Judges demonstrating across Poland: “We won’t be intimidated”

Share

Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

More

Polish judges are again showing the government and the small number of collaborator judges that they will not be broken or be intimidated by disciplinary proceedings.



Demonstration of solidarity

 

In April 2019, judges demonstrated in 24 courts across Poland, taking group photos under the slogan “We won’t be intimidated” and participating in a demonstration of solidarity with judges who are being attacked by the disciplinary spokesperson. Piotr Schab is an appointee of the Minister of Justice, Zbigniew Ziobro. Along with deputies Michał Lasota and Przemysław Radzik, he is pursuing dozens of justices for their criticism of the “good change” in the courts, independent verdicts, gatherings with ordinary citizens, and for wearing shirts bearing the word “Constitution.”

 

As part of this campaign, judges are demonstrating their solidarity with judge Alina Czubieniak of Gorzów Wielkopolski, who was the first to be punished by the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court for a ruling she issued. PiS established this chamber as a means of quickly removing defiant judges, prosecutors, and lawyers from the legal profession.

 

Judge Czubieniak was punished for a ruling in which she sought to protect a disabled 19-year-old unable to read or write. The verdict was not, however, to the liking of Minister Ziobro, and the disciplinary case led to the judge being found responsible. The Chamber punished her with a rebuke.

 

This verdict outraged judges and the legal community around Poland, because the judge was punished for the content of a verdict, which constitutes a dangerous precedent.

 

Czubieniak spontaneously and harshly criticized both the conduct of the proceedings and the verdict of the Disciplinary Chamber in her case. This, in turn, led to the disciplinary spokesperson bringing another case against her.

 

This is why judges are demonstrating solidarity with justice Czubieniak. Because the same thing is already happening to other judges and may soon happen to more of them. The disciplinary spokesperson and his deputies have already shown their willingness to persecute judges on the slightest pretense.

 

The idea for a solidarity demonstration came from judges in Lublin, members of the Iustitia Polish Judges Association. At the beginning of April, they held a picket in front of the court, during which they showed their support for judge Czubieniak and other persecuted judges.

 

The idea caught on in other courts. Gestures of solidarity came from judges in Rzeszów, Łódź, Kraków, and even a small district court in Bartoszyce.

 

On 5 April the demonstrations were joined by judges from Bydgoszcz, Kętrzyn, and Olsztyn. Maciej Nawacki, president of the regional court in Olsztyn (appointed to the post by Justice Minister Ziobro) and member of the new National Council of the Judiciary, summoned the police on judges protesting in front of the court there. The Olsztyn judges refused to be terrorized.

 

More courts then joined in the demonstration: Gorzów Wielkopolski, Gdańsk, Gdynia, Poznań, Wejherowo, Kielce, Słupsk, Szczecin, Elbląg, Toruń, and Włocławek.

 

Judges from Gorzów Wielkopolski
Judges in Gorzów Wielkopolski

 

Judges in Sopot
Judges in Sopot

 

Judges in Gdańsk
Judges in Gdańsk

 

Poznań
Judges in Poznań

 

Wejherowo
Judges in Wejherowo

 

Kielce
Judges in Kielce

 

Słupsk
Judges in Słupsk

 

Szczecin
Judges in Szczecin

 

Szczecin Appeals
Judges from the Szczecin Court of Appeals
Elbląg
Judges in Elbląg

 

Toruń
Judges in Toruń

 

Włocławek
Judges in Włocławek

 

Gdynia
Judges in Gdynia

 

Zielona Góra
Judges in Zielona Góra

 

In total, 24 courts have already demonstrated their solidarity with the persecuted judges. Numbers of participants range from a few (in small district courts) to several dozen, and some group photos of solidarity feature over 100 judges.

 

Justices posing for photos are holding letters that compose slogans, as well as banners that read:

 

  • “We won’t be intimidated”
  • “Constitution”
  • “Solidarity with judge Czubieniak”
  • “Independent courts the right of every citizen”
  • “Courts under control = people under control”

 

On Wednesday, 10 April, judges from the largest court in Poland, the Circuit Court in Warsaw, joined in the protests. They took a photo in solidarity, displaying two slogans: “We won’t be intimidated” and “Solidarity with judge Alina Czubieniak”.

 

On Friday, 12 April, judges from Zielona Góra demonstrated solidarity with judge Czubieniak, and on Monday, 15 April they were joined by justices from Katowice. The photo below taken in front of the Court of Appeals includes Krystian Markiewicz, the head of Iustitia, the largest association of judges in Poland.

 

[translated by Matthew La Fontaine]



Author


Journalist covering law and politics for OKO.press. Previously journalist at Gazeta Wyborcza, Rzeczpospolita, Polska The Times, Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.


More

Published

April 19, 2019

Tags

Supreme CourtDisciplinary ChamberConstitutional Tribunaldisciplinary proceedingsPolandrule of lawZbigniew Ziobrojudicial independenceCourt of Justice of the EUEuropean CommissionNational Council of the JudiciaryjudgesEuropean UnionCourt of JusticeMałgorzata ManowskaAndrzej DudaIgor Tuleyadisciplinary systemCommissioner for Human RightsEuropean Court of Human RightsCJEUMinister of JusticeMateusz MorawieckiJarosław Kaczyńskipresidential electionsjudiciaryAdam Bodnarpreliminary rulingsdemocracyK 3/21muzzle lawHungaryelections 2020Kamil ZaradkiewiczBeata MorawiecFirst President of the Supreme CourtprosecutorsWaldemar Żurekdisciplinary commissionerEuropean Arrest WarrantProsecutor GeneralConstitutionCOVID-19Julia PrzyłębskaPresidentmedia freedomfreedom of expressionCourt of Justice of the European Unioncriminal lawMarek SafjanAleksander StepkowskiOSCEPaweł JuszczyszynNational Public ProsecutorPiotr SchabPrzemysław Radzikcriminal proceedingsPrime Ministerfreedom of assemblyStanisław BiernatExtraordinary Control and Public Affairs ChamberSupreme Administrative Courtconditionality mechanismconditionalityEU budgetCriminal ChamberLaw and JusticeprosecutionNCJMinistry of JusticeNational ProsecutorelectionsWojciech HermelińskiStanisław PiotrowiczAndrzej ZollMałgorzata Gersdorfacting first president of the Supreme CourtOrdo IurisMay 10 2020 electionsBroda and Bojara v Polandmedia independenceAmsterdam District CourtKrzysztof ParchimowiczTHEMISMaciej NawackiEAWmediaimmunityAnna DalkowskaCouncil of Europe2017policeFreedom HouseLech GarlickiEwa ŁętowskaArticle 7Venice CommissionWłodzimierz WróbelPM Mateusz MorawieckiAndrzej StępkaP 7/20Justice FundPiSC-791/19disciplinary liability for judgesNational Electoral CommissionAstradsson v IcelandPiotr PszczółkowskiJarosław WyrembakPegasusGeneral Assembly of the Supreme Court JudgesPresident of PolandPresident of the Republic of PolandJarosław GowinLGBTLGBT ideology free zonesSejmXero Flor w Polsce Sp. z o.o. v. PolandReczkowicz and Others v. PolandIustitiaKrystian MarkiewiczMichał LasotaZuzanna Rudzińska-BluszczSylwia Gregorczyk-AbramdefamationcourtsEwa WrzosekEU law primacyTVPLex Super OmniaAdam TomczyńskiBelgiumNetherlandsBogdan Święczkowskijudcial independencedemocratic backslidingViktor OrbanOLAFdecommunizationNext Generation EUvetoJózef IwulskiLaw on the NCJJustice Defence Committee – KOSrecommendationTeresa Dębowska-RomanowskaKazimierz DziałochaMirosław GranatAdam JamrózStefan JaworskiBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-PetrykowskaWojciech ŁączkowskiHuman Rights CommissionerMarek MazurkiewiczCCBEAndrzej MączyńskiThe Council of Bars and Law Societies of EuropeJanusz NiemcewiczMałgorzata Pyziak- SzafnickaStanisław Rymarpublic opinion pollFerdynand RymarzAndrzej RzeplińskiSupreme Court PresidentJerzy StępieńPiotr TulejaSławomira Wronkowska-JaśkiewiczMirosław WyrzykowskireportBohdan ZdziennickiMarek ZubikDidier ReyndersEuropean ParliamentOKO.pressZiobroMichał LaskowskiMarek PietruszyńskiPiotr Gąciarekhuman rightscorruptionEuropean Association of Judges11 January March in WarsawPaweł FilipekMaciej TaborowskiAdam SynakiewiczBelarusstate of emergencyneo-judgescoronavirusXero Flor v. PolandEU treatiesAgnieszka Niklas-BibikSłupsk Regional CourtMaciej Rutkiewiczresolution of 23 January 2020K 6/21Mirosław WróblewskiCivil ChamberJoanna Misztal-KoneckaLeon Kieresright to protestSławomir JęksaPKWWiktor JoachimkowskiRoman GiertychMariusz Kamińskiinfringment actionsurveillanceEU valuesMichał WośMinistry of FinanceCentral Anti-Corruption BureauENCJJacek SasinErnest Bejdalex NGOThe First President of the Supreme Courtcivil societyMaciej CzajkaRussiaMariusz JałoszewskiIsraelŁukasz Radkeforeign agents lawpolexitNational Recovery PlanK 7/21Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v PolandOrganization of Security and Co-operation in EuropeFirst President of the Suprme CourtLGBT free zonesequalityChamber of Extraordinary Verificationhate crimeshate speechcriminal codeGrzęda v PolandŻurek v PolandSobczyńska and Others v PolandRafał Trzaskowskimedia lawPrzemysła RadzikSenateMarcin WarchołElżbieta KarskaMarcin RomanowskiJacek CzaputowiczPrzemysław Czarneklegislative practiceENAZbigniew BoniekOmbudsmanKraśnikNorwayNorwegian fundsNorwegian Ministry of Foreign AffairsMichał WawrykiewiczFree CourtsC-487/19Article 6 ECHRArticle 10 ECHRRegional Court in AmsterdamOpenbaar MinisterieUrsula von der LeyenAK judgmentSimpson judgmentForum Współpracy Sędziówpublic broadcastermutual trustLMIrelandIrena MajcherAmsterdamthe Regional Court in WarsawUnited NationsLeszek MazurMaciej Miterapopulisminterim measuresautocratizationMultiannual Financial Frameworkabortion rulingequal treatmentabortionprotestsfundamental rightsthe NetherlandsDenmarkSwedenFinlandMariusz KrasońCT PresidentGermanyCelmerC354/20 PPUC412/20 PPUAusl 301 AR 104/19Karlsruheact on misdemeanoursCivil Service ActParliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeEUWhite Paperlustrationtransitional justice2018Nations in TransitCouncil of the EUmedia taxStanisław Zabłockiadvertising taxmediabezwyboruJacek KurskiKESMAIndex.huTelex.huJelenJózsef SzájerKlubrádióSLAPPLIBE CommitteeStrategic Lawsuits Against Public ParticipationFrans TimmermansGazeta WyborczaUS Department of StatePollitykaBrussels IRome IISwieczkowskiArticle 2Forum shoppingadvocate generalDariusz ZawistowskitransparencyEuropean Economic and Social Committeepress releaseSebastian KaletaRights and Values ProgrammeC-156/21C-157/21C-619/18Marek Piertuszyńskidefamatory statementsWorld Justice Project awardNational Prosecutor’s Officeintimidation of dissentersWojciech SadurskiBogdan ŚwiączkowskiDisicplinary ChamberjudgeTribunal of StatetransferPechOlsztyn courtKochenovPrzemysła CzarnekEvgeni TanchevEducation MinisterFreedom in the WorldKrystyna PawłowiczECJIpsosFrackowiakOlimpia Barańska-Małuszeretirement ageMariusz MuszyńskiAmnesty InternationalHudocŁukasz PiebiakRegional Court in KrakówPiebiak gateKonrad SzymańskiPiotr Bogdanowicztrans-Atlantic valuesPiotr BurasLSOauthoritarian equilibriumlawyersArticle 258Act of 20 December 2019clientelismoligarchic systemRecovery FundEuropean Public Prosecutor's Officerepressive actPolish National FoundationLux VeritatisKoen LenaertsMałgorzata BednarekPiotr WawrzykharrassmentMarian BanaśAlina CzubieniakSupreme Audit OfficeTVNjournalistslexTVNGerard BirgfellerEwa MaciejewskaPolish mediapostal voteKrakówRzeszówDagmara Pawełczyk-Woickaborderpostal vote billprimacy