ABA: In Poland, Erosion of Judicial Independence Continues


Lawyer and advocacy officer at Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights in Warsaw


The American Bar Association (ABA), one of the world's largest voluntary professional organizations with over 400,000 members, is monitoring the independence of the judiciary in Poland. On July 8-9, 2019, the ABA President Bob Carlson visited Warsaw to meet with lawyers, judges and prosecutors as well as civil society to engage in discussion on the rule of law in Poland and threats to judicial independence.

This the second visit of ABA representatives in Poland. Last year during her visit to Poland, the former ABA president Hillary Bass expressed her concerns “regarding the potential undermining of the rule of law in Poland”.


Recently, the ABA prepared an update on the situation in Poland, which we present below.


Poland: Erosion of Judicial Independence Continues


Nearly a year since the American Bar Association (ABA) began monitoring legislative changes to the judiciary in Poland, the government has pressed ahead with dismantling the independence of the judiciary and consolidated its own power. These measures have elicited an unprecedented response from (and undermined its standing within) the European Union. The ABA Center for Human Rights continues to monitor these troubling developments and to provide support to human rights defenders seeking to restore and preserve judicial independence in Poland.


The trouble began when in 2015 when the Law and Justice Party gained majority control of the Polish legislature and presidency. Under the guise of addressing corruption, the government enacted multiple laws that brought the power of the judiciary under political control. These laws lowered the retirement age for the Supreme Court from 70 to 65 and gave the Minister of Justice control in selecting Supreme Court Justices, resulting in the forced retirement of approximately one-third of the Supreme Court, with the Law and Justice Party newly authorized to fill those positions with whomever they choose.


In response, the EU took the unprecedented step of invoking Article 7 of the EU charter, which consists of an escalating series of political sanctions levied against member countries “considered at risk of breaching the bloc’s core values.” The EU initiated Article 7 sanctions in December 2017 for Poland’s “sustained attack on the law itself” in which “the executive and legislative branches have been systematically enabled to politically interfere in the composition, powers, administration and functioning of the judicial branch.”


Meanwhile the ABA Center for Human Rights, through its Justice Defenders Program, worked in conjunction with other ABA entities to denounce the government’s judicial reforms.  ABA President Linda A. Klein first criticized the reforms  in July 2017.  Her successor, President Hilarie Bass, issued a follow-up statement and led a delegation of lawyers to monitor the situation that December. Further, the Center’s Chief Counsel, Brittany Benowitz, wrote an opinion piece on the negative implications of compromising judicial independence, and President Bass penned another piece arguing for US opposition to the reforms. Most recently, current ABA President Bob Carlson has urged Poland to respect the rule of law and put a hold on appointing new judges.


[This text was orginally published at the ABA wbestite. We would like to thank the ABA for the opportunity to reprint this article.]


Lawyer and advocacy officer at Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights in Warsaw



July 10, 2019


Supreme Courtrule of lawdisciplinary proceedingsEuropean CommissionDisciplinary ChamberNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceCourt of JusticeConstitutional TribunaljudgesAndrzej DudaPolandEuropean UniondemocracyZbigniew Ziobropresidential electionsjudiciaryFirst President of the Supreme Courtpreliminary rulingsCJEUMinister of Justiceelections 2020Court of Justice of the EUIgor TuleyaCOVID-19PresidentProsecutor GeneralprosecutorsLaw and Justicemuzzle lawJarosław Kaczyńskiacting first president of the Supreme CourtMay 10 2020 elections2017Freedom HouseExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberVenice CommissionConstitutionNCJdisciplinary systemelectionsNational Electoral CommissionCommissioner for Human RightsKamil ZaradkiewiczGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesAleksander StepkowskiMałgorzata Manowskademocratic backslidingdecommunizationfreedom of assemblyJulia PrzyłębskaLaw on the NCJrecommendationAdam BodnarHuman Rights CommissionerCCBEThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropereportZiobroPM Mateusz Morawieckifreedom of expressionprosecutionEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawHungarycriminal lawNational ProsecutorcoronavirusC-791/19disciplinary liability for judgesWojciech Hermelińskiresolution of 23 January 2020Stanisław PiotrowiczPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakLeon KieresAndrzej ZollPKWMarek SafjanMałgorzata Gersdorfinfringment actionEU valuesENCJlex NGOcivil societyRussiaIsraelforeign agents lawOrdo IurisOSCEOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeEuropean Court of Human RightsFirst President of the Suprme CourtPresident of PolandPresident of the Republic of PolandJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT free zonesequalityLGBT ideology free zonespopulismMateusz MorawieckiPrime Ministerequal treatmentfundamental rightspoliceCT PresidentJustice Defence Committee – KOSEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justicepublic opinion pollSupreme Court President2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUStanisław ZabłockiArticle 7European ParliamentLIBE CommitteeFrans TimmermansUS Department of StateSwieczkowskiSupreme Administrative Courtadvocate generalpress releaseRights and Values ProgrammeconditionalityEU budgetC-619/18defamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskijudgetransferPechKochenovEvgeni TanchevFreedom in the WorldECJFrackowiakretirement ageAmnesty InternationalŁukasz PiebiakPiebiak gatehuman rightstrans-Atlantic valuesLSOlawyersAct of 20 December 2019repressive actKoen LenaertsharrassmentAlina CzubieniakMinistry of JusticeJustice FundGerard BirgfellerEwa Maciejewskapostal votepostal vote billPiS