94 Supreme Court judges appeal to the Sejm: Restore the legal NCJ and full rule of law

Share

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland

More

The legal judges of the Supreme Court, including the former presidents, are appealing to the Sejm to fully implement the judgments of the ECtHR and the CJEU and to liquidate the main source of problems with the rule of law, namely the neo-NCJ.



The statement of the 94 legal judges of the Supreme Court was submitted to the Marshal of the Sejm, Elżbieta Witek and the Marshal of the Senate, Tomasz Grodzki in connection with the start of work on Thursday 24 March on the regulations that are to liquidate the Disciplinary Chamber. Several bills are being considered – the President’s, two bills from PiS MPs (Minister of Justice Zbigniew Ziobro is behind one of these) and the opposition’s.

 

The bills are primarily intended to implement the CJEU judgment of 15 July 2021, in which the Court ruled that the Disciplinary Chamber is not a legal court. The liquidation of the Chamber is one of the European Commission’s conditions for unblocking the billions from the National Reconstruction Plan for Poland. But neither President Duda’s bill – it appears that this has the greatest chances of being enacted, with amendments – nor the bills of the PiS MPs fully implement the judgments of the CJEU and ECtHR.

 

Because they do not eliminate the main problem affecting the rule of law, or in other words they do not include the liquidation of the neo-NCJ which gives nominations to the neo-judges.

 

Meanwhile, the legality of the neo-NCJ and its nominations were also contested by the European courts.

 

The bill which originated from the Ministry of Justice actually increases the chaos in the courts even more, because it assumes the liquidation of the current Supreme Court and the appointment of a shell court in its place staffed with selected people. 

 

Only the bill submitted by the opposition parties fully implements the judgments of the ECtHR and the CJEU and fully restores the rule of law. But the government is not supporting it.

 

Further to the bills regarding the liquidation of the Disciplinary Chamber and the problem with the neo-NCJ, as many as 94 legal judges of the Supreme Court, including retired judges, issued a statement, which was submitted to the Marshal of the Sejm and the Marshal of the Senate. The judges of the Supreme Court also declared their willingness to participate in the work on the bills in the Sejm commission. However, they did not receive a response from either the Sejm or the Senate.

 

The statement was also signed by the former presidents of the Supreme Court, Adam StrzemboszLech Gardocki and Małgorzata Gersdorf.

 

We have published the full content of the statement of the Supreme Court judges:

“Further to the draft amendments to the Act on the Supreme Court and Certain Other Acts of 8 December 2017 (Sejm Form No. 2011), the draft Act on the protection of judicial independence and special rules of criminal and disciplinary liability of judges (Sejm Form No. 2013) and the draft new Act on the Supreme Court (Sejm Paper No. 2050), which were submitted to the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, given the total omission of the judicial community from the process of their preparation and consultation, we declare the following:

  1. We note the attempts to solve the problem of the destruction of the judiciary that has been growing since 2016, including the Supreme Court, simultaneously noticing that the presented drafts do not implement the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 19 November 2019 in joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18, of 2 March 2021 in Case C824/18, of 15 July 2021 in Case C-791/19 and of 6 October 2021 in Case C-487/19. They also fail to take account of the conclusions drawn from the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Reczkowicz v Poland, Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v Poland and Advance Pharma v Poland.
  2. The presented drafts do not contain any proposals of statutory changes regarding the restoration of the National Council of the Judiciary to its constitutional functions, including the duty to safeguard the independence of the courts and the independence of judges. Therefore, we uphold our declaration that we can participate in the work intended to achieve the necessary consensus on these matters in the interest of the public, the judiciary and the citizens.It arises from these judgments of the European Courts that the main source of threats to the state of the rule of law in Poland is the formation of the judicial component of the National Council of the Judiciary on the basis of the provisions of the Act amending the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and certain other acts of 8 December 2017, which is inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, and the related status of people appointed to the office of judge on the basis of resolutions of the National Council of the Judiciary thus formed.
  3. We would like to emphasise that, especially in the current international situation caused by Russia’s aggression with respect to Ukraine, which constitutes a gross breach of the international legal order and human rights violations, legal solutions must be adopted which fully respect the principles of the rule of law and respect the values on which the functioning of the European Union is based. It should be obvious to each of us how important the respect of these values is to the unity of and cooperation between the Member States of the European Union, which constitutes a real guarantee of the protection of the interests of our country.

 

The statement was signed by:

 

Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court

Active judges

Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz

Dariusz Dończyk

Paweł Grzegorczyk

Monika Koba

Grzegorz Misiurek

Władysław Pawlak

Agnieszka Piotrowska

Marta Romańska

Krzysztof Strzelczyk

Roman Trzaskowski

Katarzyna Tyczka-Rote

Karol Weitz

Dariusz Zawistowski

Retired judges

Mirosław Bączyk

Tadeusz Ereciński

Józef Frąckowiak

Jan Górowski

Irena Gromska-Szuster

Jacek Gudowski

Wojciech Katner

Marian Kocon

Iwona Koper

Anna Kozłowska

Zbigniew Kwaśniewski

Barbara Myszka

Anna Owczarek

Henryk Pietrzkowski

Krzysztof Pietrzykowski

Marek Sychowicz

Maria Szulc

Bogumiła Ustjanicz

Lech Walentynowicz

Tadeusz Wiśniewski

Hubert Wrzeszcz

Kazimierz Zawada

Czesława Żuławska

 

Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court

Active judges

Michał Laskowski

Tomasz Artymiuk

Jacek Błaszczyk

Małgorzata Gierszon

Jerzy Grubba

Kazimierz Klugiewicz

Rafał Malarski

Jarosław Matras

Piotr Mirek

Marek Pietruszyński

Waldemar Płóciennik

Zbigniew Puszkarski

Andrzej Siuchniński

Barbara Skoczkowska

Andrzej Stępka

Dariusz Świecki

Andrzej Tomczyk

Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek

Eugeniusz Wildowicz

Paweł Wiliński

Włodzimierz Wróbel

Retired judges

Adam Strzembosz

Lech Gardocki

Stanisław Zabłocki

Wiesław Błuś

Krzysztof Cesarz

Henryk Gradzik

Przemysław Kalinowski

Andrzej Konopka

Józef Musioł

Dorota Rysińska

Roman Sądej

Jacek Sobczak

Ewa Strużyna

Józef Szewczyk

Feliks Tarnowski

Jadwiga Żywolewska-Ławniczak

 

Labour and Social Insurance Chamber of the Supreme Court

Active judges

Piotr Prusinowski

Bohdan Bieniek

Jolanta Frańczak

Katarzyna Gonera

Józef Iwulski

Halina Kiryło

Dawid Miąsik

Maciej Pacuda

Krzysztof Rączka

Romualda Spyt

Retired judges

Małgorzata Gersdorf

Jan Wasilewski

Teresa Flemming-Kulesza

Beata Gudowska

Zbigniew Hajn

Roman Kuczyński

Jerzy Kuźniar

Andrzej Wasilewski

Barbara Wagner

Małgorzata Wrębiakowska-Marzec

Andrzej Wróbel



Author


Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland


More

Published

March 25, 2022

Tags

Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaldisciplinary proceedingsjudgesZbigniew ZiobroPolandCourt of Justice of the EUrule of lawEuropean CommissionNational Council of the Judiciaryjudicial independenceMałgorzata ManowskaEuropean UnionAndrzej DudaCourt of JusticeIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemEuropean Court of Human RightsMateusz MorawieckiMinister of Justicemuzzle lawCommissioner for Human RightsCJEUJarosław KaczyńskiNational Recovery PlanWaldemar ŻurekPrzemysław RadzikKamil Zaradkiewiczdisciplinary commissionerPiotr Schabdemocracyneo-judgespresidential electionselectionsharassmentjudiciaryFirst President of the Supreme CourtAdam Bodnarpreliminary rulingsSupreme Administrative CourtK 3/21Hungarycriminal lawelections 2020National Council for JudiciaryMichał LasotaBeata MorawiecJulia PrzyłębskaprosecutorsŁukasz PiebiakDagmara Pawełczyk-WoickaEuropean Arrest WarrantMaciej NawackiPaweł JuszczyszynPrime MinisterPresidentmedia freedomProsecutor GeneralConstitutionCriminal ChamberRegional Court in KrakówCourt of Justice of the European UnionCOVID-19disciplinary liability for judgesWojciech HermelińskiMałgorzata GersdorfSejmMaciej FerekExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberEU budgetfreedom of expressionStanisław PiotrowiczMarek SafjanAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPresident of the Republic of PolandimmunityAnna Dalkowskaelections 2023National Public ProsecutorCouncil of Europecriminal proceedingsLabour and Social Security Chamberfreedom of assemblyStanisław Biernatconditionality mechanismconditionalityWłodzimierz WróbelLaw and JusticeprosecutionRecovery FundNCJMinistry of JusticeNational ProsecutorNational Electoral CommissionJarosław WyrembakAndrzej Zollacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisK 7/21May 10 2020 electionsLex DudaNational Reconstruction PlanProfessional Liability ChamberPresident of PolandsuspensionLGBTXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandBroda and Bojara v PolandReczkowicz and Others v. Polandparliamentmedia independenceIustitiaJarosław DudziczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczArticle 6 ECHRTHEMISEAWUrsula von der LeyenChamber of Professional LiabilityTVPmediaPiotr Prusinowski2017policeJustice Defence Committee – KOSFreedom HouseLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaSupreme Court PresidentArticle 7Venice CommissionPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaPiotr GąciarekcorruptionP 7/20Justice FundPiSC-791/19Astradsson v IcelandK 6/21Piotr PszczółkowskiCivil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaPegasusMariusz KamińskisurveillanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court Judgeslex NGOcivil societyRussiaJoanna Hetnarowicz-SikoraJarosław GowinLGBT ideology free zonesEdyta Barańskacriminal codeUkraineKrystian MarkiewiczKonrad WytrykowskiJakub IwaniecSenateZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczMarcin WarchołDariusz DrajewiczRafał Puchalskidefamationcourtssmear campaignMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsmilestonesConstitutional Tribunal PresidentMarzanna Piekarska-DrążekEwa WrzosekEU law primacyLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsWojciech MaczugaBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independenceMaciej Miterademocratic backslidingViktor OrbanOLAFdecommunizationNext Generation EUvetoabortionJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJrecommendationcommission on Russian influenceTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiHuman Rights CommissionerMarek MazurkiewiczCCBEAndrzej MączyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskireportBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersEuropean ParliamentOKO.pressZiobroDariusz ZawistowskiMichał Laskowskiintimidation of dissentersMarek PietruszyńskitransferKrystyna PawłowiczMariusz MuszyńskiPiebiak gatehuman rightsEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiMarian BanaśSupreme Audit OfficeAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyKrakówcoronavirusXero Flor v. PolandEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej Rutkiewiczresolution of 23 January 2020Mirosław WróblewskiLeon Kieresright to protestSławomir JęksaPKWWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman Giertychinfringment actionEU valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinanceENCJJacek SasinErnest BejdaThe First President of the Supreme CourtMaciej CzajkaMariusz JałoszewskiIsraelŁukasz Radkeforeign agents lawpolexitDolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtPaulina Kieszkowska-KnapikMaria Ejchart-DuboisAgreement for the Rule of LawPorozumienie dla PraworządnościLGBT free zonesAct sanitising the judiciaryequalityMarek AstChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimesCourt of Appeal in Krakówhate speechPutinismKaczyńskiGrzęda v Polandright to fair trialPaulina AslanowiczJarosław MatrasŻurek v PolandMałgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekSobczyńska and Others v Polandct on the Protection of the PopulatiolegislationRafał Trzaskowskilex Wośmedia lawRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtPrzemysła RadzikAntykastaStanisław ZdunIrena BochniakKrystyna Morawa-FryźlewiczKatarzyna ChmuraElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiGrzegorz FurmankiewiczJacek CzaputowiczMarek JaskulskiPrzemysław CzarnekJoanna Kołodziej-Michałowiczlegislative practiceEwa ŁąpińskaZbigniew ŁupinaENAPaweł StyrnaZbigniew BoniekKasta/AntykastaAndrzej SkowronŁukasz BilińskiIvan MischenkoOmbudsmanMonika FrąckowiakArkadiusz CichockiKraśnikEmilia SzmydtNorwayTomasz SzmydtNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsE-mail scandalDworczyk leaksMichał DworczykC-487/19media pluralism#RecoveryFilesArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in Amsterdamrepairing the rule of lawOpenbaar MinisterieAK judgmentBohdan BieniekSimpson judgmentMarcin KrajewskiForum Współpracy SędziówMałgorzata Dobiecka-Woźniakelectoral processChamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairspublic broadcasterWiesław KozielewiczNational Recovery Plan Monitoring CommitteeGrzegorz PudaPiotr MazurekJerzy Kwaśniewskimutual trustPetros Tovmasyancourt presidentsLMODIHRIrelandFull-Scale Election Observation MissionNGOIrena MajcherAmsterdamKarolina MiklaszewskaRafał LisakMałgorzata FroncJędrzej Dessoulavy-ŚliwińskiSebastian Mazurekthe Regional Court in WarsawElżbieta Jabłońska-MalikSzymon Szynkowski vel SękUnited NationsJoanna Scheuring-Wielgusinsulting religious feelingsLeszek Mazuroppositionelectoral codeAdam Gendźwiłłpopulisminterim measuresDariusz Dończykautocratizationtest of independenceMultiannual Financial FrameworkTomasz Koszewskipublic mediaJakub Kwiecińskiabortion rulingdiscriminationequal treatmentAct on the Supreme Courtprotestselectoral commissionsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsEuropean Court of HuDenmarkKrzysztof RączkaSwedenPoznańFinlandKoan LenaertsMariusz KrasońKarol WeitzCT PresidentKaspryszyn v PolandGermanyNCR&DCelmerNCBiRC354/20 PPUThe National Centre for Research and DevelopmentC412/20 PPUEuropean Anti-Fraud Office OLAFAusl 301 AR 104/19Justyna WydrzyńskaKarlsruheAgnieszka Brygidyr-Doroszact on misdemeanoursJoanna KnobelCivil Service ActCrimes of espionageParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUextraordinary commissionZbigniew KapińskiWhite PaperAnna GłowackalustrationCourt of Appeal in Warsawtransitional justiceOsiatyński'a Archive2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generaltransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s OfficeWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatePechOlsztyn courtKochenovPrzemysła CzarnekEvgeni TanchevEducation MinisterFreedom in the WorldECJIpsosFrackowiakOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeretirement ageAmnesty InternationalHudocKonrad SzymańskiPiotr Bogdanowicztrans-Atlantic valuesPiotr BurasLSOauthoritarian equilibriumlawyersArticle 258Act of 20 December 2019clientelismoligarchic systemEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officerepressive actPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisKoen LenaertsMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykharrassmentAlina CzubieniakTVNjournalistslexTVNGerard BirgfellerEwa MaciejewskaPolish mediapostal voteRzeszówborderpostal vote billprimacy