s exposé, Piebiak lost his position in Ziobro’s ministry, and judges involved in the scandal returned to their courts.

 

In April 2022, OKO.press and Onet revealed more details of the scandal, confirmed by Judges Arkadiusz Cichocki and Tomasz Szmydt. They testified in Parliament’s special committee, formed by the then-opposition.

 

Prosecutors’ Investigation of the Hater Scandal

 

Currently, there are two ongoing investigations into the hater scandal. The first began at the Warsaw District Prosecutor’s Office, later moved to the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Lublin, and since 2021, is with the Świdnica District Prosecutor’s Office.

 

No charges were filed during PiS’s rule. Only in December 2023, after a change in power in Poland, were criminal charges prepared for “Little Emi” in Świdnica, but not announced as she had moved to the UK post-divorce.

 

In March 2024, the investigation was taken over by the Wrocław Regional Prosecutor’s Office, after a leadership change at the National Prosecutor’s Office, removing Ziobro’s trusted Dariusz Barski.

 

A three-member investigative team is currently handling the case, with approximately 50 judges identified as victims of the hater scandal. The prosecutor’s office is also investigating why no charges were filed earlier despite strong evidence.

 

The second investigation is at the Kielce-East District Prosecutor’s Office, initiated by Judge Waldemar Żurek, who was also targeted by “Little Emi” and two hater accounts on Twitter, FigoFago and Jacob. The case was dismissed in October 2021, but the Katowice court ordered a reopening in March 2023.

 

Current Status of Involved Parties

 

Former Deputy Justice Minister Łukasz Piebiak is now an ordinary judge in the Warsaw District Court and is involved with the Lawyers for Poland association, posing as a defender of the rule of law.

 

Przemysław Radzik and Michał Lasota remain deputy disciplinary spokesmen. In 2024, Minister Bodnar removed Lasota as president of the Olsztyn District Court and Radzik as vice-president of the Poznań Court of Appeal. Both received high promotions from neo-KRS as appellate judges in Warsaw.

 

Jakub Iwaniec is an ordinary judge in the Warsaw-Mokotów District Court and a deputy disciplinary spokesman at the Warsaw District Court.

 

Rafał Puchalski, who assisted “Little Emi” in drafting the smear campaign against Iustitia’s president, remains a neo-KRS member and president of the Rzeszów Court of Appeal. Neo-KRS nominated him as a neo-judge of the Rzeszów Court of Appeal.

 



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

June 6, 2024

Tags

Supreme CourtPolandConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary Chamberjudgesrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaCourt of JusticeMinister of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsAdam BodnarIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemneo-judgesmuzzle lawCJEUJarosław KaczyńskiNational Recovery PlanMateusz MorawieckiCommissioner for Human RightsWaldemar ŻurekCourt of Justice of the European UnionNational Council for JudiciaryPrzemysław RadzikdemocracyPiotr Schabjudiciarypresidential electionselectionscriminal lawKamil Zaradkiewiczelections 2023disciplinary commissionermedia freedomJulia PrzyłębskaK 3/21First President of the Supreme Courtelections 2020harassmentSupreme Administrative Courtpreliminary rulingsDagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaprosecutionHungaryMichał LasotaprosecutorsBeata MorawiecRecovery FundPresidentProsecutor GeneralPaweł JuszczyszynNational ProsecutorŁukasz PiebiakConstitutionEuropean Arrest WarrantPrime Ministerfreedom of expressionMaciej NawackiCOVID-19Marek SafjanVenice CommissionSejmimmunityCriminal ChamberRegional Court in KrakówIustitiaMaciej FerekMałgorzata GersdorfreformMinistry of JusticeNCJExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberOSCEcourtsWojciech Hermelińskidisciplinary liability for judgesEU budgetcorruptionStanisław PiotrowiczNational Public Prosecutorcriminal proceedingsCouncil of EuropeAnna DalkowskaLGBTJustice FundPresident of the Republic of PolandWłodzimierz Wróbelconditionality mechanismTHEMISKrystian MarkiewiczAleksander StepkowskiStanisław BiernatPiSreformsLaw and Justicecommission on Russian influenceLabour and Social Security ChamberJarosław Dudziczconditionalityfreedom of assemblyPresident of PolandChamber of Professional LiabilityOrdo Iurismedia independenceDidier ReyndersReczkowicz and Others v. PolandSLAPPStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationBroda and Bojara v PolandXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsSupreme Court PresidentMarcin Romanowskielectoral codeAndrzej StępkaArticle 7Piotr PrusinowskiSenateSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeTVPmediaLech GarlickiLex Super OmniapoliceabortionNext Generation EUUrsula von der LeyenEAWJustice Defence Committee – KOSAmsterdam District CourtdefamationKrzysztof ParchimowiczFreedom HouseMichał WawrykiewiczEwa ŁętowskaArticle 6 ECHRMay 10 2020 elections2017Piotr GąciarekPegasussuspensionP 7/20acting first president of the Supreme CourtNational Electoral CommissionK 7/21PM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej ZollJarosław WyrembakLex DudaProfessional Liability ChamberCivil Chamberparliamentcivil societyNational Reconstruction PlanConstitutional Tribunal PresidentAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraKrakówBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaStanisław RymarMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaJanusz NiemcewiczAndrzej MączyńskiMarek MazurkiewiczAdam Synakiewiczstate of emergencyWojciech ŁączkowskiEdyta BarańskaMirosław GranatKazimierz DziałochaJoanna Misztal-Koneckajudcial independenceMaciej MiteraDariusz KornelukViktor OrbanOLAFrestoration of the rule of lawvetoMariusz KamińskisurveillanceK 6/21Józef IwulskiAstradsson v IcelandCentral Anti-Corruption BureauPATFoxSLAPPsTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaaccountabilityUkraineKrystyna PawłowiczRafał PuchalskitransparencyDariusz ZawistowskiOKO.pressright to fair trialDariusz DrajewiczPaweł FilipekMaciej Taborowskismear campaigninsulting religious feelingsNational Prosecutor’s OfficeMariusz MuszyńskiBelaruselectoral processcourt presidentsMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekmilestonesWojciech MaczugaMichał LaskowskiMarian BanaśJakub IwaniecSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczPiotr TulejaJerzy Stępieńelections fairnessAndrzej RzeplińskiSzymon Szynkowski vel SękFerdynand RymarzInternational Criminal CourtMarek PietruszyńskiMirosław WyrzykowskiBohdan ZdziennickiXero Flor v. Polandpublic mediaSupreme Audit OfficelexTuskcourt changeselections integrityMarek ZubikKonrad Wytrykowskiabuse of state resourcesGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesEuropean ParliamentZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczMarcin Warchoł11 January March in WarsawEuropean Association of JudgesZiobroFree CourtsdecommunizationEwa WrzosekEU law primacyhuman rightsPiebiak gaterecommendationreportLaw on the NCJlex NGORussiaCCBEpublic opinion pollHuman Rights CommissionerJarosław GowinPiotr PszczółkowskiLGBT ideology free zonesC-791/19coronaviruscriminal coderetirement ageNetherlandsAdam Tomczyńskidemocratic backslidingintimidation of dissentersThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeBogdan ŚwięczkowskitransferBelgiumJoanna Scheuring-WielgusNations in TransitCouncil of the EUElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikKatarzyna ChmuraSebastian MazurekJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiLIBE Committeedefamatory statementsMałgorzata FroncRafał LisakKarolina MiklaszewskaNGOKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczIrena BochniakoppositionEuropean Court of Huelectoral commissionsAct on the Supreme CourtdiscriminationJakub KwiecińskiWorld Justice Project awardTomasz Koszewskitest of independenceDariusz DończykGrzegorz FurmankiewiczAntykastaStanisław ZdunAdam Gendźwiłł2018Wojciech SadurskiFull-Scale Election Observation MissionODIHRMarek Jaskulskirepairing the rule of lawadvocate generalpress release#RecoveryFilesmedia pluralismMichał DworczykDworczyk leaksE-mail scandalAndrzej SkowronRights and Values ProgrammeTomasz SzmydtŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoMonika FrąckowiakEmilia SzmydtSwieczkowskiKasta/AntykastaBohdan BieniekStanisław ZabłockiJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekGrzegorz PudaNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeWiesław KozielewiczFrans TimmermansMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakUS Department of StateMarcin KrajewskiEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaPaweł StyrnaC-619/18Arkadiusz CichockiCT PresidentMarcin Matczakequal treatmentNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)codification commissiondelegationsWatchdog PolskaDariusz BarskiLasotafundamental rightsState Tribunalinsultcivil lawRadosław BaszukAction PlanJustice MinistryVěra JourováDonald Tuskjustice system reformAnti-SLAPP DirectiveHater ScandalpopulismNational Council for the Judiciarycivil partnerships billKRSJudicial Reformsmigration strategyPenal CodeLGBTQ+NIKProfetosame-sex unionsKatarzyna Kotulacivil partnershipsHelsinki Foundation for Human RightsPiotr HofmańskiC‑718/21preliminary referenceEU lawethicsChamber of Professional ResponsibilityThe Codification Committee of Civil LawInvestigationPoznańKrzysztof Rączkaextraordinary commissionZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaCourt of Appeal in WarsawOsiatyński'a Archivetransitional justiceUS State DepartmentAssessment ActCrimes of espionageJoanna KnobelAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszKoan LenaertsKarol WeitzKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiRThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFJustyna Wydrzyńskaenvironmentinvestmentstrategic investmentRafał WojciechowskiAleksandra RutkowskaGeneral Court of the EUArkadiusz RadwanLech WałęsaWałęsa v. Polandright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawpilot-judgmentDobrochna Bach-Goleckaelection fairnessNational Broadcasting Councilgag lawsuitslex RaczkowskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActdisinformationlustrationWhite PaperEUDonald Tusk governmentjudgePrzemysław CzarnekJózsef SzájerRafał TrzaskowskiKlubrádióSobczyńska and Others v PolandŻurek v PolandGazeta WyborczaGrzęda v PolandPollitykaJelenmedia lawIndex.huJacek CzaputowiczElżbieta KarskaPrzemysła Radzikmedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMABrussels IRome IILGBT free zonesFirst President of the Suprme CourtBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeOlsztyn courtPrzemysła CzarnekequalityMarek PiertuszyńskiChamber of Extraordinary VerificationArticle 2Forum shoppinghate speechEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian Kaletahate crimesC-156/21C-157/21Education Ministerthe Regional Court in Warsawproteststhe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońGermanyCelmermutual trustabortion rulingLMUnited NationsLeszek MazurAmsterdamIrena Majcherinterim measuresIrelandautocratizationMultiannual Financial FrameworkC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUC-487/19Norwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsNorwegian fundsNorwayKraśnikOmbudsmanZbigniew BoniekENAArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service Actpublic broadcasterForum Współpracy SędziówSimpson judgmentAK judgmentlegislative practiceforeign agents lawrepressive actMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitLSOtrans-Atlantic valuesDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandAmnesty InternationalThe First President of the Supreme CourtErnest BejdaJacek Sasinright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychAct of 20 December 2019Michał WośMinistry of FinancelawyersFrackowiakPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikKochenovPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasMałgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderekct on the Protection of the PopulatioPechlegislationlex WośKaczyńskiPutinismCourt of Appeal in KrakówMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAct sanitising the judiciaryECJMarek AstFreedom in the WorldEvgeni TanchevRome StatuteIsraelEuropean Public Prosecutor's OfficeEU valuesPolish National FoundationLux Veritatisinfringment actionMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykPKWENCJoligarchic systemclientelismIpsosOlimpia Barańska-MałuszeHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr Burasauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258Leon Kieresresolution of 23 January 2020Telex.huEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtAlina CzubieniakMaciej RutkiewiczharrassmentMirosław WróblewskiprimacyborderGerard BirgfellerTVNjournalistslexTVNpostal vote billPolish mediapostal voteEwa MaciejewskaRzeszówKoen Lenaerts