“Boorish rabble!”: Kaczyński insulted the opposition parties in the Sejm

Share

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland

More

Kaczyński's outburst of 4 June 2020 has a political dimension and may be harmful to President Duda’s campaign



By Michał Danielewski

 

It was supposed to be a ritual debate on a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Health, Łukasz Szumowski. Ritual, because PiS has the majority so it can reject the motion. It was only voting that was left when the PiS chairman, Jarosław Kaczyński, started to insult the opposition MPs.

 

It seemed as if all the parliamentary emotions on 4 June 2020 were exhausted by the afternoon debate on the vote of confidence for Mateusz Morawiecki’s government. The motion for the vote suddenly submitted by the prime minister actually became an election rally for Andrzej Duda: the head of the government praised the president and rebuked the opposition from the rostrum, accusing it of “provoking”, “inciting” and “stirring”.

 

However, the head of Law and Justice, Jarosław Kaczyński, gave a new dose of emotions just before midnight, simultaneously correcting the prime minister’s words, deciding to present what “peace at the top”, which is PiS’ latest idea for Andrzej Duda’s election campaign, is supposed to be, based on his own example. Kaczyński called the opposition a “rabble”.

 

Opposition MP Barbara Nowacka (Koalicja Obywatelska – KO), clearly moved by Chairman Kaczyński’s words, responded. And she started: “I have heard about how the chairman is better several times, when he entered that cemetery which I couldn’t enter.” Nowacka’s mother MP Izabela Jaruga-Nowacka was one of the victims of  airplane crash in Smoleńsk in 2010. Then President of Poland Lech Kaczyński and his wife Maria were also among the victims.

 

Nowacka alluded to a much publicized visit of Jarosław Kaczyński to Powązki Cementery in Warsaw on the crash’s 10th anniversary on 10 April 2020, when cemeteries in Poland were closed due to COVID-19-motivated restrictions on public gatherings.

 

 

Nowacka: “I have the impression that Chairman Kaczyński called us a rabble”

 

The motion for the vote of no confidence against Szumowski was filed by the members of the Civic Coalition (Koalicja Obywatelska – KO). The allegations against the minister apply to unclear situations described by the media at the point where the ministry of health and a businessman acquainted with the minister meet (this applies to an order for protective masks work several million zlotys, which did not meet the safety standards), as well as multi-million zloty grants from the Scientific Centre for Research and Development (NCBiR) for the research company run by Szumowski’s brother, which were awarded to him, among others, at a time when Szumowski was the deputy minister of science to whom the NCBiR reports.

 

Speaking in his own defence, Szumowski stated that the opposition is taking advantage of media that is producing fake news about him. He mentioned four media: TVN, Wyborcza, Newsweek and OKO.press.

 

KO’s motion was being justified by MP Barbara Nowacka. When she started to speak, the head of the Civic Platform (Platforma Obywatelska – PO) party, Borys Budka, drew the attention of the Deputy Speaker of the Sejm, Ryszard Terlecki, to the behaviour of the PiS deputies: Nowacka was speaking, while Jarosław Kaczyński and the deputy prime minister and the minister of culture, Piotr Gliński, were standing with their backs towards her and were talking in the government benches. When Terlecki did not react, Budka went up to the podium and called on Kaczyński and Gliński to sit down and listen. “This is not your own property, Mr. Chairman,” he called out while he was returning to his seat.

 

Gliński aggressively replied to Budka that the vote of no confidence was “pure audacity and scandalous.” Terlecki did not react, he focused all his attention on Budka, ordering him to take his seat.

 

Confusion arose in the parliamentary room. However, the tension was already subsiding when Jarosław Kaczyński shouted to the opposition deputies from behind the government benches:

 

“There has never been such a boorish rabble in this Sejm!”

 

Gliński tried to cover up or even stop Kaczyński, but the words reached the opposition MPs. Voices were raised: “What is this supposed to be?” “He should apologise.” Terlecki did not react. He was still only addressing the opposition MPs.

 

“Please stop causing a row and sit still” – repeated Terlecki.

 

“Mr. Speaker, I have the impression that MP Kaczyński just called us a rabble”, said Nowacka sententially.

 

Nowacka: How dare he insult me

 

Deputy Marshal Terlecki ordered a five-minute break. When the session resumed, Barbara Nowacka again entered the podium, still clearly moved by Kaczyński’s words. However, she demonstrated a political reflection by positioning Kaczyński’s outburst of contempt in a broader context:

 

“Mr. Speaker, I have heard about how the chairman is better several times, when he entered that cemetery which I couldn’t enter because then his pain was greater than mine.”

 

At the same cemetery where my mother, a victim of the Smolensk disaster, is buried. But he went in, laid flowers for his mother and his brother, while others could not. And now, today, he dares to insult me!

 

We can see, once again, what PiS is. A new solidarity is developing among the people, those who supported the sick, those who sewed masks, and PiS once again showed us its cash cow change.

 

The arrogance we saw here in the hall, corruption, nepotism, these are your names, the new elite from PiS!”

 

At this point, Terlecki switched off Nowacka’s microphone.

 

Kaczyński’s relapse

 

This is not the first time that Jarosław Kaczyński was abusive to the opposition.

 

A similar episode took place on 18 July 2017 at 23:47, at a time when tens of thousands of Poles were protesting in the streets against the authority’s attack on the Supreme Court. The PiS leader shouted 30 words from the parliamentary rostrum.

 

“I’m sorry, Mr. Speaker, this is without a procedure. I know you’re afraid of the truth, but don’t wipe your treacherous mugs with the memory of my brother. You destroyed him, you murdered him, you are scoundrels.”

 

Jarosław Kaczyński also once attacked Agnieszka Pomaska from the PO party. During the blockade of the parliamentary rostrum by the opposition on 16 December 2016, he shouted to her “Go to hell”, and several hours later, he took her mobile phone and threw it on the ground.

 

This may hurt Duda

 

Kaczyński’s outburst of 4 June 2020 has a political dimension and may be harmful to President Duda’s campaign.

 

In the light of the weakening support for Andrzej Duda, the Law and Justice party has placed all its money on one horse, building the image of the head of state as a guarantor of “peace at the top” and of silencing political emotions. PiS’ slogan says that, after Duda’s re-election, there will be harmony and, instead of arguing, the politicians will work for the good of the Poles.

 

Kaczyński’s insults of the opposition are destroying this image, because they are proving, black on white, that the leader of the camp in power has a contemptuous attitude towards the opposition – and that part of the public that objects to PiS rule. According to the PiS chairman’s idea, “peace at the top” will only be possible if the opposition does not oppose the right-wing populists ruling in Poland. In other words, when it stops being an opposition.



Author


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


More

Published

June 8, 2020

Tags

Supreme CourtConstitutional TribunalDisciplinary ChamberPolandjudgesdisciplinary proceedingsrule of lawZbigniew ZiobroNational Council of the JudiciaryCourt of Justice of the EUjudicial independenceEuropean CommissionEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaCourt of JusticeEuropean Court of Human RightsMinister of JusticeIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemAdam Bodnarmuzzle lawJarosław KaczyńskiNational Recovery PlanCJEUMateusz MorawieckiCommissioner for Human Rightsneo-judgesCourt of Justice of the European UniondemocracyPrzemysław RadzikWaldemar ŻurekNational Council for Judiciarypresidential electionselectionselections 2023disciplinary commissionercriminal lawJulia PrzyłębskaPiotr SchabKamil Zaradkiewiczmedia freedomharassmentpreliminary rulingsHungarySupreme Administrative Courtelections 2020K 3/21Dagmara Pawełczyk-WoickajudiciaryFirst President of the Supreme CourtŁukasz PiebiakprosecutorsPresidentRecovery FundBeata MorawiecPaweł JuszczyszynProsecutor GeneralMichał Lasotafreedom of expressionMaciej NawackiEuropean Arrest WarrantSejmprosecutionCOVID-19Regional Court in KrakówCriminal ChamberNational ProsecutorConstitutionPrime MinisterMinistry of JusticecourtsMałgorzata GersdorfMarek SafjanEU budgetdisciplinary liability for judgesMaciej FerekOSCEWojciech HermelińskiExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberIustitiacriminal proceedingsWłodzimierz WróbelVenice Commissionconditionality mechanismAleksander StepkowskiTHEMISLabour and Social Security ChamberStanisław BiernatPiScommission on Russian influenceStanisław PiotrowiczPresident of the Republic of PolandNCJimmunityconditionalityAnna DalkowskaJustice FundcorruptionLaw and JusticeNational Public ProsecutorCouncil of Europefreedom of assemblyKrystian MarkiewiczreformsReczkowicz and Others v. PolandKrzysztof Parchimowiczacting first president of the Supreme Court2017policeSenateAndrzej Zollmedia independenceSLAPPdefamationStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationLGBTJustice Defence Committee – KOSEwa ŁętowskaDidier ReyndersFreedom HouseAmsterdam District CourtMay 10 2020 electionsXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandOrdo IurisPresident of PolandAndrzej StępkaBroda and Bojara v PolandSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramPiotr GąciarekJarosław WyrembakPM Mateusz MorawieckiArticle 7Next Generation EUConstitutional Tribunal PresidentUrsula von der LeyenLex DudaTVPmediaLex Super OmniaProfessional Liability ChamberreformJarosław DudziczK 7/21National Reconstruction PlansuspensionparliamentChamber of Professional LiabilityEAWArticle 6 ECHRP 7/20Supreme Court PresidentLech GarlickiMichał WawrykiewiczabortionPiotr PrusinowskiNational Electoral Commissionelectoral codeJanusz NiemcewiczTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaStanisław RymarMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaKazimierz DziałochaBogdan ŚwięczkowskiNetherlandsAndrzej MączyńskiMarek MazurkiewiczvetoStefan JaworskiMirosław GranatOLAFBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaViktor OrbanJózef IwulskiMaciej MiteraSLAPPsjudcial independenceWojciech ŁączkowskiAdam JamrózPATFoxFerdynand RymarzKonrad WytrykowskiRafał Puchalskismear campaignmilestonesKrakówMarzanna Piekarska-Drążekstate of emergencyUkraineelectoral processBelaruscourt presidentsAdam SynakiewiczXero Flor v. PolandAstradsson v Icelandright to fair trialEdyta BarańskaJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraCentral Anti-Corruption BureauJakub IwaniecsurveillancePegasusDariusz DrajewiczJoanna Misztal-KoneckaCivil ChamberK 6/21Wojciech MaczugaSzymon Szynkowski vel SękDariusz ZawistowskiOKO.presselections integrityelections fairnessMarek ZubikBohdan ZdziennickiMirosław WyrzykowskiSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczPiotr TulejaJerzy StępieńAndrzej RzeplińskitransparencyMariusz KamińskiMaciej Taborowskiinsulting religious feelingsPaweł Filipekpublic mediaMariusz MuszyńskiKrystyna PawłowiczlexTuskcourt changesMarek PietruszyńskiMichał LaskowskiSupreme Audit Officeabuse of state resourcesLaw on the NCJEuropean ParliamentJarosław GowincoronavirusRussiaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczFree Courts11 January March in WarsawCCBEPiebiak gatehuman rightsrecommendationC-791/19Human Rights CommissionerMarcin WarchołLGBT ideology free zonesreportEuropean Association of JudgesPiotr Pszczółkowskiretirement agedecommunizationGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgesintimidation of dissentersdemocratic backslidingpublic opinion pollZiobroEU law primacyMarian BanaśThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europecriminal codeBelgiumlex NGOEwa Wrzosekcivil societytransferAdam Tomczyńskimedia pluralismBohdan Bieniek#RecoveryFilesFrans TimmermansLIBE Committeerepairing the rule of lawUS Department of StateMarcin KrajewskiKarolina Miklaszewska2018NGOFull-Scale Election Observation MissionODIHRNations in TransitStanisław ZabłockiPetros TovmasyanJerzy KwaśniewskiPiotr MazurekGrzegorz PudaNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeWiesław KozielewiczChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public AffairsMałgorzata Dobiecka-WoźniakCouncil of the EURafał LisakMichał DworczykWojciech Sadurskidefamatory statementsRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtC-619/18Rights and Values Programmejudgepress releaseAntykastalex WoślegislationCourt of Appeal in KrakówPutinismKaczyńskiPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasMałgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderekct on the Protection of the PopulatioWorld Justice Project awardStanisław ZdunIrena BochniakKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoJoanna Kołodziej-MichałowiczMonika FrąckowiakArkadiusz CichockiEmilia SzmydtTomasz SzmydtE-mail scandalAndrzej SkowronKasta/AntykastaKatarzyna Chmuraadvocate generalGrzegorz FurmankiewiczMarek JaskulskiEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaPaweł StyrnaSwieczkowskiDworczyk leaksMałgorzata FroncHater ScandalAleksandra RutkowskaGeneral Court of the EUArkadiusz RadwanLech WałęsaWałęsa v. Polandright to an independent and impartial tribunal established by lawpilot-judgmentDonald Tusk governmentRafał WojciechowskiDobrochna Bach-Goleckalex RaczkowskiPiotr Raczkowskithe Spy ActdisinformationCT Presidentfundamental rightsNational Broadcasting Councilelection fairnessequal treatmentcivil lawMarcin MatczakDariusz KornelukNational School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution (KSSiP)codification commissiondelegationsWatchdog PolskaDariusz BarskiLasotapopulismState TribunalRadosław BaszukAction PlanJustice MinistryVěra JourováDonald Tuskjustice system reformAnti-SLAPP Directiveinsultgag lawsuitsstrategic investmentinvestmentlustrationJakub KwiecińskidiscriminationAct on the Supreme Courtelectoral commissionsEuropean Court of HuKrzysztof RączkaPoznańTomasz Koszewskitest of independenceSebastian MazurekElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikJoanna Scheuring-WielgusoppositionThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentAdam Gendźwiłłtransitional justiceDariusz DończykKoan LenaertsKarol WeitzZbigniew KapińskiAnna GłowackaCourt of Appeal in WarsawOsiatyński'a ArchiveEUUS State DepartmentAssessment Actenvironmentextraordinary commissionWhite PaperKaspryszyn v PolandNCR&DNCBiREuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFJustyna WydrzyńskaAgnieszka Brygidyr-DoroszJoanna KnobelCrimes of espionageJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiMarek Piertuszyńskihate speechhate crimesmedia taxadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandPrzemysław CzarnekJacek CzaputowiczMarcin RomanowskiElżbieta KarskaPrzemysła Radzikmedia lawRafał TrzaskowskiSobczyńska and Others v PolandTelex.huJelenForum shoppingFirst President of the Suprme CourtEuropean Economic and Social CommitteeSebastian KaletaOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeC-156/21C-157/21foreign agents lawArticle 2Rome IIJózsef SzájerChamber of Extraordinary VerificationKlubrádióequalityGazeta WyborczaLGBT free zonesPollitykaBrussels Ilegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekAK judgmentautocratizationMultiannual Financial FrameworkOpenbaar MinisterieRegional Court in Amsterdamabortion rulingArticle 10 ECHRprotestsinterim measuresLeszek MazurIrena MajcherAmsterdamLMmutual trustthe Regional Court in Warsawpublic broadcasterUnited NationsForum Współpracy Sędziówthe NetherlandsDenmarkact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsNorwegian fundsNorwayKraśnikOmbudsmanKarlsruheAusl 301 AR 104/19SwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońC-487/19GermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUIrelandMarek AstLSOright to protestSławomir JęksaWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman Giertychtrans-Atlantic valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinancelawyersMirosław Wróblewskirepressive actborderprimacyEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej RutkiewiczAct of 20 December 2019Amnesty InternationalJacek SasinEvgeni TanchevKochenovPechPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościAct sanitising the judiciaryFreedom in the WorldECJErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiŁukasz RadkepolexitFrackowiakDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandRzeszówKoen LenaertsharrassmentOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeinfringment actionHudocPKWKonrad SzymańskiPiotr BogdanowiczPiotr BurasLeon KieresIpsosEU valuesNational Prosecutor’s OfficeBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberTribunal of StateOlsztyn courtPrzemysła CzarnekEducation MinisterENCJauthoritarian equilibriumArticle 258postal voteTVNjournalistslexTVNEwa MaciejewskaGerard BirgfellerPolish mediaAlina CzubieniakSimpson judgmentpostal vote billclientelismoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officeresolution of 23 January 2020Polish National FoundationLux VeritatisMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykIsrael