94 Supreme Court judges appeal to the Sejm: Restore the legal NCJ and full rule of law

Share

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland

More

The legal judges of the Supreme Court, including the former presidents, are appealing to the Sejm to fully implement the judgments of the ECtHR and the CJEU and to liquidate the main source of problems with the rule of law, namely the neo-NCJ.



The statement of the 94 legal judges of the Supreme Court was submitted to the Marshal of the Sejm, Elżbieta Witek and the Marshal of the Senate, Tomasz Grodzki in connection with the start of work on Thursday 24 March on the regulations that are to liquidate the Disciplinary Chamber. Several bills are being considered – the President’s, two bills from PiS MPs (Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro is behind one of these) and the opposition’s.

 

The bills are primarily intended to implement the CJEU judgment of 15 July 2021, in which the Court ruled that the Disciplinary Chamber is not a legal court. The liquidation of the Chamber is one of the European Commission’s conditions for unblocking the billions from the National Reconstruction Plan for Poland. But neither President Duda’s bill – it appears that this has the greatest chances of being enacted, with amendments – nor the bills of the PiS MPs fully implement the judgments of the CJEU and ECtHR.

 

Because they do not eliminate the main problem affecting the rule of law, or in other words they do not include the liquidation of the neo-NCJ which gives nominations to the neo-judges.

 

Meanwhile, the legality of the neo-NCJ and its nominations were also contested by the European courts.

 

The bill which originated from the Ministry of Justice actually increases the chaos in the courts even more, because it assumes the liquidation of the current Supreme Court and the appointment of a shell court in its place staffed with selected people. 

 

Only the bill submitted by the opposition parties fully implements the judgments of the ECtHR and the CJEU and fully restores the rule of law. But the government is not supporting it.

 

Further to the bills regarding the liquidation of the Disciplinary Chamber and the problem with the neo-NCJ, as many as 94 legal judges of the Supreme Court, including retired judges, issued a statement, which was submitted to the Marshal of the Sejm and the Marshal of the Senate. The judges of the Supreme Court also declared their willingness to participate in the work on the bills in the Sejm commission. However, they did not receive a response from either the Sejm or the Senate.

 

The statement was also signed by the former presidents of the Supreme Court, Adam StrzemboszLech Gardocki and Małgorzata Gersdorf.

 

We have published the full content of the statement of the Supreme Court judges:

“Further to the draft amendments to the Act on the Supreme Court and Certain Other Acts of 8 December 2017 (Sejm Form No. 2011), the draft Act on the protection of judicial independence and special rules of criminal and disciplinary liability of judges (Sejm Form No. 2013) and the draft new Act on the Supreme Court (Sejm Paper No. 2050), which were submitted to the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, given the total omission of the judicial community from the process of their preparation and consultation, we declare the following:

  1. We note the attempts to solve the problem of the destruction of the judiciary that has been growing since 2016, including the Supreme Court, simultaneously noticing that the presented drafts do not implement the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 19 November 2019 in joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18, of 2 March 2021 in Case C824/18, of 15 July 2021 in Case C-791/19 and of 6 October 2021 in Case C-487/19. They also fail to take account of the conclusions drawn from the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Reczkowicz v Poland, Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v Poland and Advance Pharma v Poland.
  2. The presented drafts do not contain any proposals of statutory changes regarding the restoration of the National Council of the Judiciary to its constitutional functions, including the duty to safeguard the independence of the courts and the independence of judges. Therefore, we uphold our declaration that we can participate in the work intended to achieve the necessary consensus on these matters in the interest of the public, the judiciary and the citizens.It arises from these judgments of the European Courts that the main source of threats to the state of the rule of law in Poland is the formation of the judicial component of the National Council of the Judiciary on the basis of the provisions of the Act amending the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and certain other acts of 8 December 2017, which is inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, and the related status of people appointed to the office of judge on the basis of resolutions of the National Council of the Judiciary thus formed.
  3. We would like to emphasise that, especially in the current international situation caused by Russia’s aggression with respect to Ukraine, which constitutes a gross breach of the international legal order and human rights violations, legal solutions must be adopted which fully respect the principles of the rule of law and respect the values on which the functioning of the European Union is based. It should be obvious to each of us how important the respect of these values is to the unity of and cooperation between the Member States of the European Union, which constitutes a real guarantee of the protection of the interests of our country.

 

The statement was signed by:

 

Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court

Active judges

Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz

Dariusz Dończyk

Paweł Grzegorczyk

Monika Koba

Grzegorz Misiurek

Władysław Pawlak

Agnieszka Piotrowska

Marta Romańska

Krzysztof Strzelczyk

Roman Trzaskowski

Katarzyna Tyczka-Rote

Karol Weitz

Dariusz Zawistowski

Retired judges

Mirosław Bączyk

Tadeusz Ereciński

Józef Frąckowiak

Jan Górowski

Irena Gromska-Szuster

Jacek Gudowski

Wojciech Katner

Marian Kocon

Iwona Koper

Anna Kozłowska

Zbigniew Kwaśniewski

Barbara Myszka

Anna Owczarek

Henryk Pietrzkowski

Krzysztof Pietrzykowski

Marek Sychowicz

Maria Szulc

Bogumiła Ustjanicz

Lech Walentynowicz

Tadeusz Wiśniewski

Hubert Wrzeszcz

Kazimierz Zawada

Czesława Żuławska

 

Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court

Active judges

Michał Laskowski

Tomasz Artymiuk

Jacek Błaszczyk

Małgorzata Gierszon

Jerzy Grubba

Kazimierz Klugiewicz

Rafał Malarski

Jarosław Matras

Piotr Mirek

Marek Pietruszyński

Waldemar Płóciennik

Zbigniew Puszkarski

Andrzej Siuchniński

Barbara Skoczkowska

Andrzej Stępka

Dariusz Świecki

Andrzej Tomczyk

Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek

Eugeniusz Wildowicz

Paweł Wiliński

Włodzimierz Wróbel

Retired judges

Adam Strzembosz

Lech Gardocki

Stanisław Zabłocki

Wiesław Błuś

Krzysztof Cesarz

Henryk Gradzik

Przemysław Kalinowski

Andrzej Konopka

Józef Musioł

Dorota Rysińska

Roman Sądej

Jacek Sobczak

Ewa Strużyna

Józef Szewczyk

Feliks Tarnowski

Jadwiga Żywolewska-Ławniczak

 

Labour and Social Insurance Chamber of the Supreme Court

Active judges

Piotr Prusinowski

Bohdan Bieniek

Jolanta Frańczak

Katarzyna Gonera

Józef Iwulski

Halina Kiryło

Dawid Miąsik

Maciej Pacuda

Krzysztof Rączka

Romualda Spyt

Retired judges

Małgorzata Gersdorf

Jan Wasilewski

Teresa Flemming-Kulesza

Beata Gudowska

Zbigniew Hajn

Roman Kuczyński

Jerzy Kuźniar

Andrzej Wasilewski

Barbara Wagner

Małgorzata Wrębiakowska-Marzec

Andrzej Wróbel



Author


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


More

Published

March 25, 2022

Tags

Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaldisciplinary proceedingsPolandrule of lawZbigniew Ziobrojudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionNational Council of the JudiciaryjudgesEuropean UnionCourt of JusticeAndrzej DudaMałgorzata ManowskaIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemEuropean Court of Human RightsCommissioner for Human RightsCJEUMinister of JusticeMateusz MorawieckiJarosław KaczyńskiWaldemar Żurekmuzzle lawpresidential electionsjudiciaryAdam Bodnarpreliminary rulingsdemocracyK 3/21Hungaryelections 2020Kamil ZaradkiewiczBeata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme Courtprosecutorsdisciplinary commissionerEuropean Arrest WarrantProsecutor GeneralConstitutionCOVID-19Maciej NawackiPrzemysław RadzikJulia PrzyłębskaPresidentmedia freedomfreedom of expressionCourt of Justice of the European Unioncriminal lawMarek SafjanAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPaweł JuszczyszynNational Public ProsecutorPiotr Schabcriminal proceedingsPrime Ministerfreedom of assemblyStanisław BiernatExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberSupreme Administrative Courtconditionality mechanismconditionalityEU budgetWłodzimierz WróbelCriminal ChamberLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeNational Prosecutordisciplinary liability for judgeselectionsWojciech HermelińskiStanisław PiotrowiczAndrzej ZollMałgorzata Gersdorfacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisK 7/21May 10 2020 electionsLex DudaNational Council for JudiciarySejmXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v Polandmedia independenceIustitiaSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczTHEMISEAWmediaimmunityAnna DalkowskaCouncil of Europe2017policeFreedom HouseLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaSupreme Court PresidentArticle 7Venice CommissionPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaŁukasz PiebiakP 7/20Justice FundPiSC-791/19National Electoral CommissionAstradsson v IcelandK 6/21Piotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakPegasusGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgeslex NGOcivil societyRussiaNational Reconstruction PlanJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraPresident of PolandPresident of the Republic of PolandJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesReczkowicz and Others v. PolandKrystian MarkiewiczMichał LasotaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczdefamationcourtsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsArticle 6 ECHRUrsula von der LeyenEwa WrzosekEU law primacyTVPLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independencedemocratic backslidingViktor OrbanOLAFdecommunizationNext Generation EUvetoJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJJustice Defence Committee – KOSrecommendationTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiHuman Rights CommissionerMarek MazurkiewiczCCBEAndrzej MączyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskireportBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersEuropean ParliamentOKO.pressZiobroMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskiPiotr GąciarekRegional Court in KrakówPiebiak gatehuman rightscorruptionEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyneo-judgescoronavirusXero Flor v. PolandEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej Rutkiewiczresolution of 23 January 2020Mirosław WróblewskiCivil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaLeon Kieresright to protestSławomir JęksaPKWWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMariusz Kamińskiinfringment actionsurveillanceEU valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauENCJJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiIsraelŁukasz Radkeforeign agents lawpolexitNational Recovery PlanDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeProfessional Liability ChamberFirst President of the Suprme CourtsuspensionPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościLGBT free zonesAct sanitising the judiciaryequalityMarek AstMaciej FerekChamber of Extraordinary VerificationEdyta Barańskahate crimesCourt of Appeal in Krakówhate speechPutinismcriminal codeKaczyńskiGrzęda v Polandright to fair trialPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasŻurek v PolandMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekSobczyńska and Others v Polandct on the Protection of the PopulatioparliamentlegislationRafał Trzaskowskilex WośUkrainemedia lawRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtKonrad WytrykowskiJarosław DudziczPrzemysła RadzikJakub IwaniecAntykastaSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsC-487/19Article 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieAK judgmentSimpson judgmentForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsLeszek MazurMaciej Miterapopulisminterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s Officeintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatetransferPechOlsztyn courtKochenovPrzemysła CzarnekEvgeni TanchevEducation MinisterFreedom in the WorldKrystyna PawłowiczECJIpsosFrackowiakOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeretirement ageMariusz MuszyńskiAmnesty InternationalHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr Bogdanowicztrans-Atlantic valuesPiotr BurasLSOauthoritarian equilibriumlawyersArticle 258Act of 20 December 2019clientelismoligarchic systemRecovery FundEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officerepressive actPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisKoen LenaertsMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykharrassmentMarian BanaśAlina CzubieniakSupreme Audit OfficeTVNjournalistslexTVNGerard BirgfellerEwa MaciejewskaPolish mediapostal voteKrakówRzeszówDagmara Pawełczyk-Woickaborderpostal vote billprimacy