Harassment campaign conducted against leader of independent prosecutors

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

Krzysztof Parchimowicz, head of the Lex Super Omnia association of prosecutors, is the target of over a dozen different disciplinary proceedings. This is being done to exert a chilling effect on prosecutors who are critical of changes in the justice system that are being rammed through by the governing majority in Poland.



by Mariusz Jałoszewski and Anna Wójcik

 

Silencing a courageous prosecutor

 

Krzysztof Parchimowicz is one of the most recognizable prosecutors in Poland. He did not hesitate to appear in the media and comment on changes in the courts and prosecutorial service that were rammed through in 2015 by the governing majority in the Polish parliament.

 

Parchimowicz has served many years as a prosecutor and is the head of the Lex Super Omnia association of prosecutors. His charisma and relentlessness have led to the consolidation of a group of independent prosecutors within the association. Parchimowicz is also associated with Wolna Prokuratura [Free Prosecutors], a citizen-led initiative that reports on cases of harassment against prosecutors and provides them with support.

 

It is owing to Parchimowicz’s engagement that persecuted prosecutors are being defended by ordinary citizens, lawyers, and judges. He has successfully built and maintained solidarity between members of the prosecutorial service and representatives of other legal professions along with everyday Poles. He is eloquent and a skilled organizer who has become visible in the media.

 

Conflict with the Prosecutor General

 

This has all led to Parchimowicz being turned into public enemy no. 1 by politicians from the governing majority, who are in charge of the prosecutorial service. He has already been degraded by Prosecutor General Zbigniew Ziobro and transferred to a district prosecutor’s office.

 

Background: Legislation passed by the Law and Justice governing majority has combined the offices of Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General into one.

 

These functions are performed by Zbigniew Ziobro, founder and leader of the party Solidarna Polska, a coalition partner of Law and Justice. Ziobro is a trusted associate of Law and Justice leader and de factor Polish ruler Jarosław Kaczyński. The trust Kaczyński places in Ziobro, at least officially, has not even been shaken by the recent scandal in the Ministry of Justice. Media reports have detailed how personnel of the Ministry, including one Deputy Minister, initiated and coordinated a social media smear campaign against judges who were critical of changes in the judicial system.

 

Disciplinary cases used to silence judges and prosecutors

 

At Ruleoflaw.pl, we have detailed various forms of harassment and repression directed against judges. A popular form is the instigation by disciplinary spokesmen of proceedings against judges. These proceedings can lead to the imposition of penalties, up to and including removal form the bench.

 

The same types of proceedings are being used to silence independent prosecutors.

 

Over a dozen proceedings initiated against Parchimowicz

 

On 10 September, Krzystzof Parchimowicz informed public opinion that three more proceedings had been initiated against him. At the moment these are preliminary proceedings, but they can conclude with disciplinary charges being brought. Two of the cases concern interviews Parchimowicz gave for “Trybuna” and “Newsweek” in which he criticised the prosecutorial service under Zbigniew Ziobro.

 

The third concerns allegations of failing to carry out a superior’s orders. He is alleged to have sought have a case involving medical malpractice transferred to a higher-ranking office. Under regulations issued by the Minister of Justice, such cases should as a rule be handled by regional or district prosecutorial offices. Parchimowicz, after being demoted by Prosecutor General Zbigniew Ziobro, works in a district prosecutor’s office. It would seem that Parchimowicz curried disfavour with the leadership of the appellate prosecutor’s office by bringing the case and the relevant regulations to their attention.

 

These three proceedings can be added to a long list of others presently conducted against Parchimowicz by disciplinary spokesmen.

 

He has been charged in four cases, two of which concern criticism of the prosecutorial service under Zbigniew Ziobro. Another charge relates to excessive time taken in handling cases. The trials will begin in October.

 

Dozens of pickets are to be held around the country in defence of Parchimowicz, organized by Wolna Prokuratura, who want to demonstrate the solidarity of ordinary Poles with prosecutors being subjected to harassment.

 

A criminal investigation too

 

Apart from the disciplinary cases, Parchimowicz is also the subject of an investigation by the prosecutor’s office in Białystok. The investigation is examining whether Parchimowicz and judges from the Supreme Court were not complicit in aiding the “VAT Mafia”, an international scheme for defrauding the government of tax revenue.

 

The prosecutor’s office is questioning the interpretation of the law presented in that case by Parchimowicz and Supreme Court justices.
Parchimowicz has twice been summoned as a witness, in violation of proper procedure, as he has also been charged criminally. He was supposed to incriminate himself and the Supreme Court, but Parchimowicz refused to testify.

 

Within legal circles the Białystok investigation is viewed as another instance of repression against Parchimowicz for his defence of the prosecutorial service’s independence.



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

September 18, 2019

Tags

Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaldisciplinary proceedingsPolandrule of lawZbigniew Ziobrojudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionNational Council of the JudiciaryjudgesEuropean UnionCourt of JusticeMałgorzata ManowskaAndrzej DudaIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemCommissioner for Human RightsEuropean Court of Human RightsCJEUMinister of JusticeMateusz MorawieckiJarosław Kaczyńskipresidential electionsjudiciaryAdam Bodnarpreliminary rulingsdemocracyK 3/21muzzle lawHungaryelections 2020Kamil ZaradkiewiczBeata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme CourtprosecutorsWaldemar Żurekdisciplinary commissionerEuropean Arrest WarrantProsecutor GeneralConstitutionCOVID-19Julia PrzyłębskaPresidentmedia freedomfreedom of expressionCourt of Justice of the European Unioncriminal lawMarek SafjanAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPaweł JuszczyszynNational Public ProsecutorPiotr SchabPrzemysław Radzikcriminal proceedingsPrime Ministerfreedom of assemblyStanisław BiernatExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberSupreme Administrative Courtconditionality mechanismconditionalityEU budgetCriminal ChamberLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeNational ProsecutorelectionsWojciech HermelińskiStanisław PiotrowiczAndrzej ZollMałgorzata Gersdorfacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisMay 10 2020 electionsBroda and Bojara v Polandmedia independenceAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczTHEMISMaciej NawackiEAWmediaimmunityAnna DalkowskaCouncil of Europe2017policeFreedom HouseLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaArticle 7Venice CommissionWłodzimierz WróbelPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaP 7/20Justice FundPiSC-791/19disciplinary liability for judgesNational Electoral CommissionAstradsson v IcelandPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakPegasusGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesPresident of PolandPresident of the Republic of PolandJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesSejmXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandIustitiaKrystian MarkiewiczMichał LasotaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramdefamationcourtsEwa WrzosekEU law primacyTVPLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independencedemocratic backslidingViktor OrbanOLAFdecommunizationNext Generation EUvetoJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJJustice Defence Committee – KOSrecommendationTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiHuman Rights CommissionerMarek MazurkiewiczCCBEAndrzej MączyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiSupreme Court PresidentJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskireportBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersEuropean ParliamentOKO.pressZiobroMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskiPiotr Gąciarekhuman rightscorruptionEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyneo-judgescoronavirusXero Flor v. PolandEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej Rutkiewiczresolution of 23 January 2020K 6/21Mirosław WróblewskiCivil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaLeon Kieresright to protestSławomir JęksaPKWWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMariusz Kamińskiinfringment actionsurveillanceEU valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauENCJJacek SasinErnest Bejdalex NGOThe First President of the Supreme Courtcivil societyMaciej CzajkaRussiaMariusz JałoszewskiIsraelŁukasz Radkeforeign agents lawpolexitNational Recovery PlanK 7/21Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechcriminal codeGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsC-487/19Article 6 ECHRArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieUrsula von der LeyenAK judgmentSimpson judgmentForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsLeszek MazurMaciej Miterapopulisminterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s Officeintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatetransferPechOlsztyn courtKochenovPrzemysła CzarnekEvgeni TanchevEducation MinisterFreedom in the WorldKrystyna PawłowiczECJIpsosFrackowiakOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeretirement ageMariusz MuszyńskiAmnesty InternationalHudocŁukasz PiebiakRegional Court in KrakówPiebiak gateKonrad SzymańskiPiotr Bogdanowicztrans-Atlantic valuesPiotr BurasLSOauthoritarian equilibriumlawyersArticle 258Act of 20 December 2019clientelismoligarchic systemRecovery FundEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officerepressive actPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisKoen LenaertsMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykharrassmentMarian BanaśAlina CzubieniakSupreme Audit OfficeTVNjournalistslexTVNGerard BirgfellerEwa MaciejewskaPolish mediapostal voteKrakówRzeszówDagmara Pawełczyk-Woickaborderpostal vote billprimacy